Predicting protein function from sequence and structure
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] A. Lesk,et al. The relation between the divergence of sequence and structure in proteins. , 1986, The EMBO journal.
[2] D M Burns,et al. Evolution of the tryptophan synthetase of fungi. Analysis of experimentally fused Escherichia coli tryptophan synthetase alpha and beta chains. , 1990, The Journal of biological chemistry.
[3] C. Sander,et al. Protein structure comparison by alignment of distance matrices. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.
[4] J. Thompson,et al. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. , 1994, Nucleic acids research.
[5] M. Swindells,et al. Protein clefts in molecular recognition and function. , 1996, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[6] Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new , 1997 .
[7] angesichts der Corona-Pandemie,et al. UPDATE , 1973, The Lancet.
[8] P E Bourne,et al. Protein structure alignment by incremental combinatorial extension (CE) of the optimal path. , 1998, Protein engineering.
[9] Yan P. Yuan,et al. Predicting function: from genes to genomes and back. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.
[10] B. Snel,et al. Conservation of gene order: a fingerprint of proteins that physically interact. , 1998, Trends in biochemical sciences.
[11] D. Eisenberg,et al. Detecting protein function and protein-protein interactions from genome sequences. , 1999, Science.
[12] R. Overbeek,et al. The use of gene clusters to infer functional coupling. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[13] S. Brenner. Errors in genome annotation. , 1999, Trends in genetics : TIG.
[14] D. Eisenberg,et al. Assigning protein functions by comparative genome analysis: protein phylogenetic profiles. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[15] Janet M. Thornton,et al. Comparison of functional annotation schemes for genomes , 2000, Functional & Integrative Genomics.
[16] T. N. Bhat,et al. The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..
[17] D. Higgins,et al. T-Coffee: A novel method for fast and accurate multiple sequence alignment. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.
[18] W. Fitch. Homology a personal view on some of the problems. , 2000, Trends in genetics : TIG.
[19] M. Ashburner,et al. Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology , 2000, Nature Genetics.
[20] A Godzik,et al. Surface map comparison: studying function diversity of homologous proteins. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.
[21] A. Valencia,et al. Similarity of phylogenetic trees as indicator of protein-protein interaction. , 2001, Protein engineering.
[22] A. Valencia,et al. Intrinsic errors in genome annotation. , 2001, Trends in genetics : TIG.
[23] Frances M. G. Pearl,et al. Review: what can structural classifications reveal about protein evolution? , 2001, Journal of structural biology.
[24] Annabel E. Todd,et al. Evolution of function in protein superfamilies, from a structural perspective. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.
[25] Evolution of the Tryptophan Synthetase of Fungi , 2001 .
[26] Alex Bateman,et al. The InterPro database, an integrated documentation resource for protein families, domains and functional sites , 2001, Nucleic Acids Res..
[27] C. A. Andersen,et al. Prediction of human protein function from post-translational modifications and localization features. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.
[28] Erik L. L. Sonnhammer,et al. Automated ortholog inference from phylogenetic trees and calculation of orthology reliability , 2002, Bioinform..
[29] E. Marcotte,et al. Predicting functional linkages from gene fusions with confidence. , 2002, Applied bioinformatics.
[30] Sarah A Teichmann,et al. Conservation of gene co-regulation in prokaryotes and eukaryotes. , 2002, Trends in biotechnology.
[31] B. Rost. Enzyme function less conserved than anticipated. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.
[32] W. S. Valdar,et al. Scoring residue conservation , 2002, Proteins.
[33] Marcin P Joachimiak,et al. JEvTrace: refinement and variations of the evolutionary trace in JAVA , 2002, Genome Biology.
[34] Robert B. Russell,et al. Annotation in three dimensions , 2003 .
[35] J. Skolnick,et al. How well is enzyme function conserved as a function of pairwise sequence identity? , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.
[36] J. Whisstock,et al. Prediction of protein function from protein sequence and structure , 2003, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.
[37] Søren Brunak,et al. Protein feature based identification of cell cycle regulated proteins in yeast. , 2003, Journal of Molecular Biology.
[38] A. Valencia,et al. Automatic methods for predicting functionally important residues. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.
[39] L. Kavraki,et al. An accurate, sensitive, and scalable method to identify functional sites in protein structures. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.
[40] Anne-Lise Veuthey,et al. Automated annotation of microbial proteomes in SWISS-PROT , 2003, Comput. Biol. Chem..
[41] Darren A. Natale,et al. The COG database: an updated version includes eukaryotes , 2003, BMC Bioinformatics.
[42] Rainer Breitling,et al. Iterative Group Analysis (iGA): A simple tool to enhance sensitivity and facilitate interpretation of microarray experiments , 2004, BMC Bioinformatics.
