Dissociable brain states linked to common and creative object use

Studies of conceptual processing have revealed that the prefrontal cortex is implicated in close‐ended, deliberate memory retrieval, especially the left ventrolateral prefrontal regions. However, much of human thought—particularly that which is characterized as creative—requires more open‐ended, spontaneous memory retrieval. To explore the neural systems that support conceptual processing under these two distinct circumstances, we obtained functional magnetic resonance images from 24 participants either while retrieving the common use of an everyday object (e.g., “blowing your nose,” in response to a picture of a tissue) or while generating a creative (i.e., uncommon but plausible) use for it (e.g., “protective padding in a package”). The patterns of activation during open‐ and closed‐ended tasks were reliably different, with regard to the magnitude of anterior versus posterior activation. Specifically, the close‐ended task (i.e., Common Use task) reliably activated regions of lateral prefrontal cortex, whereas the open‐ended task (i.e., Uncommon Use task) reliably activated regions of occipito‐temporal cortex. Furthermore, there was variability across subjects in the types of responses produced on the open‐ended task that was associated with the magnitude of activation in the middle occipital gyrus on this task. The present experiment is the first to demonstrate a dynamic tradeoff between anterior frontal and posterior occipitotemporal regions brought about by the close‐ or open‐ended task demands. Hum Brain Mapp, 2011. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  Stephen Monsell,et al.  Control of Cognitive Processes , 2000 .

[2]  David Badre,et al.  Left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex and the cognitive control of memory , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  Edward M. Bowden,et al.  The origins of insight in resting-state brain activity , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  M. Farah,et al.  Role of left inferior prefrontal cortex in retrieval of semantic knowledge: a reevaluation. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  Irene P. Kan,et al.  Effect of name agreement on prefrontal activity during overt and covert picture naming , 2004, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[6]  C. Martindale,et al.  EEG differences as a function of creativity, stage of the creative process, and effort to be original , 1978, Biological Psychology.

[7]  J. Zacks Neuroimaging Studies of Mental Rotation: A Meta-analysis and Review , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[8]  J. Risberg,et al.  On the neurobiology of creativity. Differences in frontal activity between high and low creative subjects , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  Irene P. Kan,et al.  Effects of Repetition and Competition on Activity in Left Prefrontal Cortex during Word Generation , 1999, Neuron.

[10]  A. Dietrich,et al.  The cognitive neuroscience of creativity , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[11]  Ian R Summers,et al.  Semantic divergence and creative story generation: an fMRI investigation. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[12]  Simon C Gandevia,et al.  Savant-like skills exposed in normal people by suppressing the left fronto-temporal lobe. , 2003, Journal of integrative neuroscience.

[13]  S. Thompson-Schill,et al.  The frontal lobes and the regulation of mental activity , 2005, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[14]  Edward M. Bowden,et al.  The Prepared Mind , 2006, Psychological science.

[15]  K. Amunts,et al.  Head motion during overt language production in functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2006, Neuroreport.

[16]  Ann M. Graybiel,et al.  A Genetic Basis for Obsessive Grooming , 2002, Neuron.

[17]  S. Petersen,et al.  Development of distinct control networks through segregation and integration , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  Arthur P. Shimamura,et al.  The role of the prefrontal cortex in dynamic filtering , 2000, Psychobiology.

[19]  L. Tyler,et al.  Towards a distributed account of conceptual knowledge , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[20]  Markus Kiefer,et al.  Conceptual Flexibility in the Human Brain: Dynamic Recruitment of Semantic Maps from Visual, Motor, and Motion-related Areas , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[21]  A. Braun,et al.  Neural Substrates of Spontaneous Musical Performance: An fMRI Study of Jazz Improvisation , 2008, PloS one.

[22]  Madalina E. Tivarus,et al.  Beta-adrenergic Modulation of Cognitive Flexibility during Stress , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  H. Simon,et al.  Studies of Scientific Discovery: Complementary Approaches and Convergent Findings , 1999 .

[24]  R. Weisberg Creativity: Understanding Innovation in Problem Solving, Science, Invention, and the Arts , 2006 .

[25]  J. Jonides,et al.  Brain mechanisms of proactive interference in working memory , 2006, Neuroscience.

[26]  Katsuyuki Sakai,et al.  Is the Prefrontal Cortex Necessary for Establishing Cognitive Sets? , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  C. Frith,et al.  The role of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in the selection of action as revealed by functional imaging , 2000 .

[28]  K. Heilman,et al.  Creative Innovation: Possible Brain Mechanisms , 2003, Neurocase.

[29]  Alex Martin,et al.  Functional Neuroimaging of Semantic Memory , 2001 .

[30]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  The Variability of Human, BOLD Hemodynamic Responses , 1998, NeuroImage.

[31]  J. Born,et al.  EEG complexity and performance measures of creative thinking. , 1999, Psychophysiology.

[32]  Allan Snyder,et al.  Explaining and inducing savant skills: privileged access to lower level, less-processed information , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[33]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Frontal and Temporo-Parietal Lobe Contributions to Theory of Mind: Neuropsychological Evidence from a False-Belief Task with Reduced Language and Executive Demands , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[34]  S. Petersen,et al.  A dual-networks architecture of top-down control , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[35]  K. Heilman,et al.  Artwork Before and After Onset of Progressive Nonfluent Aphasia , 2007, Cognitive and behavioral neurology : official journal of the Society for Behavioral and Cognitive Neurology.

[36]  Claudio Babiloni,et al.  Human neural systems for conceptual knowledge of proper object use: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[37]  C. Reverberi,et al.  Better without (lateral) frontal cortex? Insight problems solved by frontal patients. , 2005, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[38]  E. Cabanis,et al.  The Human Brain: Surface, Three-Dimensional Sectional Anatomy and Mri , 1991 .

[39]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Schooling and the Acquisition of Knowledge , 1978 .

[40]  Allan Snyder,et al.  Savant-like Numerosity Skills Revealed in Normal People by Magnetic Pulses , 2006, Perception.

[41]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of fMRI Time-Series Revisited—Again , 1995, NeuroImage.

[42]  J. Gabrieli,et al.  Immature Frontal Lobe Contributions to Cognitive Control in Children Evidence from fMRI , 2002, Neuron.

[43]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  The variability of human BOLD hemodynamic responses , 1998, NeuroImage.

[44]  Michael B. Miller,et al.  The Left Hemisphere's Role in Hypothesis Formation , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[45]  L. Galli-Resta,et al.  The Dynamics of Neuronal Death: A Time-Lapse Study in the Retina , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[46]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: A primer with examples , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[47]  Michal Lavidor,et al.  Semantically convergent and semantically divergent priming in the cerebral hemispheres: lexical decision and semantic judgment. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[48]  B. Miller,et al.  Unravelling Boléro: progressive aphasia, transmodal creativity and the right posterior neocortex. , 2008, Brain : a journal of neurology.