Assessing the impacts of automated mobility-on-demand through agent-based simulation: A study of Singapore

Abstract The advent of autonomous vehicle technologies and the emergence of new ride-sourcing business models has spurred interest in Automated Mobility-on-Demand (AMOD) as a prospective solution to meet the challenges of urbanization. AMOD has the potential of providing a convenient, reliable and affordable mobility service through more competitive cost structures enabled by autonomy (relative to existing services) and more efficient centralized fleet operations. However, the short and medium-term impacts of AMOD are as yet uncertain. On the one hand, it has the potential to alleviate congestion through increased ride-sharing and reduced car-ownership, and by complementing mass-transit. Conversely, AMOD may in fact worsen congestion due to induced demand, the cannibalization of public transit shares, and an increase in Vehicle-Kilometers Traveled (VKT) because of rebalancing and empty trips. This study attempts to systematically examine the impacts of AMOD on transportation in Singapore through agent-based simulation, modeling demand, supply and their interactions explicitly. On the demand side, we utilize an activity-based model system, that draws on data from a smartphone-based stated preferences survey conducted in Singapore. On the supply side, we model the operations of the AMOD fleet (including the assignment of requests to vehicles and rebalancing), which are integrated within a multimodal mesoscopic traffic simulator. Comprehensive simulations are conducted using a model of Singapore for the year 2030 and yield insights into the impacts of AMOD in dense transit-dependent cities from the perspective of the transportation planner, fleet operator, and user. The findings suggest that an unregulated introduction of AMOD can cause significant increases in network congestion and VKT, and have important policy implications that could potentially inform future deployments of AMOD.

[1]  R. Cervero,et al.  Just a better taxi? A survey-based comparison of taxis, transit, and ridesourcing services in San Francisco , 2016 .

[2]  Michael Hyland,et al.  Dynamic autonomous vehicle fleet operations: Optimization-based strategies to assign AVs to immediate traveler demand requests , 2018, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.

[3]  Yi Zhu,et al.  An integrated microsimulation approach to land-use and mobility modeling , 2018, Journal of Transport and Land Use.

[4]  Michal Maciejewski,et al.  Simulation of City-wide Replacement of Private Cars with Autonomous Taxis in Berlin , 2016, ANT/SEIT.

[5]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  From Traditional to Automated Mobility on Demand: A Comprehensive Framework for Modeling On-Demand Services in SimMobility , 2019 .

[6]  Yu Shen,et al.  Integrating shared autonomous vehicle in public transportation system: A supply-side simulation of the first-mile service in Singapore , 2018, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.

[7]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  SimMobility Mid-Term Simulator: A State of the Art Integrated Agent Based Demand and Supply Model , 2015 .

[8]  T. Donna Chen,et al.  Impact of ridesharing on operational efficiency of shared autonomous electric vehicle fleet , 2018, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.

[9]  John M. Rose,et al.  Demand for taxi services: new elasticity evidence , 2014 .

[10]  Michel Bierlaire,et al.  Forecasting the Demand for Electric Vehicles: Accounting for Attitudes and Perceptions , 2014, Transp. Sci..

[11]  Simon Oh,et al.  SimMobility Short-Term: An Integrated Microscopic Mobility Simulator , 2017 .

[12]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  SimMobility Freight: An agent-based urban freight simulator for evaluating logistics solutions , 2020, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review.

[13]  Carlos Lima Azevedo,et al.  Microsimulation of Demand and Supply of Autonomous Mobility On Demand , 2016 .

[14]  Ali Shamshiripour,et al.  Eliciting preferences for adoption of fully automated vehicles using best-worst analysis , 2018, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.

[15]  Emilio Frazzoli,et al.  On-demand high-capacity ride-sharing via dynamic trip-vehicle assignment , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  José Manuel Viegas,et al.  Assessing the impacts of deploying a shared self-driving urban mobility system: An agent-based model applied to the city of Lisbon, Portugal , 2017 .

[17]  Kara M. Kockelman,et al.  The Travel and Environmental Implications of Shared Autonomous Vehicles, Using Agent-Based Model Scenarios , 2014 .

[18]  Emilio Frazzoli,et al.  Toward a Systematic Approach to the Design and Evaluation of Automated Mobility-on-Demand Systems: A Case Study in Singapore , 2014 .

[19]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  The Multi-Agent Transport Simulation , 2016 .

[20]  Felix Becker,et al.  Fleet operational policies for automated mobility: A simulation assessment for Zurich , 2019, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.

[21]  Dinesh Gopinath,et al.  Travel demand model system for the information era , 1996 .

[22]  Alexander Erath,et al.  A Bayesian network approach for population synthesis , 2015 .

[23]  Wenwen Zhang,et al.  Exploring the impact of shared autonomous vehicles on urban parking demand: An agent-based simulation approach , 2015 .

[24]  Jinhua Zhao,et al.  Transit-oriented autonomous vehicle operation with integrated demand-supply interaction , 2018, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.

[25]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Automated Mobility-on-Demand vs. Mass Transit: A Multi-Modal Activity-Driven Agent-Based Simulation Approach , 2018 .

[26]  Kara M. Kockelman,et al.  Dynamic ride-sharing and fleet sizing for a system of shared autonomous vehicles in Austin, Texas , 2018 .

[27]  P. Santi,et al.  Addressing the minimum fleet problem in on-demand urban mobility , 2018, Nature.

[28]  Moshe Ben-Akiva Planning and Action in a Model of Choice , 2009 .

[29]  Paolo Santi,et al.  Supporting Information for Quantifying the Benefits of Vehicle Pooling with Shareability Networks Data Set and Pre-processing , 2022 .

[30]  J. Ferreira,et al.  Synthetic Population Generation at Disaggregated Spatial Scales for Land Use and Transportation Microsimulation , 2014 .

[31]  Christopher Zegras,et al.  Constructing a Synthetic Population of Establishments for the Simmobility Microsimulation Platform , 2016 .

[32]  Daniel J. Fagnant,et al.  Preparing a Nation for Autonomous Vehicles: Opportunities, Barriers and Policy Recommendations , 2015 .

[33]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Autonomous Vehicle Fleet Sizes Required to Serve Different Levels of Demand , 2016 .

[34]  Emilio Frazzoli,et al.  Simulation Framework for Rebalancing of Autonomous Mobility on Demand Systems , 2016 .

[35]  Marco Pavone,et al.  Control of robotic mobility-on-demand systems: A queueing-theoretical perspective , 2014, Int. J. Robotics Res..