A simple transfer function for nonlinear dendritic integration

Relatively recent advances in patch clamp recordings and iontophoresis have enabled unprecedented study of neuronal post-synaptic integration (“dendritic integration”). Findings support a separate layer of integration in the dendritic branches before potentials reach the cell's soma. While integration between branches obeys previous linear assumptions, proximal inputs within a branch produce threshold nonlinearity, which some authors have likened to the sigmoid function. Here we show the implausibility of a sigmoidal relation and present a more realistic transfer function in both an elegant artificial form and a biophysically derived form that further considers input locations along the dendritic arbor. As the distance between input locations determines their ability to produce nonlinear interactions, models incorporating dendritic topology are essential to understanding the computational power afforded by these early stages of integration. We use the biophysical transfer function to emulate empirical data using biophysical parameters and describe the conditions under which the artificial and biophysically derived forms are equivalent.

[1]  C. Stevens,et al.  Voltage dependence of NMDA-activated macroscopic conductances predicted by single-channel kinetics , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[2]  A. Polsky,et al.  Properties of basal dendrites of layer 5 pyramidal neurons: a direct patch-clamp recording study , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[3]  Benjamin Torben-Nielsen,et al.  The Green’s function formalism as a bridge between single- and multi-compartmental modeling , 2013, Biological Cybernetics.

[4]  Jackie Schiller,et al.  Spatiotemporally graded NMDA spike/plateau potentials in basal dendrites of neocortical pyramidal neurons. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  Jaap van Pelt,et al.  A simple vector implementation of the Laplace-transformed cable equations in passive dendritic trees , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[6]  N. Spruston,et al.  Dendritic arithmetic , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[7]  Bruno Delord,et al.  A biophysical model of nonlinear dynamics underlying plateau potentials and calcium spikes in purkinje cell dendrites. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  Andreas Schierwagen,et al.  An equivalent cable model for neuronal trees with active membrane , 1998, Biological Cybernetics.

[9]  CE Jahr,et al.  A quantitative description of NMDA receptor-channel kinetic behavior , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[10]  Stephen R. Williams,et al.  Encoding and Decoding of Dendritic Excitation during Active States in Pyramidal Neurons , 2022 .

[11]  Bartlett W. Mel,et al.  Mechanisms underlying subunit independence in pyramidal neuron dendrites , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  W. Rall Time constants and electrotonic length of membrane cylinders and neurons. , 1969, Biophysical journal.

[13]  M. Häusser,et al.  The single dendritic branch as a fundamental functional unit in the nervous system , 2010, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[14]  D. Johnston,et al.  Voltage-dependent properties of dendrites that eliminate location-dependent variability of synaptic input. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  Bartlett W. Mel,et al.  Encoding and Decoding Bursts by NMDA Spikes in Basal Dendrites of Layer 5 Pyramidal Neurons , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  A. Destexhe Kinetic Models of Synaptic Transmission , 1997 .

[17]  Bartlett W. Mel,et al.  Location-Dependent Effects of Inhibition on Local Spiking in Pyramidal Neuron Dendrites , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[18]  Bartlett W. Mel,et al.  An Augmented Two-Layer Model Captures Nonlinear Analog Spatial Integration Effects in Pyramidal Neuron Dendrites , 2014, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[19]  Wen-Liang L Zhou,et al.  The decade of the dendritic NMDA spike , 2010, Journal of neuroscience research.

[20]  M. Häusser,et al.  Synaptic Integration Gradients in Single Cortical Pyramidal Cell Dendrites , 2011, Neuron.

[21]  Bartlett W. Mel,et al.  Pyramidal Neuron as Two-Layer Neural Network , 2003, Neuron.

[22]  Khashayar Pakdaman,et al.  Reduction of stochastic conductance-based neuron models with time-scales separation , 2011, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[23]  Bartlett W. Mel,et al.  Dendrites: bug or feature? , 2003, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[24]  D. Colquhoun,et al.  Glutamate activation of a single NMDA receptorchannel produces a cluster of channel openings , 1991, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[25]  Bartlett W. Mel,et al.  Distinguishing Linear vs. Non-Linear Integration in CA1 Radial Oblique Dendrites: It’s about Time , 2011, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[26]  Patrick A. Shoemaker,et al.  Neural bistability and amplification mediated by NMDA receptors: Analysis of stationary equations , 2011, Neurocomputing.

[27]  D Colquhoun,et al.  Activation of N‐methyl‐D‐aspartate receptors by L‐glutamate in cells dissociated from adult rat hippocampus. , 1992, The Journal of physiology.

[28]  J. Schiller,et al.  NMDA spikes in basal dendrites of cortical pyramidal neurons , 2000, Nature.

[29]  D. Colquhoun,et al.  Single‐channel activations and concentration jumps: comparison of recombinant NR1a/NR2A and NR1a/NR2D NMDA receptors , 1998, The Journal of physiology.

[30]  Ronald A. J. van Elburg,et al.  Impact of Dendritic Size and Dendritic Topology on Burst Firing in Pyramidal Cells , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[31]  Péter Érdi,et al.  Parallel Computational Subunits in Dentate Granule Cells Generate Multiple Place Fields , 2009, BMC Neuroscience.

[32]  Bartlett W. Mel,et al.  Computational subunits in thin dendrites of pyramidal cells , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.