Learning with Temporal Derivatives in Pulse-Coded Neuronal Systems

A number of learning models have recently been proposed which involve calculations of temporal differences (or derivatives in continuous-time models). These models, like most adaptive network models, are formulated in terms of frequency (or activation), a useful abstraction of neuronal firing rates. To more precisely evaluate the implications of a neuronal model, it may be preferable to develop a model which transmits discrete pulse-coded information. We point out that many functions and properties of neuronal processing and learning may depend, in subtle ways, on the pulse-coded nature of the information coding and transmission properties of neuron systems. When compared to formulations in terms of activation, computing with temporal derivatives (or differences) as proposed by Kosko (1986), Klopf (1988), and Sutton (1988), is both more stable and easier when reformulated for a more neuronally realistic pulse-coded system. In reformulating these models in terms of pulse-coding, our motivation has been to enable us to draw further parallels and connections between real-time behavioral models of learning and biological circuit models of the substrates underlying learning and memory.

[1]  B. McNaughton,et al.  Hebb-Marr networks and the neurobiological representation of action in space. , 1990 .

[2]  Richard F. Thompson The neurobiology of learning and memory. , 1986, Science.

[3]  G. Bower,et al.  From conditioning to category learning: an adaptive network model. , 1988 .

[4]  R. F. Thompson,et al.  Modeling the neural substrates of associative learning and memory: a computational approach. , 1987, Psychological review.

[5]  G. Bower,et al.  Evaluating an adaptive network model of human learning , 1988 .

[6]  B. Kosco Differential Hebbian learning , 1987 .

[7]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Learning internal representations by error propagation , 1986 .

[8]  A G Barto,et al.  Toward a modern theory of adaptive networks: expectation and prediction. , 1981, Psychological review.

[9]  R. Rescorla,et al.  A theory of Pavlovian conditioning : Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement , 1972 .

[10]  S. Kaplan The Physiology of Thought , 1950 .

[11]  Paul Horowitz,et al.  The Art of Electronics , 1980 .

[12]  L. Cooper,et al.  Molecular Mechanisms for Synaptic Modification in the Visual Cortex: Interaction between Theory and Experiment , 1989 .

[13]  Bernard Widrow,et al.  Adaptive switching circuits , 1988 .

[14]  P. Werbos,et al.  Beyond Regression : "New Tools for Prediction and Analysis in the Behavioral Sciences , 1974 .

[15]  Richard F. Thompson,et al.  Integrating Behavioral and Biological Models of Classical Conditioning , 1989 .

[16]  R. L. Brewster Adaptive Signal Processing , 1986 .

[17]  M. Gluck,et al.  Some biological implications of a differential-Hebbian learning rule , 1988, Psychobiology.

[18]  A. Klopf A neuronal model of classical conditioning , 1988 .