[43] Janet M. Thornton,et al. An algorithm for constraint-based structural template matching: application to 3D templates with statistical analysis , 2003, Bioinform..
[44] Sudhir Kumar,et al. Genomic clocks and evolutionary timescales. , 2003, Trends in genetics : TIG.
[45] Carole A. Goble,et al. Investigating Semantic Similarity Measures Across the Gene Ontology: The Relationship Between Sequence and Annotation , 2003, Bioinform..
[46] Robert B. Russell,et al. Annotation in three dimensions. PINTS: Patterns in Non-homologous Tertiary Structures , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..
[47] Ashish V. Tendulkar,et al. Functional sites in protein families uncovered via an objective and automated graph theoretic approach. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.
[48] M. Campbell,et al. PANTHER: a library of protein families and subfamilies indexed by function. , 2003, Genome research.
[49] Frances M. G. Pearl,et al. The CATH domain structure database. , 2005, Methods of biochemical analysis.
[50] Dmitrij Frishman,et al. MIPS: analysis and annotation of proteins from whole genomes in 2005 , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..
[51] H. Wolfson,et al. Recognition of Functional Sites in Protein Structures☆ , 2004, Journal of Molecular Biology.
[52] Natalie Wilson,et al. Human Protein Reference Database , 2004, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.
[53] D. Frishman,et al. A domain interaction map based on phylogenetic profiling. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.
[54] Geoffrey J. Barton,et al. GOtcha: a new method for prediction of protein function assessed by the annotation of seven genomes , 2004, BMC Bioinformatics.
[55] Janet M. Thornton,et al. The Catalytic Site Atlas: a resource of catalytic sites and residues identified in enzymes using structural data , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..
[56] T. Blundell,et al. Distinguishing structural and functional restraints in evolution in order to identify interaction sites. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.
[57] P. Bork,et al. Analysis of genomic context: prediction of functional associations from conserved bidirectionally transcribed gene pairs , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.
[58] Patrik Edén,et al. Comparing Functional Annotation Analyses with Catmap Comparing Functional Annotation Analyses with Catmap , 2004 .
[59] Kengo Kinoshita,et al. eF-site and PDBjViewer: database and viewer for protein functional sites , 2004, Bioinform..
[60] J. Skolnick,et al. EFICAz: a comprehensive approach for accurate genome-scale enzyme function inference. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.
[61] Robert D. Finn,et al. The Pfam protein families database , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..
[62] Pierre Dönnes,et al. Predicting Protein Subcellular Localization: Past, Present, and Future , 2004, Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics.
[63] Robert C. Edgar,et al. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.
[64] J. Thornton,et al. Predicting protein function from sequence and structural data. , 2005, Current opinion in structural biology.
[65] Michael I. Jordan,et al. Protein Molecular Function Prediction by Bayesian Phylogenomics , 2005, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[66] A. E. Hirsh,et al. Functional genomic analysis of the rates of protein evolution. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[67] David A. Lee,et al. Identification and distribution of protein families in 120 completed genomes using Gene3D , 2005, Proteins.
[68] K. Katoh,et al. MAFFT version 5: improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment , 2005, Nucleic acids research.
[69] A decade of genome-wide biology , 2005, Nature Genetics.
[70] Gail J. Bartlett,et al. Effective function annotation through catalytic residue conservation. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[71] Erik L. L. Sonnhammer,et al. FunShift: a database of function shift analysis on protein subfamilies , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..
[72] Adel Golovin,et al. MSDsite: A database search and retrieval system for the analysis and viewing of bound ligands and active sites , 2004, Proteins.
[73] Rachel Kolodny,et al. Comprehensive evaluation of protein structure alignment methods: scoring by geometric measures. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.
[74] Janet M. Thornton,et al. ProFunc: a server for predicting protein function from 3D structure , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..
[75] Ruth Nussinov,et al. SiteEngines: recognition and comparison of binding sites and protein–protein interfaces , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..
[76] D. Eisenberg,et al. Inference of protein function from protein structure. , 2005, Structure.
[77] Erik L. L. Sonnhammer,et al. Inparanoid: a comprehensive database of eukaryotic orthologs , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..
[78] Pablo Tamayo,et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: A knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[79] A. Valencia,et al. Text-mining and information-retrieval services for molecular biology , 2005, Genome Biology.
[80] M. Sternberg,et al. Assessing protein co-evolution in the context of the tree of life assists in the prediction of the interactome. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.
[81] Jie Liang,et al. Protein surface analysis for function annotation in high‐throughput structural genomics pipeline , 2005, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[82] Ying Wei,et al. Prediction of active sites for protein structures from computed chemical properties , 2005, ISMB.
[83] Dennis R. Livesay,et al. MINER: software for phylogenetic motif identification , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..
