Functional outcome in subretinal electronic implants depends on foveal eccentricity.

PURPOSE An active microelectronic subretinal implant, developed to replace the photoreceptive function in hereditary degenerations of the outer retina, has been applied in a pilot and clinical study in patients with end-stage retinal degeneration. METHODS The study population comprised 20 blind patients, all of whom lost vision as result of a hereditary retinal disease. An active visual implant was placed surgically within the subretinal space of each patient: subfoveal placement in eight patients (group 1) and parafoveal placement in 12 (group 2). Standardized low-vision tests, including light perception, light localization, movement detection, grating acuity, and visual acuity by Landolt C-rings, were used under masked, randomized implant-OFF and implant-ON conditions. For the chip-mediated vision functional results of both subject groups were compared. RESULTS Three of 20 patients were excluded from analysis because of surgical or technical implant issues. Among patients with nonfoveal placement of the implant, 80% could perceive light, 10% recognized location, and 10% correctly distinguished stripe patterns up to a resolution of 0.33 cycles/degree. No nonfoveal placement patient passed the motion or Landolt C-ring tests. When the implant was placed subfoveally, 100% of patients could perceive light and determine light localization, 75% could resolve motion up to 35°/s, 88% correctly distinguished stripe patterns up to a resolution of 3.3 cycles/degree, and 38% passed a Landolt C-ring test with a decimal visual acuity of up to 20/546 (logMAR 1.43). CONCLUSIONS Subfoveal placement of active subretinal visual implants allows superior measurable outcomes compared to para- or nonfoveal placement locations. (ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT01024803, NCT00515814.).

[1]  S. Wu,et al.  Adler's Physiology of the Eye , 2002 .

[2]  Alfred Stett,et al.  Subretinal electronic chips allow blind patients to read letters and combine them to words , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  Michael Bach,et al.  Basic quantitative assessment of visual performance in patients with very low vision. , 2010, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[4]  Tracey D. Berger,et al.  Crowding and eccentricity determine reading rate. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[5]  Donald C Hood,et al.  The transition zone between healthy and diseased retina in patients with retinitis pigmentosa. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[6]  L. Spillmann,et al.  Filling-in of the foveal blue scotoma , 2001, Vision Research.

[7]  Jessy D. Dorn,et al.  Interim results from the international trial of Second Sight's visual prosthesis. , 2012, Ophthalmology.

[8]  G. J. Suaning,et al.  Focal activation of the feline retina via a suprachoroidal electrode array , 2009, Vision Research.

[9]  Essa Yacoub,et al.  High-field fMRI unveils orientation columns in humans , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  M. Bach,et al.  The Freiburg Visual Acuity test--automatic measurement of visual acuity. , 1996, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[11]  Roland Thewes,et al.  Electrical stimulation of retinal neurons in epiretinal and subretinal configuration using a multicapacitor array. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  K. Stingl,et al.  Was können blinde Patienten mit dem subretinalen Alpha-IMS-Implantat im Alltag sehen? , 2012, Der Ophthalmologe.

[14]  E. Strettoi,et al.  Modifications of retinal neurons in a mouse model of retinitis pigmentosa. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  D. Pelli,et al.  The uncrowded window of object recognition , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[16]  D. Levi Crowding—An essential bottleneck for object recognition: A mini-review , 2008, Vision Research.

[17]  U. Klose,et al.  Positioning of electronic subretinal implants in blind retinitis pigmentosa patients through multimodal assessment of retinal structures. , 2012, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[18]  Karl Deisseroth,et al.  Genetic Reactivation of Cone Photoreceptors Restores Visual Responses in Retinitis Pigmentosa , 2010, Science.

[19]  D. Whitteridge,et al.  The representation of the visual field on the cerebral cortex in monkeys , 1961, The Journal of physiology.

[20]  Angelika Braun,et al.  Artificial vision with wirelessly powered subretinal electronic implant alpha-IMS , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  H. Wässle,et al.  Size, scatter and coverage of ganglion cell receptive field centres in the cat retina. , 1979, The Journal of physiology.

[22]  . Bartz-Schmidt,et al.  Subretinal electronic chips can restore useful visual functions in blind retinitis pigmentosa patients , 2010 .

