Protein language model embeddings for fast, accurate, alignment-free protein structure prediction
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] V. Marx. Method of the Year: protein structure prediction , 2022, Nature Methods.
[2] A. Lavie,et al. pH-Dependent Mechanisms of Influenza Infection Mediated by Hemagglutinin , 2021, Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences.
[3] S. Ovchinnikov,et al. ColabFold: making protein folding accessible to all , 2021, bioRxiv.
[4] K. Kavukcuoglu,et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction for the human proteome , 2021, Nature.
[5] Gyu Rie Lee,et al. Accurate prediction of protein structures and interactions using a 3-track neural network , 2021, Science.
[6] Oriol Vinyals,et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold , 2021, Nature.
[7] B. Rost,et al. ProtTrans: Towards Cracking the Language of Lifes Code Through Self-Supervised Deep Learning and High Performance Computing. , 2021, IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence.
[8] B. Berger,et al. Learning the protein language: Evolution, structure, and function. , 2021, Cell systems.
[9] Kevin K. Yang,et al. Learned Embeddings from Deep Learning to Visualize and Predict Protein Sets , 2021, Current protocols.
[10] B. Rost,et al. Light attention predicts protein location from the language of life , 2021, bioRxiv.
[11] Kadina E. Johnston,et al. Protein sequence design with deep generative models , 2021, Current opinion in chemical biology.
[12] Sai Raghavendra Maddhuri Venkata Subramaniya,et al. Analyzing effect of quadruple multiple sequence alignments on deep learning based protein inter-residue distance prediction , 2021, Scientific Reports.
[13] Michal Linial,et al. The language of proteins: NLP, machine learning & protein sequences , 2021, Computational and structural biotechnology journal.
[14] J. Hurley,et al. Crystallographic molecular replacement using an in silico‐generated search model of SARS‐CoV‐2 ORF8 , 2021, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[15] B. Rost,et al. Clustering FunFams using sequence embeddings improves EC purity , 2021, bioRxiv.
[16] J. Hurley,et al. Crystallographic molecular replacement using an in silico-generated search model of SARS-CoV-2 ORF8 , 2021, bioRxiv.
[17] Myle Ott,et al. Biological structure and function emerge from scaling unsupervised learning to 250 million protein sequences , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[18] Yun S. Song,et al. Single Layers of Attention Suffice to Predict Protein Contacts , 2020, bioRxiv.
[19] Tom Sercu,et al. Transformer protein language models are unsupervised structure learners , 2020, bioRxiv.
[20] Tie-Yan Liu,et al. CopulaNet: Learning residue co-evolution directly from multiple sequence alignment for protein structure prediction , 2020, Nature Communications.
[21] Xiaogen Zhou,et al. Deducing high-accuracy protein contact-maps from a triplet of coevolutionary matrices through deep residual convolutional networks , 2020, bioRxiv.
[22] Burkhard Rost,et al. Embeddings from deep learning transfer GO annotations beyond homology , 2020, Scientific Reports.
[23] S. Narayana,et al. Novel structure of the N-terminal helical domain of BibA, a group B streptococcus immunogenic bacterial adhesin. , 2020, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology.
[24] Modeling Aspects , 2020, Finite Elements for Engineers with ANSYS Applications.
[25] Jaime Fern'andez del R'io,et al. Array programming with NumPy , 2020, Nature.
[26] Nikhil Naik,et al. ProGen: Language Modeling for Protein Generation , 2020, bioRxiv.
[27] Demis Hassabis,et al. Improved protein structure prediction using potentials from deep learning , 2020, Nature.
[28] Jianyi Yang,et al. Improved protein structure prediction using predicted interresidue orientations , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[29] Yang Zhang,et al. DeepMSA: constructing deep multiple sequence alignment to improve contact prediction and fold-recognition for distant-homology proteins , 2019, Bioinform..
[30] Colin Raffel,et al. Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer , 2019, J. Mach. Learn. Res..
[31] Kevin Gimpel,et al. ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language Representations , 2019, ICLR.
[32] Burkhard Rost,et al. Modeling aspects of the language of life through transfer-learning protein sequences , 2019, BMC Bioinformatics.
[33] Torsten Schwede,et al. Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)—Round XIII , 2019, Proteins.
[34] Björn Wallner,et al. rawMSA: End-to-end Deep Learning using raw Multiple Sequence Alignments , 2019, PloS one.
[35] John Canny,et al. Evaluating Protein Transfer Learning with TAPE , 2019, bioRxiv.
[36] Aaron Bauer,et al. De novo protein design by citizen scientists , 2019, Nature.
[37] George M. Church,et al. Unified rational protein engineering with sequence-only deep representation learning , 2019, bioRxiv.
[38] Milot Mirdita,et al. HH-suite3 for fast remote homology detection and deep protein annotation , 2019, BMC Bioinformatics.
[39] Bonnie Berger,et al. Learning protein sequence embeddings using information from structure , 2019, ICLR.
[40] Mohammed AlQuraishi,et al. ProteinNet: a standardized data set for machine learning of protein structure , 2019, BMC Bioinformatics.
[41] Ming-Wei Chang,et al. BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding , 2019, NAACL.
[42] B. Berks,et al. Type 9 secretion system structures reveal a new protein transport mechanism , 2018, Nature.
[43] David T. Jones,et al. High precision in protein contact prediction using fully convolutional neural networks and minimal sequence features , 2018, Bioinform..
[44] Debora S Marks,et al. Deep generative models of genetic variation capture the effects of mutations , 2018, Nature Methods.
