Spoon handling in two- to four year old children

A method for the study of tool use is presented from the perspective of an ecological approach to perception and action. It is argued that the essence of tool use lies in the maintenance of a specific relation between the organism + tool complex and the environment. Control over the tool is subordinate to this aim. It is proposed that perturbations of the tool-environment relation reveal the essential dimensions of organism + tool complex. A simple experiment is reported in which children (n = 43) from 2 to 4 years of age were asked to use (I of 6) spoons to transport rice from 1 bucket to another. Perturbation of the tool-environment relation was introduced by manipulating the geometrical configuration of the spoons. The results indicated that all children indeed controlled the relation between tool and environment. They varied their grip such that the functional act of scooping was preserved. Hence, they perceived the new spoons in terms of its functional properties, its affordances. In addition, it was...

[1]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Domain-Specific Principles Affect Learning and Transfer in Children , 1990, Cogn. Sci..

[2]  K. Connolly,et al.  Motor development in early and later childhood: longitudinal approaches: Individual patterns of tool use by infants , 1993 .

[3]  Edward S. Reed,et al.  Chapter 2 Applying the Theory of Action Systems to the Study of Motor Skills , 1988 .

[4]  A. Smitsman,et al.  Affordances, perceptual complexity, and the development of tool use. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  J. Landsmeer Power Grip and Precision Handling , 1962, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[6]  A. Berthelet,et al.  The Use of tools by human and non-human primates , 1993 .

[7]  P. Greenfield,et al.  Language, tools and brain: The ontogeny and phylogeny of hierarchically organized sequential behavior , 1991, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[8]  J. Bruner Organization of early skilled action. , 1973, Child development.

[9]  B. Steenbergen,et al.  Achieving Coordination in Prehension: Joint Freezing and Postural Contributions. , 1995, Journal of motor behavior.

[10]  Elizabeth Bates,et al.  Perceptual aspects of tool using in infancy , 1980 .

[11]  J. Elliott,et al.  A CLASSIFICATION OF MANIPULATIVE HAND MOVEMENTS , 1984, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[12]  B. Vereijken,et al.  Free(z)ing Degrees of Freedom in Skill Acquisition , 1992 .

[13]  A. Smitsman,et al.  The development of tool use: Changing boundaries between organism and environment. , 1997 .

[14]  Primate hands and the human hand: the tool of tools , 1993 .

[15]  Sue Taylor Parker,et al.  Object manipulation, tool use and sensorimotor intelligence as feeding adaptations in cebus monkeys and great apes , 1977 .

[16]  Jacob Cohen A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[17]  J. Napier The prehensile movements of the human hand. , 1956, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[18]  K. Connolly,et al.  The Emergence of a Tool-Using Skill in Infancy. , 1989 .

[19]  V. Mathiowetz,et al.  Task Constraints and Functional Motor Performance of Individuals With and Without Multiple Sclerosis , 1995 .