[84] David L. Wheeler,et al. GenBank , 2015, Nucleic Acids Res..
[85] Janet M Thornton,et al. Protein function prediction using local 3D templates. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.
[86] Daisuke Kihara,et al. Enhanced automated function prediction using distantly related sequences and contextual association by PFP , 2006, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[87] K. S. Deshpande,et al. Human protein reference database—2006 update , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..
[88] E. Birney,et al. Dry work in a wet world: computation in systems biology , 2006, Molecular systems biology.
[89] Cathy H. Wu,et al. The Universal Protein Resource (UniProt): an expanding universe of protein information , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..
[90] Ziv Bar-Joseph,et al. Evaluation of different biological data and computational classification methods for use in protein interaction prediction , 2006, Proteins.
[91] K. Sjölander,et al. PhyloFacts: an online structural phylogenomic encyclopedia for protein functional and structural classification , 2006, Genome Biology.
[92] J. Heringa,et al. Sequence comparison by sequence harmony identifies subtype-specific functional sites , 2006, Nucleic acids research.
[93] A. S. Juncker,et al. A wiring of the human nucleolus. , 2006, Molecular cell.
[94] A. M. Lisewski,et al. Rapid detection of similarity in protein structure and function through contact metric distances , 2006, Nucleic acids research.
[95] Olivier Lichtarge,et al. ET viewer: an application for predicting and visualizing functional sites in protein structures , 2006, Bioinform..
[96] Nikos Kyrpides,et al. The Genomes On Line Database (GOLD) v.2: a monitor of genome projects worldwide , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..
[97] Gopal R. Gopinath,et al. Reactome: a knowledge base of biologic pathways and processes , 2007, Genome Biology.
[98] Hans-Werner Mewes,et al. MPact: the MIPS protein interaction resource on yeast , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..
[99] S. Henikoff,et al. Predicting the effects of amino acid substitutions on protein function. , 2006, Annual review of genomics and human genetics.
[100] Omkar Mate. Protein Structure Alignment Protein Structure Alignment , 2006 .
[101] Gabrielle A. Reeves,et al. Structural diversity of domain superfamilies in the CATH database. , 2006, Journal of molecular biology.
[102] J. Gardy,et al. Methods for predicting bacterial protein subcellular localization , 2006, Nature Reviews Microbiology.
[103] Patricia C. Babbitt,et al. Automated discovery of 3D motifs for protein function annotation , 2006, Bioinform..
[104] Alfonso Valencia,et al. Phylogeny-independent detection of functional residues , 2006, Bioinform..
[105] J. Gardy,et al. Methods for predicting bacterial protein subcellular localization , 2006, Nature Reviews Microbiology.
[106] Alexander E. Kel,et al. TRANSPATH®: an information resource for storing and visualizing signaling pathways and their pathological aberrations , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..
[107] Olivier Lichtarge,et al. Rank information: A structure‐independent measure of evolutionary trace quality that improves identification of protein functional sites , 2006, Proteins.
[108] Dmitrij Frishman,et al. MIPS: analysis and annotation of proteins from whole genomes in 2005 , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..
[109] R. Russell,et al. Structural systems biology: modelling protein interactions , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.
[110] Jukka Corander,et al. Bayesian search of functionally divergent protein subgroups and their function specific residues , 2006, Bioinform..
[111] Thomas Lengauer,et al. A new measure for functional similarity of gene products based on Gene Ontology , 2006, BMC Bioinformatics.
[112] A. Godzik,et al. Computational protein function prediction: Are we making progress? , 2007, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.
[113] Christian von Mering,et al. STRING 7—recent developments in the integration and prediction of protein interactions , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..
[114] Frances M. G. Pearl,et al. The CATH domain structure database: new protocols and classification levels give a more comprehensive resource for exploring evolution , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..
[115] Pingzhao Hu,et al. Computational prediction of cancer-gene function , 2007, Nature Reviews Cancer.
[116] Christine A. Orengo,et al. Inferring Function Using Patterns of Native Disorder in Proteins , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[117] Helen E. Parkinson,et al. ArrayExpress—a public database of microarray experiments and gene expression profiles , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..
[118] Christine A. Orengo,et al. Predicting Protein Function with Hierarchical Phylogenetic Profiles: The Gene3D Phylo-Tuner Method Applied to Eukaryotic Genomes , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[119] Benjamin A. Shoemaker,et al. Deciphering Protein–Protein Interactions. Part II. Computational Methods to Predict Protein and Domain Interaction Partners , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[120] Robert D. Finn,et al. New developments in the InterPro database , 2007, Nucleic Acids Res..
[121] Sandhya Rani,et al. Human Protein Reference Database—2009 update , 2008, Nucleic Acids Res..