Stimulus Statistics Change Sounds from Near-Indiscriminable to Hyperdiscriminable

Objects and events in the sensory environment are generally predictable, making most of the energy impinging upon sensory transducers redundant. Given this fact, efficient sensory systems should detect, extract, and exploit predictability in order to optimize sensitivity to less predictable inputs that are, by definition, more informative. Not only are perceptual systems sensitive to changes in physical stimulus properties, but growing evidence reveals sensitivity both to relative predictability of stimuli and to co-occurrence of stimulus attributes within stimuli. Recent results revealed that auditory perception rapidly reorganizes to efficiently capture covariance among stimulus attributes. Acoustic properties per se were perceptually abandoned, and sounds were instead processed relative to patterns of co-occurrence. Here, we show that listeners’ ability to distinguish sounds from one another is driven primarily by the extent to which they are consistent or inconsistent with patterns of covariation among stimulus attributes and, to a lesser extent, whether they are heard frequently or infrequently. When sounds were heard frequently and deviated minimally from the prevailing pattern of covariance among attributes, they were poorly discriminated from one another. In stark contrast, when sounds were heard rarely and markedly violated the pattern of covariance, they became hyperdiscriminable with discrimination performance beyond apparent limits of the auditory system. Plausible cortical candidates underlying these dramatic changes in perceptual organization are discussed. These findings support efficient coding of stimulus statistical structure as a model for both perceptual and neural organization.

[1]  J. Werker,et al.  How Do Infants Become Experts at Native-Speech Perception? , 2012 .

[2]  J. Rauschecker,et al.  Processing of complex sounds in the macaque nonprimary auditory cortex. , 1995, Science.

[3]  Stephen McAdams,et al.  Separate Neural Processing of Timbre Dimensions in Auditory Sensory Memory , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[4]  H. B. Barlow,et al.  Possible Principles Underlying the Transformations of Sensory Messages , 2012 .

[5]  Brian R Glasberg,et al.  Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data , 1990, Hearing Research.

[6]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Canonical Microcircuits for Predictive Coding , 2012, Neuron.

[7]  Terence D. Sanger,et al.  Optimal unsupervised learning in a single-layer linear feedforward neural network , 1989, Neural Networks.

[8]  Gal Chechik,et al.  Reduction of Information Redundancy in the Ascending Auditory Pathway , 2006, Neuron.

[9]  I. Nelken,et al.  Processing of low-probability sounds by cortical neurons , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[10]  J. Rauschecker,et al.  Hierarchical Organization of the Human Auditory Cortex Revealed by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[11]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Sequential effects on the ERP in discriminating two stimuli , 1983, Biological Psychology.

[12]  I. Nelken,et al.  Multiple Time Scales of Adaptation in Auditory Cortex Neurons , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  Gal Chechik,et al.  Auditory abstraction from spectro-temporal features to coding auditory entities , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  Miguel Maravall,et al.  Adaptation and Sensory Coding , 2013 .

[15]  I. Winkler,et al.  Preattentive extraction of abstract feature conjunctions from auditory stimulation as reflected by the mismatch negativity (MMN). , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[16]  Eleanor Rosch,et al.  Principles of Categorization , 1978 .

[17]  Michael Kiefte,et al.  Sensitivity to change in perception of speech , 2003, Speech Commun..

[18]  Katherine S. White,et al.  A Statistical Basis for Speech Sound Discrimination , 2003, Language and speech.

[19]  M. Malmierca,et al.  The auditory novelty system: an attempt to integrate human and animal research. , 2014, Psychophysiology.

[20]  R. Näätänen,et al.  The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: A review , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[21]  Eero P. Simoncelli Vision and the statistics of the visual environment , 2003, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[22]  A. Lotto,et al.  Role of experience for language-specific functional mappings of vowel sounds. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  S. Holm A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure , 1979 .

[24]  Peter Földiák,et al.  Adaptation and decorrelation in the cortex , 1989 .

[25]  James M. Hillis,et al.  Combining Sensory Information: Mandatory Fusion Within, but Not Between, Senses , 2002, Science.