[23]  A. Milam,et al.  Histopathology of the human retina in retinitis pigmentosa. , 1998, Progress in retinal and eye research.

[24]  B. Wilhelm,et al.  Spatial resolution and perception of patterns mediated by a subretinal 16-electrode array in patients blinded by hereditary retinal dystrophies. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[25]  A. Stett,et al.  Electric Field Stimulation of Bipolar Cells in a Degenerated Retina—A Theoretical Study , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[26]  Michael Bach,et al.  Safety and efficacy of subretinal visual implants in humans: methodological aspects , 2013, Clinical & experimental optometry.

[27]  Peter H. Schiller,et al.  Parallel information processing channels created in the retina , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  Peter Charbel Issa,et al.  Reversal of end-stage retinal degeneration and restoration of visual function by photoreceptor transplantation , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  Eduardo Fernandez,et al.  Toward the development of a cortically based visual neuroprosthesis , 2009, Journal of neural engineering.

[30]  Benoît Gérard,et al.  Object localization, discrimination, and grasping with the optic nerve visual prosthesis. , 2006, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[31]  R. Masland,et al.  The organization of the inner nuclear layer of the rabbit retina , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[32]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[33]  T Fujikado,et al.  Laboratory investigation of microelectronics-based stimulators for large-scale suprachoroidal transretinal stimulation (STS) , 2007, Journal of neural engineering.

[34]  A. Guyton,et al.  Textbook of Medical Physiology , 1961 .

[35]  Kathleen A. Marshall,et al.  Age-dependent effects of RPE65 gene therapy for Leber's congenital amaurosis: a phase 1 dose-escalation trial , 2009, The Lancet.

[36]  D Besch,et al.  [What can blind patients see in daily life with the subretinal Alpha IMS implant? Current overview from the clinical trial in Tübingen]. , 2012, Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft.

[37]  Eberhart Zrenner,et al.  Transcorneal electrical stimulation for patients with retinitis pigmentosa: a prospective, randomized, sham-controlled exploratory study. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[38]  Nick Tyler,et al.  Effect of gene therapy on visual function in Leber's congenital amaurosis. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[39]  Krista I Kinard,et al.  Neural reprogramming in retinal degeneration. , 2007, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[40]  W. Mokwa,et al.  Implantation and explantation of an active epiretinal visual prosthesis: 2-year follow-up data from the EPIRET3 prospective clinical trial , 2012, Eye.

[41]  A. Y. Chow,et al.  The artificial silicon retina microchip for the treatment of vision loss from retinitis pigmentosa. , 2004, Archives of ophthalmology.

[42]  J. Rizzo Update on Retinal Prosthetic Research: The Boston Retinal Implant Project , 2011, Journal of neuro-ophthalmology : the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society.

[43]  D Besch,et al.  Extraocular surgery for implantation of an active subretinal visual prosthesis with external connections: feasibility and outcome in seven patients , 2008, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[44]  A. Milam,et al.  Preservation of the inner retina in retinitis pigmentosa. A morphometric analysis. , 1997, Archives of ophthalmology.

[45]  B. Jones,et al.  Neural remodeling in retinal degeneration , 2003, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[46]  T. Kurth,et al.  Outer Segment Formation of Transplanted Photoreceptor Precursor Cells , 2012, PloS one.

[47]  Thomas Laube,et al.  Acute electrical stimulation of the human retina with an epiretinal electrode array , 2012, Acta ophthalmologica.

[48]  E. L. West,et al.  Effective Transplantation of Photoreceptor Precursor Cells Selected via Cell Surface Antigen Expression , 2011, Stem cells.

[49]  G. Brindley Sensations produced by electrical stimulation of the occipital poles of the cerebral hemispheres, and their use in constructing visual prostheses. , 1970, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[50]  B. Roska,et al.  Optogenetic therapy for retinitis pigmentosa , 2011, Gene Therapy.

[51]  J. L. Stone,et al.  Morphometric analysis of macular photoreceptors and ganglion cells in retinas with retinitis pigmentosa. , 1992, Archives of ophthalmology.