Would You Mind Me if I Pass by You? : Socially-Appropriate Behaviour for an Omni-based Social Robot in Narrow Environment

Interacting physically with robots and sharing environment with them leads to situations where humans and robots have to cross each other in narrow corridors. In these cases, the robot has to make space for the human to pass. From observation of human-human crossing behaviours, we isolated two main factors in this avoiding behaviour: body rotation and sliding motion. We implemented a robot controller able to vary these factors and explored how this variation impacted on people's perception. Results from a within-participants study involving 23 participants show that people prefer a robot rotating its body when crossing them. Additionally, a sliding motion is rated as being warmer. These results show the importance of social avoidance when interacting with humans.

[1]  Amy J. C. Cuddy,et al.  Universal dimensions of social cognition: warmth and competence , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[2]  Daichi Yanagisawa,et al.  Body-rotation behavior of pedestrians for collision avoidance in passing and cross flow , 2019, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological.

[3]  Wolfram Burgard,et al.  Feature-Based Prediction of Trajectories for Socially Compliant Navigation , 2012, Robotics: Science and Systems.

[4]  Joachim Hertzberg,et al.  Globally consistent 3D mapping with scan matching , 2008, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[5]  T. Kanda,et al.  Social force model with explicit collision prediction , 2011 .

[6]  Dana Kulic,et al.  Measurement Instruments for the Anthropomorphism, Animacy, Likeability, Perceived Intelligence, and Perceived Safety of Robots , 2009, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[7]  Christian Laugier,et al.  From Proxemics Theory to Socially-Aware Navigation: A Survey , 2014, International Journal of Social Robotics.

[8]  Gonzalo Ferrer,et al.  Robot companion: A social-force based approach with human awareness-navigation in crowded environments , 2013, 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[9]  Helbing,et al.  Social force model for pedestrian dynamics. , 1995, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[10]  E. Hall,et al.  The Hidden Dimension , 1970 .

[11]  Marc Hanheide,et al.  Analysis of human-robot spatial behaviour applying a qualitative trajectory calculus , 2012, 2012 IEEE RO-MAN: The 21st IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[12]  Rachid Alami,et al.  A framework towards a socially aware Mobile Robot motion in Human-Centered dynamic environment , 2010, 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[13]  Peter Collett,et al.  Patterns of Public Behaviour: Collision Avoidance on a Pedestrian Crossing , 1974 .

[14]  Morton Goldman,et al.  Personal Space Violations as A Function of Height , 1981 .

[15]  Wolfram Burgard,et al.  The dynamic window approach to collision avoidance , 1997, IEEE Robotics Autom. Mag..

[16]  Rachid Alami,et al.  Human-aware robot navigation: A survey , 2013, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[17]  Maja J. Mataric,et al.  Autonomous human–robot proxemics: socially aware navigation based on interaction potential , 2016, Autonomous Robots.

[18]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Towards a Socially Acceptable Collision Avoidance for a Mobile Robot Navigating Among Pedestrians Using a Pedestrian Model , 2014, International Journal of Social Robotics.

[19]  Rachid Alami,et al.  A Human Aware Mobile Robot Motion Planner , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[20]  Ahmad M. Alghraibeh,et al.  Preferred Interpersonal Distances: A Global Comparison , 2017 .

[21]  Christian Laugier,et al.  Risk Based Navigation Decisions , 2012 .

[22]  Stanislav Ivanov,et al.  Adoption of robots and service automation by tourism and hospitality companies , 2017 .

[23]  R. Simmons,et al.  COMPANION: A Constraint-Optimizing Method for Person-Acceptable Navigation , 2009, RO-MAN 2009 - The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[24]  Steven J. Stroessner,et al.  The Robotic Social Attributes Scale (RoSAS): Development and Validation , 2017, 2017 12th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI.

[25]  Amy J. C. Cuddy,et al.  The dynamics of warmth and competence judgments, and their outcomes in organizations , 2011 .

[26]  Bilge Mutlu,et al.  Robots in organizations: The role of workflow, social, and environmental factors in human-robot interaction , 2008, 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).