Search Dynamics in Consumer Choice under Time Pressure: An Eye-Tracking Study

We study decisions that involve choosing between different numbers of options under time pressure using eye-tracking to monitor the search process of the subjects. We find that subjects are quite adept at optimizing within the set of items that they see, that the initial search process is random in value, that subjects use a stopping rule to terminate the search process that combines features of optimal search and satisficing, and that subjects search more often in certain focal regions of the display, which leads to choice biases. (JEL C91, D12, M31)

[1]  R. Luce,et al.  Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis. , 1960 .

[2]  J. McCall.  Economics of Information and Job Search , 1970 .

[3]  Larry D. Rosen,et al.  An eye fixation analysis of multialternative choice , 1975, Memory & cognition.

[4]  V. Smith,et al.  Research in Experimental Economics , 1979 .

[5]  Boyan Jovanovic.  Job Matching and the Theory of Turnover , 1979, Journal of Political Economy.

[6]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis , 1979 .

[7]  A. Rubinstein.  Similarity and decision-making under risk (is there a utility theory resolution to the Allais paradox?) , 1988 .

[8]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  The adaptive decision maker , 1993 .

[9]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Cognition and framing in sequential bargaining for gains and losses , 1993 .

[10]  J. Hey,et al.  INVESTIGATING GENERALIZATIONS OF EXPECTED UTILITY THEORY USING EXPERIMENTAL DATA , 1994, Experiments in Economics.

[11]  J. E. Russo,et al.  An Eye-Fixation Analysis of Choice Processes for Consumer Nondurables , 1994 .

[12]  David W Harless,et al.  The predictive utility of generalized expected utility theories , 1994 .

[13]  Gerald L. Lohse,et al.  Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes a Comparison of Two Process Tracing Methods for Choice Tasks , 2022 .

[14]  A. John Maule,et al.  The effects of time pressure on human judgement and decision making , 1997 .

[15]  Gerald L. Lohse,et al.  Consumer Eye Movement Patterns on Yellow Pages Advertising , 1997 .

[16]  M. F. Luce,et al.  Constructive Consumer Choice Processes , 1998 .

[17]  Miguel A. Costa-Gomes,et al.  Cognition and Behavior in Normal-Form Games: An Experimental Study , 1998 .

[18]  R. Pieters,et al.  Visual Attention to Repeated Print Advertising: A Test of Scanpath Theory , 1999 .

[19]  M. Lepper,et al.  The Construction of Preference: When Choice Is Demotivating: Can One Desire Too Much of a Good Thing? , 2006 .

[20]  C. Koch,et al.  Computational modelling of visual attention , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[21]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Detecting Failures of Backward Induction: Monitoring Information Search in Sequential Bargaining , 2002, J. Econ. Theory.

[22]  Colin Camerer.  Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction , 2003 .

[23]  Miguel A. Costa-Gomes,et al.  Cognition and Behavior in Two-Person Guessing Games: An Experimental Study , 2003 .

[24]  Gur Huberman,et al.  How Much Choice is Too Much?: Contributions to 401(k) Retirement Plans , 2003 .

[25]  Rik Pieters,et al.  Attention Capture and Transfer in Advertising: Brand, Pictorial, and Text-Size Effects , 2004 .

[26]  Colin F. Camerer,et al.  Thinking about Attention in Games: Backward and Forward Induction , 2004 .

[27]  O. Mitchell,et al.  Pension design and structure : new lessons from behavioral finance , 2004 .

[28]  Colin F. Camerer,et al.  Pinocchio's Pupil: Using Eyetracking and Pupil Dilation To Understand Truth-telling and Deception in Games , 2006 .

[29]  David I. Laibson,et al.  Costly Information Acquisition: Experimental Analysis of a Boundedly Rational Model , 2006 .

[30]  Eric T. Bradlow,et al.  Measuring the Value of Point-of-Purchase Marketing with Commercial Eye-Tracking Data , 2006 .

[31]  S. Iyengar,et al.  The Dark Side of Choice: When Choice Impairs Social Welfare , 2006 .

[32]  J. O'Doherty,et al.  Orbitofrontal Cortex Encodes Willingness to Pay in Everyday Economic Transactions , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[33]  R. Aumann,et al.  Unraveling in Guessing Games : An Experimental Study , 2007 .

[34]  Lizzie Maughan,et al.  Like more, look more. Look more, like more: The evidence from eye-tracking , 2007 .

[35]  N. Wilcox.  Stochastic models for binary discrete choice under risk: a critical primer and econometric comparison , 2008 .

[36]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Dissociating the Role of the Orbitofrontal Cortex and the Striatum in the Computation of Goal Values and Prediction Errors , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[37]  Antonio Rangel,et al.  NEUROECONOMIC MODELS OF ECONOMIC DECISION MAKING^ The Impact of Computation Time and Experience on Decision Values , 2008 .

[38]  A. Rangel,et al.  Biasing simple choices by manipulating relative visual attention , 2008, Judgment and Decision Making.

[39]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Neuroeconomics: decision making and the brain , 2008 .

[40]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Pinocchio's Pupil: Using Eyetracking and Pupil Dilation to Understand Truth-Telling and Deception in Sender-Receiver Game , 2009 .

[41]  R. Hogarth,et al.  Satisfaction in choice as a function of the number of alternatives: When “goods satiate” , 2009 .

[42]  TA Hare,et al.  Self-control in decision-making involves modulation of the vmPFC valuation system , 2009, NeuroImage.

[43]  Colin F. Camerer,et al.  Studying learning in games using eye-tracking , 2009 .

[44]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Measuring Attention and Strategic Behavior in Games with Private Information , 2009 .

[45]  A. Rangel.  The Computation and Comparison of Value in Goal-directed Choice , 2009 .

[46]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Self-control in decision-making involves modulation of the vmPFC valuation system , 2009, NeuroImage.

[47]  Andrew Caplin,et al.  Choice Anomalies , Search , and Revealed Preference , 2009 .

[48]  Ian Krajbich,et al.  Visual fixations and the computation and comparison of value in simple choice , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[49]  Ariel Rubinstein.  Similarity and Decision Making Under Risk , 2010 .

[50]  Dmitri Kuksov,et al.  When More Alternatives Lead to Less Choice , 2010, Mark. Sci..

[51]  Daniel T. Knoepfle,et al.  Value Computations in Ventral Medial Prefrontal Cortex during Charitable Decision Making Incorporate Input from Regions Involved in Social Cognition , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[52]  Andrew Caplin,et al.  Search, choice, and revealed preference , 2011 .

[53]  Martijn C. Willemsen,et al.  Visiting the decision factory : observing cognition with MouselabWEB and other information acquisition methods , 2011 .

[54]  Ariel Rubinstein,et al.  Tracking Decision Makers under Uncertainty , 2011 .

[55]  Andrew Caplin,et al.  Search and Satisficing , 2011 .

[56]  Pietro Ortoleva,et al.  The price of flexibility: Towards a theory of Thinking Aversion , 2013, J. Econ. Theory.

[57]  ปิยดา สมบัติวัฒนา.  Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction , 2013 .