Effects of Genioglossal Muscle Advancement on Speech: An Acoustic Study of Vowel Sounds

OBJECTIVE: The effects of the genioglossal muscle advancement on phonetic quality of speech were studied analyzing the acoustic features of vowel sounds. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: The study group consisted of 5 men suffering from partial upper airway obstruction during sleep. To prevent tongue base collapse, genioglossal muscle advancement was made with chin osteotomy without hyoid myotomy and suspension. The speech material consisted of 8 vowels produced in sentence context repeated 10 times before the operation, and 10 days and 6 weeks after the operation. The acoustic features of vowels were analyzed. RESULTS: The operation had no significant effects on vowel quality. Only for 2 of the subjects the pitches changed systematically due to the operation. CONCLUSION: According to the acoustic analysis, genioglossal muscle advancement with chin osteotomy has no effects on vowel production. Some short-term changes were observed, but these changes were highly individual. SIGNIFICANCE: The operation seems to have no potential to change vowel production.

[1]  J. Flanagan.  Speech Analysis, Synthesis and Perception , 1971 .

[2]  C Y Espy-Wilson,et al.  Articulatory tradeoffs reduce acoustic variability during American English /r/ production. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  C. Guilleminault,et al.  Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: a surgical protocol for dynamic upper airway reconstruction. , 1993, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[4]  Gunnar Fant,et al.  Acoustic Theory Of Speech Production , 1960 .

[5]  B. Lindblom,et al.  Acoustical consequences of lip, tongue, jaw, and larynx movement. , 1970, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  Frank H. Guenther,et al.  Speech motor control: Acoustic goals, saturation effects, auditory feedback and internal models , 1997, Speech Commun..

[7]  F. Guenther,et al.  A theoretical investigation of reference frames for the planning of speech movements. , 1998, Psychological review.

[8]  Nabil Samman,et al.  Acoustic and perceptual analysis of the sibilant sound /s/ before and after orthognathic surgery. , 2002, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[9]  A. Meltzoff,et al.  Infant vocalizations in response to speech: vocal imitation and developmental change. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.