Plasticity in the binocular correspondence of striate cortical receptive fields in kittens.

The influence of visual experience on the correspondence in position and orientation of receptive fields in the two eyes of cortical neurones was studied. Kittens were reared viewing the environment through lenses that magnified the image by 9% in one direction (meridional size lenses) with axes of magnification oriented 45 degrees left and right of vertical for the two eyes. The unequal deformations in the two eyes produced gradients of position disparity and systematic variation of orientation disparity which could not be influenced by eye movements. Two types of arrangement of the lenses, producing opposite disparities, were used; each was worn by two kittens. The receptive fields of cortical neurones were studied in the four kittens aged 3‐4 months. In the binocular cells, the positions of the response fields were plotted, and the preferred orientations determined, using automatic stimulus variation, quantitative analysis, and eye‐drift correction. By means of regression analysis, the degree of ‘interocular deformation’ was assessed; a coefficient D was derived from the positions, an angle beta from the orientations. D specified the position incongruity as a fraction of retinal eccentricity, beta the difference between the orientation incongruities of cells with near‐vertical and near‐horizontal receptive fields. Both D and beta were found to be of opposite signs in the two groups of kittens, as predicted by the optical effects of the lenses. The difference in D between the groups was 0.197 (predicted: 0.172); the difference in beta was 17.0 degrees (predicted: 18.9 degrees). Thus, the difference in visual environment had been completely compensated by adjustments in the positions as well as the orientations of the receptive fields. Since D and beta are independent of the alignment of the eyes, the differences between the groups reflected different functional connexions at the cortical level. Possible advantages of plasticity for the development of binocular vision are discussed. It is argued that the plasticity demonstrated here reflects a more general property of cortical receptive fields.

[1]  R. von der Heydt,et al.  The effect of horizontal‐plane environment on the development of binocular receptive fields of cells in cat visual cortex , 1982, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  J. Pettigrew,et al.  Visual cortical effects of rearing cats with monocular or binocular cyclotorsion. , 1980, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  J. Pettigrew,et al.  A neurophysiological determination of the vertical horopter in the cat and owl , 1979, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[4]  C. Bruce,et al.  Binocular differences in cortical receptive fields of kittens after rotationally disparate binocular experience. , 1977, Science.

[5]  C. Blakemore,et al.  Development of cat visual cortex following rotation of one eye , 1975, Nature.

[6]  J. Pettigrew,et al.  The effect of visual experience on the development of stimulus specificity by kitten cortical neurones , 1974, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  C. Blakemore,et al.  Experimental Creation of Unusual Neuronal Properties in Visual Cortex of Kitten , 1973, Nature.

[8]  J. Pettigrew,et al.  Visual Experience without Lines: Effect on Developing Cortical Neurons , 1973, Science.

[9]  C. Blakemore,et al.  A second neural mechanism of binocular depth discrimination , 1972, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  S. Sherman Development of interocular alignment in cats. , 1972, Brain research.

[11]  R. Shlaer,et al.  Shift in Binocular Disparity Causes Compensatory Change in the Cortical Structure of Kittens , 1971, Science.

[12]  D. N. Spinelli,et al.  Visual Experience Modifies Distribution of Horizontally and Vertically Oriented Receptive Fields in Cats , 1970, Science.

[13]  C. Blakemore,et al.  The neural mechanism of binocular depth discrimination , 1967, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  D. Hubel,et al.  Comparison of the effects of unilateral and bilateral eye closure on cortical unit responses in kittens. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  D. Hubel,et al.  Binocular interaction in striate cortex of kittens reared with artificial squint. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  D. Hubel,et al.  SINGLE-CELL RESPONSES IN STRIATE CORTEX OF KITTENS DEPRIVED OF VISION IN ONE EYE. , 1963, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Some quantitative aspects of the cat's eye: axis and plane of reference, visual field co‐ordinates and optics , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[18]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[19]  K. N. Ogle,et al.  Cyclofusional movements. , 1946, Archives of ophthalmology.

[20]  K. N. Ogle Meridional Magnifying Lens Systems in the Measurement and Correction of Aniseikonia , 1944 .

[21]  P. Cz. Handbuch der physiologischen Optik , 1896 .