A Correspondence Between Solution-State Dynamics of an Individual Protein and the Sequence and Conformational Diversity of its Family

Conformational ensembles are increasingly recognized as a useful representation to describe fundamental relationships between protein structure, dynamics and function. Here we present an ensemble of ubiquitin in solution that is created by sampling conformational space without experimental information using “Backrub” motions inspired by alternative conformations observed in sub-Angstrom resolution crystal structures. Backrub-generated structures are then selected to produce an ensemble that optimizes agreement with nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) Residual Dipolar Couplings (RDCs). Using this ensemble, we probe two proposed relationships between properties of protein ensembles: (i) a link between native-state dynamics and the conformational heterogeneity observed in crystal structures, and (ii) a relation between dynamics of an individual protein and the conformational variability explored by its natural family. We show that the Backrub motional mechanism can simultaneously explore protein native-state dynamics measured by RDCs, encompass the conformational variability present in ubiquitin complex structures and facilitate sampling of conformational and sequence variability matching those occurring in the ubiquitin protein family. Our results thus support an overall relation between protein dynamics and conformational changes enabling sequence changes in evolution. More practically, the presented method can be applied to improve protein design predictions by accounting for intrinsic native-state dynamics.

[1]  K. Takano.  ON SOLUTION OF , 1983 .

[2]  Christina Kiel,et al.  The ubiquitin domain superfold: structure-based sequence alignments and characterization of binding epitopes. , 2006, Journal of molecular biology.

[3]  L. Kay,et al.  Backbone dynamics of proteins as studied by 15N inverse detected heteronuclear NMR spectroscopy: application to staphylococcal nuclease. , 1989, Biochemistry.

[4]  W. Kabsch,et al.  Dictionary of protein secondary structure: Pattern recognition of hydrogen‐bonded and geometrical features , 1983, Biopolymers.

[5]  Andrew L. Lee,et al.  Conservation of side-chain dynamics within a protein family. , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[6]  Rafael Brüschweiler,et al.  Identification of slow correlated motions in proteins using residual dipolar and hydrogen-bond scalar couplings. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  James R. Apgar,et al.  Modeling backbone flexibility to achieve sequence diversity: the design of novel alpha-helical ligands for Bcl-xL. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  J H Prestegard,et al.  Structural and dynamic analysis of residual dipolar coupling data for proteins. , 2001, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[9]  Jack Snoeyink,et al.  Nucleic Acids Research Advance Access published April 22, 2007 MolProbity: all-atom contacts and structure validation for proteins and nucleic acids , 2007 .

[10]  R. Brüschweiler,et al.  Quantitative molecular ensemble interpretation of NMR dipolar couplings without restraints. , 2007, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[11]  Colin A. Smith,et al.  A simple model of backbone flexibility improves modeling of side-chain conformational variability. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[12]  Jens Meiler,et al.  Model-free analysis of protein backbone motion from residual dipolar couplings. , 2002, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[13]  L. Kay,et al.  Intrinsic dynamics of an enzyme underlies catalysis , 2005, Nature.

[14]  Mark A. Wilson,et al.  Intrinsic motions along an enzymatic reaction trajectory , 2007, Nature.

[15]  Ad Bax,et al.  Insights into the mobility of methyl-bearing side chains in proteins from (3)J(CC) and (3)J(CN) couplings. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[16]  D. Boehr,et al.  The Dynamic Energy Landscape of Dihydrofolate Reductase Catalysis , 2006, Science.

[17]  D. Baker,et al.  Design of a Novel Globular Protein Fold with Atomic-Level Accuracy , 2003, Science.

[18]  and David M. LeMaster,et al.  Dynamical Mapping of E. coli Thioredoxin via 13C NMR Relaxation Analysis , 1996 .

[19]  Andrew L. Lee,et al.  Ligand-dependent dynamics and intramolecular signaling in a PDZ domain. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[20]  John R Desjarlais,et al.  A de novo redesign of the WW domain , 2003, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[21]  J Meiler,et al.  Model-free approach to the dynamic interpretation of residual dipolar couplings in globular proteins. , 2001, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[22]  D. Baker,et al.  Native protein sequences are close to optimal for their structures. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  M. Levitt,et al.  The volume of atoms on the protein surface: calculated from simulation, using Voronoi polyhedra. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[24]  A. Bax,et al.  Direct measurement of distances and angles in biomolecules by NMR in a dilute liquid crystalline medium. , 1997, Science.