[26]  Christian E Stilp,et al.  Rapid efficient coding of correlated complex acoustic properties , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  X Wang,et al.  Temporal discharge patterns evoked by rapid sequences of wide- and narrowband clicks in the primary auditory cortex of cat. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  K. Reinikainen,et al.  Attentive novelty detection in humans is governed by pre-attentive sensory memory , 1994, Nature.

[29]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Natural image statistics and neural representation. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[30]  W. Geisler Visual perception and the statistical properties of natural scenes. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[31]  Mark A. Chevillet,et al.  Functional Correlates of the Anterolateral Processing Hierarchy in Human Auditory Cortex , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  Peter F. Assmann,et al.  The Perception of Speech Under Adverse Conditions , 2004 .

[33]  Michael Kiefte,et al.  Perception of Vowel Sounds Within a Biologically Realistic Model of Efficient Coding , 2013 .

[34]  F. Attneave Applications of information theory to psychology: A summary of basic concepts, methods, and results. , 1961 .

[35]  G. Christianson,et al.  Stimulus-Specific Adaptation Occurs in the Auditory Thalamus , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  Christian E Stilp,et al.  Non-isomorphism in efficient coding of complex sound properties. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  Biao Tian,et al.  Processing of frequency-modulated sounds in the lateral auditory belt cortex of the rhesus monkey. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[38]  L. Lisker Rapid versus rabid: A catalogue of acoustic features that may cue the distinction , 1977 .

[39]  Xiaoqin Wang,et al.  Contrast Tuning in Auditory Cortex , 2003, Science.

[40]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted. , 1978, Acta psychologica.

[41]  Olli Aaltonen,et al.  Event-related brain potentials and the perception of a phonetic continuum , 1987, Biological Psychology.

[42]  Xiaoqin Wang Neural coding strategies in auditory cortex , 2007, Hearing Research.

[43]  Keith R. Kluender,et al.  Perception of Speech Sounds , 2008 .

[44]  Jessica Maye,et al.  Infant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination , 2002, Cognition.

[45]  Daniel Bendor,et al.  Neural coding of periodicity in marmoset auditory cortex. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[46]  J. Kaas,et al.  Subdivisions of auditory cortex and processing streams in primates. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  M. Malmierca,et al.  Novelty detector neurons in the mammalian auditory midbrain , 2005, The European journal of neuroscience.

[48]  I. Nelken,et al.  Stimulus-specific adaptation beyond pure tones. , 2013, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[49]  R. Jacobs,et al.  Perception of speech reflects optimal use of probabilistic speech cues , 2008, Cognition.

[50]  F. Attneave Some informational aspects of visual perception. , 1954, Psychological review.

[51]  R. Patterson,et al.  The deterioration of hearing with age: frequency selectivity, the critical ratio, the audiogram, and speech threshold. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[52]  Keith R. Kluender,et al.  Virtues and perils of an empiricist approach to speech perception , 1999 .

[53]  Andrew J. R. Simpson,et al.  Selective Adaptation to “Oddball” Sounds by the Human Auditory System , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[54]  I. Nelken,et al.  Stimulus-Specific Adaptation in the Auditory Thalamus of the Anesthetized Rat , 2010, PloS one.

[55]  Xiaoqin Wang,et al.  Temporal and rate representations of time-varying signals in the auditory cortex of awake primates , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[56]  M. Malmierca,et al.  Stimulus-Specific Adaptation in the Inferior Colliculus of the Anesthetized Rat , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[57]  Keith R. Kluender,et al.  Efficient Coding and Statistically Optimal Weighting of Covariance among Acoustic Attributes in Novel Sounds , 2012, PloS one.

[58]  D. Bendor,et al.  The neuronal representation of pitch in primate auditory cortex , 2005, Nature.

[59]  K. Kluender Speech perception within a biologically realistic information‐theoretic framework. , 2008 .

[60]  B. Repp Phonetic trading relations and context effects: new experimental evidence for a speech mode of perception. , 1982, Psychological bulletin.