[45] Robert P. Sheridan,et al. The EVcouplings Python framework for coevolutionary sequence analysis , 2018, bioRxiv.
[46] A. Tramontano,et al. Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)—Round XII , 2018, Proteins.
[47] Luke S. Zettlemoyer,et al. Deep Contextualized Word Representations , 2018, NAACL.
[48] Atina G. Coté,et al. A framework for exhaustively mapping functional missense variants , 2017, Molecular systems biology.
[49] Johannes Söding,et al. MMseqs2: sensitive protein sequence searching for the analysis of massive data sets , 2017, bioRxiv.
[50] David Baker,et al. Origins of coevolution between residues distant in protein 3D structures , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[51] A. Chakraborty,et al. Deconstruction of the Ras switching cycle through saturation mutagenesis , 2017, eLife.
[52] Lukasz Kaiser,et al. Attention is All you Need , 2017, NIPS.
[53] Martin Weigt,et al. Large-scale identification of coevolution signals across homo-oligomeric protein interfaces by direct coupling analysis , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[54] Maria Jesus Martin,et al. Uniclust databases of clustered and deeply annotated protein sequences and alignments , 2016, Nucleic Acids Res..
[55] Haruki Nakamura,et al. Protein Data Bank (PDB): The Single Global Macromolecular Structure Archive. , 2017, Methods in molecular biology.
[56] Kiyoung Lee,et al. Structure and dynamics study of translation initiation factor 1 from Staphylococcus aureus suggests its RNA binding mode. , 2017, Biochimica et biophysica acta. Proteins and proteomics.
[57] Eric D. Kelsic,et al. RNA Structural Determinants of Optimal Codons Revealed by MAGE-Seq. , 2016, Cell systems.
[58] Zhen Li,et al. Accurate De Novo Prediction of Protein Contact Map by Ultra-Deep Learning Model , 2016, bioRxiv.
[59] Vladlen Koltun,et al. Multi-Scale Context Aggregation by Dilated Convolutions , 2015, ICLR.
[60] I. Xenarios,et al. UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot, the Manually Annotated Section of the UniProt KnowledgeBase: How to Use the Entry View. , 2016, Methods in molecular biology.
[61] Ehsaneddin Asgari,et al. Continuous Distributed Representation of Biological Sequences for Deep Proteomics and Genomics , 2015, PloS one.
[62] Kyle A. Barlow,et al. Determination of ubiquitin fitness landscapes under different chemical stresses in a classroom setting , 2015, bioRxiv.
[63] David T. Jones,et al. MetaPSICOV: combining coevolution methods for accurate prediction of contacts and long range hydrogen bonding in proteins , 2014, Bioinform..
[64] Peter B. McGarvey,et al. UniRef clusters: a comprehensive and scalable alternative for improving sequence similarity searches , 2014, Bioinform..
[65] S. Fields,et al. Deep mutational scanning: a new style of protein science , 2014, Nature Methods.
[66] Markus Gruber,et al. CCMpred—fast and precise prediction of protein residue–residue contacts from correlated mutations , 2014, Bioinform..
[67] Avner Schlessinger,et al. Coordinating the impact of structural genomics on the human α-helical transmembrane proteome , 2013, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.
[68] Thomas A. Hopf,et al. Protein structure prediction from sequence variation , 2012, Nature Biotechnology.
[69] Marco Punta,et al. Structural genomics plucks high-hanging membrane proteins. , 2012, Current opinion in structural biology.
[70] Massimiliano Pontil,et al. PSICOV: precise structural contact prediction using sparse inverse covariance estimation on large multiple sequence alignments , 2012, Bioinform..
[71] Thomas A. Hopf,et al. Protein 3D Structure Computed from Evolutionary Sequence Variation , 2011, PloS one.
[72] Sivaraman Balakrishnan,et al. Learning generative models for protein fold families , 2011, Proteins.
[73] Sergey Lyskov,et al. PyRosetta: a script-based interface for implementing molecular modeling algorithms using Rosetta , 2010, Bioinform..
[74] Ian S. Dunn,et al. Exploring the Limits , 2009 .
[75] Andrei N. Lupas,et al. Gene Duplication of the Eight-stranded β-Barrel OmpX Produces a Functional Pore: A Scenario for the Evolution of Transmembrane β-Barrels , 2007 .
[76] C. Lima,et al. Lysine activation and functional analysis of E2-mediated conjugation in the SUMO pathway , 2006, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.
[77] Marco Punta,et al. Protein folding rates estimated from contact predictions. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.
[78] J. Skolnick,et al. TM-align: a protein structure alignment algorithm based on the TM-score , 2005, Nucleic acids research.
[79] G. Wider,et al. NMR structure of the integral membrane protein OmpX. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.
[80] Cathy H. Wu,et al. UniProt: the Universal Protein knowledgebase , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..
[81] G. Schulz. The structure of bacterial outer membrane proteins. , 2002, Biochimica et biophysica acta.
[82] F. Melchior,et al. Structure determination of the small ubiquitin-related modifier SUMO-1. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.
[83] E D Laue,et al. Regional polysterism in the GTP-bound form of the human c-Ha-Ras protein. , 1997, Biochemistry.
[84] B Rost,et al. Progress of 1D protein structure prediction at last , 1995, Proteins.
[85] K Fidelis,et al. A large‐scale experiment to assess protein structure prediction methods , 1995, Proteins.
[86] D. Wetlaufer. Protein structure. , 1986, Science.