[25]  M Karplus,et al.  Relation between sequence and structure of HIV-1 protease inhibitor complexes: a model system for the analysis of protein flexibility. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[26]  A Joshua Wand,et al.  Changes in calmodulin main-chain dynamics upon ligand binding revealed by cross-correlated NMR relaxation measurements. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[27]  G. Crooks,et al.  WebLogo: a sequence logo generator. , 2004, Genome research.

[28]  J. Prestegard,et al.  NMR evidence for slow collective motions in cyanometmyoglobin , 1997, Nature Structural Biology.

[29]  A. Bonvin,et al.  NMR Relaxation and Internal Dynamics of Ubiquitin from a 0.2 μs MD Simulation. , 2005, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[30]  Stephen L Mayo,et al.  Computationally designed libraries of fluorescent proteins evaluated by preservation and diversity of function , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  Chaok Seok,et al.  A kinematic view of loop closure , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[32]  Oliver F. Lange,et al.  Self-consistent residual dipolar coupling based model-free analysis for the robust determination of nanosecond to microsecond protein dynamics , 2008, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[33]  A. Palmer,et al.  Backbone dynamics of Escherichia coli ribonuclease HI: correlations with structure and function in an active enzyme. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[34]  Rafael Brüschweiler,et al.  LOCALLY ANISOTROPIC INTERNAL POLYPEPTIDE BACKBONE DYNAMICS BY NMR RELAXATION , 1997 .

[35]  A. Szabó,et al.  Model-free approach to the interpretation of nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation in macromolecules. 1. Theory and range of validity , 1982 .

[36]  M. DePristo,et al.  Simultaneous determination of protein structure and dynamics , 2005, Nature.

[37]  D. Baker,et al.  An orientation-dependent hydrogen bonding potential improves prediction of specificity and structure for proteins and protein-protein complexes. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[38]  Elisabeth L. Humphris,et al.  Prediction of protein-protein interface sequence diversity using flexible backbone computational protein design. , 2008, Structure.

[39]  Frans A A Mulder,et al.  Correlated dynamics of consecutive residues reveal transient and cooperative unfolding of secondary structure in proteins. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  Christopher T. Saunders,et al.  Recapitulation of protein family divergence using flexible backbone protein design. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[41]  Jens Meiler,et al.  A Thorough Dynamic Interpretation of Residual Dipolar Couplings in Ubiquitin , 2006, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[42]  A. Palmer,et al.  Dynamics of ribonuclease H: temperature dependence of motions on multiple time scales. , 1996, Biochemistry.

[43]  Guoli Wang,et al.  PISCES: a protein sequence culling server , 2003, Bioinform..

[44]  Alejandra Leo-Macias,et al.  A new progressive-iterative algorithm for multiple structure alignment , 2005, Bioinform..

[45]  Brian K Shoichet,et al.  Testing a flexible-receptor docking algorithm in a model binding site. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[46]  Pau Bernadó,et al.  Anisotropic small amplitude Peptide plane dynamics in proteins from residual dipolar couplings. , 2004, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[47]  Hassan A. Karimi,et al.  oGNM: online computation of structural dynamics using the Gaussian Network Model , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..

[48]  S. Henikoff,et al.  Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[49]  Jens Meiler,et al.  DipoCoup: A versatile program for 3D-structure homology comparison based on residual dipolar couplings and pseudocontact shifts , 2000, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[50]  A Keith Dunker,et al.  Exploring the molecular design of protein interaction sites with molecular dynamics simulations and free energy calculations. , 2009, Biochemistry.

[51]  Brian D. Sykes,et al.  Measurement of 2H T1 and T1.rho. Relaxation Times in Uniformly 13C-Labeled and Fractionally 2H-Labeled Proteins in Solution , 1995 .

[52]  Vijay S Pande,et al.  Thoroughly sampling sequence space: Large‐scale protein design of structural ensembles , 2002, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[53]  Sandor Vajda,et al.  Ensemble modeling of substrate binding to cytochromes P450: analysis of catalytic differences between CYP1A orthologs. , 2007, Biochemistry.

[54]  H Kono,et al.  Statistical Theory for Protein Combinatorial Libraries , 2001 .

[55]  G. Marius Clore,et al.  Amplitudes of Protein Backbone Dynamics and Correlated Motions in a Small α/β Protein: Correspondence of Dipolar Coupling and Heteronuclear Relaxation Measurements† , 2004 .

[56]  Vijay S Pande,et al.  Increased detection of structural templates using alignments of designed sequences , 2003, Proteins.

[57]  Charles K. Fisher,et al.  Visualizing spatially correlated dynamics that directs RNA conformational transitions , 2007, Nature.

[58]  L. Kay,et al.  Orienting domains in proteins using dipolar couplings measured by liquid-state NMR: differences in solution and crystal forms of maltodextrin binding protein loaded with beta-cyclodextrin. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[59]  Jeffrey J. Gray,et al.  Conformer selection and induced fit in flexible backbone protein-protein docking using computational and NMR ensembles. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[60]  Hao Hu,et al.  Increased rigidity of eglin c at acidic pH: evidence from NMR spin relaxation and MD simulations. , 2003, Biochemistry.

[61]  Nikolay V Dokholyan,et al.  Deciphering protein dynamics from NMR data using explicit structure sampling and selection. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[62]  M. DePristo,et al.  Relation between native ensembles and experimental structures of proteins. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[63]  Ian W. Davis,et al.  The backrub motion: how protein backbone shrugs when a sidechain dances. , 2006, Structure.

[64]  M Gerstein,et al.  Volume changes on protein folding. , 1994, Structure.

[65]  Andrew L. Lee,et al.  Redistribution and loss of side chain entropy upon formation of a calmodulin–peptide complex , 2000, Nature Structural Biology.

[66]  Peter E Wright,et al.  Structure, dynamics, and catalytic function of dihydrofolate reductase. , 2004, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[67]  M. Karplus,et al.  Multiple conformational states of proteins: a molecular dynamics analysis of myoglobin. , 1987, Science.

[68]  G. Lipari.  Model-free approach to the interpretation of nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation in macromolecules , 1982 .

[69]  Charles D Schwieters,et al.  Amplitudes of protein backbone dynamics and correlated motions in a small alpha/beta protein: correspondence of dipolar coupling and heteronuclear relaxation measurements. , 2004, Biochemistry.

[70]  M. Betancourt,et al.  Efficient Monte Carlo trial moves for polypeptide simulations. , 2005, The Journal of chemical physics.

[71]  Jens Meiler,et al.  Side-chain orientation and hydrogen-bonding imprint supra-Tau(c) motion on the protein backbone of ubiquitin. , 2005, Angewandte Chemie.

[72]  G. Clore,et al.  Concordance of residual dipolar couplings, backbone order parameters and crystallographic B-factors for a small alpha/beta protein: a unified picture of high probability, fast atomic motions in proteins. , 2006, Journal of molecular biology.

[73]  J G Saven,et al.  Statistical theory for protein combinatorial libraries. Packing interactions, backbone flexibility, and the sequence variability of a main-chain structure. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[74]  D. A. Bosco,et al.  Enzyme Dynamics During Catalysis , 2002, Science.

[75]  Ian W. Davis,et al.  Structure validation by Cα geometry: ϕ,ψ and Cβ deviation , 2003, Proteins.

[76]  Oliver F. Lange,et al.  Recognition Dynamics Up to Microseconds Revealed from an RDC-Derived Ubiquitin Ensemble in Solution , 2008, Science.

[77]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Folding funnels and binding mechanisms. , 1999, Protein engineering.

[78]  R. Jernigan,et al.  Proteins with similar architecture exhibit similar large-scale dynamic behavior. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[79]  G. Petsko,et al.  Conformational substates in a protein: structure and dynamics of metmyoglobin at 80 K. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[80]  D. Boehr,et al.  How Do Proteins Interact? , 2008, Science.

[81]  Julian Echave,et al.  Exploring the common dynamics of homologous proteins. Application to the globin family. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[82]  X. Salvatella,et al.  The MUMO (minimal under-restraining minimal over-restraining) method for the determination of native state ensembles of proteins , 2007, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[83]  Bruce Randall Donald,et al.  Algorithm for backrub motions in protein design , 2008, ISMB.

[84]  M. Karplus,et al.  Effective energy function for proteins in solution , 1999, Proteins.

[85]  Colin A. Smith,et al.  Backrub-like backbone simulation recapitulates natural protein conformational variability and improves mutant side-chain prediction. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[86]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Folding and binding cascades: shifts in energy landscapes. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[87]  Feng Ding,et al.  Correction: Emergence of Protein Fold Families through Rational Design , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[88]  Georgia Hadjipavlou,et al.  Linkage between dynamics and catalysis in a thermophilic-mesophilic enzyme pair , 2004, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[89]  D. Case,et al.  Evaluating rotational diffusion from protein MD simulations. , 2008, The journal of physical chemistry. B.