Please Scroll down for Article Journal of the Learning Sciences Promoting Transfer by Grounding Complex Systems Principles

Understanding scientific phenomena in terms of complex systems principles is both scientifically and pedagogically important. Situations from different disciplines of science are often governed by the same principle, and so promoting knowledge transfer across disciplines makes valuable cross-fertilization and scientific unification possible. Although evidence for this kind of transfer has historically been controversial, experiments and observations of students suggest pedagogical methods for promoting transfer of complex systems principles. One powerful strategy is for students to actively interpret the elements and interactions of perceptually grounded scenarios. Such interpretation can be facilitated through the presentation of a situation alongside a description of how the agents in the situation are behaving, and by students exploring and constructing computational models of the situation. The resulting knowledge can be both concretely grounded yet highly perspective dependent and generalizeable. We discuss methods for coordinating computational and mental models of complex systems, the roles of idealization and concreteness in fostering understanding and generalization, and other complementary theoretical approaches to achieving transfer.

[1]  Joao Antonio Pereira,et al.  Linked: The new science of networks , 2002 .

[2]  Michael Batty,et al.  Fractal Cities: A Geometry of Form and Function , 1996 .

[3]  Uri Wilensky,et al.  Inventing a “Mid Level” to Make Ends Meet: Reasoning between the Levels of Complexity , 2008 .

[4]  Vladimir M Sloutsky,et al.  The Advantage of Abstract Examples in Learning Math , 2008, Science.

[5]  A. J. Lotka,et al.  Elements of Physical Biology. , 1925, Nature.

[6]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Reuniting perception and conception , 1998, Cognition.

[7]  R. Sternberg Advances in the psychology of human intelligence , 1982 .

[8]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Schema induction and analogical transfer , 1983, Cognitive Psychology.

[9]  Christine D. Wilson,et al.  Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[10]  Kenneth D. Forbus,et al.  The Roles of Similarity in Transfer: Separating Retrievability From Inferential Soundness , 1993, Cognitive Psychology.

[11]  Keith J Holyoak,et al.  Pragmatic reasoning schemas , 1985, Cognitive Psychology.

[12]  W. J. Humphreys Snow Crystals , 1962 .

[13]  R. Felder,et al.  Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education. , 1988 .

[14]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Analogical problem solving , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[15]  D. Gentner,et al.  USE OF STRUCTURE MAPPING THEORY FOR COMPLEX SYSTEMS. , 1986 .

[16]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Why we’re so smart , 2003 .

[17]  D. North Competing Technologies , Increasing Returns , and Lock-In by Historical Events , 1994 .

[18]  F. Reif,et al.  Problem solving and education: Issues in teaching and research , 1980 .

[19]  J. Greeno Authoritative, Accountable Positioning and Connected, General Knowing: Progressive Themes in Understanding Transfer , 2006 .

[20]  Adele Diamond,et al.  Faculty Opinions recommendation of Early understanding and use of symbols: the model model. , 2002 .

[21]  D. Gentner,et al.  Respects for similarity , 1993 .

[22]  Walter G. Rosen,et al.  The End of Science: Facing the Limits of Knowledge in the Twilight of the Scientific Age , 1996 .

[23]  L. R. Novick Analogical transfer, problem similarity, and expertise. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[24]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .

[25]  Uri Wilensky,et al.  ConnectedScience: Learning Biology through Constructing and Testing Computational Theories -- an Embodied Modeling Approach , 1998 .

[26]  Eric Klopfer,et al.  Technologies to support the creation of complex systems models--using StarLogo software with students. , 2003, Bio Systems.

[27]  B. R. Bugelski,et al.  The role of frequency in developing perceptual sets. , 1961, Canadian journal of psychology.

[28]  Judy S. DeLoache,et al.  Symbolic functioning in preschool children , 1994 .

[29]  Richard Lowe,et al.  Interrogation of a dynamic visualization during learning , 2004 .

[30]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  Analog Imagery in Mental Model Reasoning: Depictive Models , 1996, Cognitive Psychology.

[31]  Stephen K. Reed,et al.  The role of analogy in transfer between similar problem states , 1974 .

[32]  Yaneer Bar-Yam,et al.  Dynamics Of Complex Systems , 2019 .

[33]  Uri Wilensky,et al.  Learning through participatory simulations: network-based design for systems learning in classrooms , 1999, CSCL.

[34]  Celia Hoyles,et al.  Learning mathematics and logo , 1992 .

[35]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Problem solving and education. , 1980 .

[36]  M. Hegarty Mechanical reasoning by mental simulation , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[37]  David M. Raup,et al.  How Nature Works: The Science of Self-Organized Criticality , 1997 .

[38]  Sergio E. Chaigneau,et al.  THE SIMILARITY-IN-TOPOGRAPHY PRINCIPLE: RECONCILING THEORIES OF CONCEPTUAL DEFICITS , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[39]  Kenneth R. Livingston,et al.  Categorical perception effects induced by category learning. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[40]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Computational models of collective behavior , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[41]  J. Davidoff,et al.  Color categories are not universal: replications and new evidence from a stone-age culture. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[42]  Miriam Bassok,et al.  Adding Apples and Oranges: Alignment of Semantic and Formal Knowledge , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[43]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  EFFICIENCY AND INNOVATION IN TRANSFER , 2005 .

[44]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Commonsense Conceptions of Emergent Processes: Why Some Misconceptions Are Robust , 2005 .

[45]  Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver,et al.  Comparing expert and novice understanding of a complex system from the perspective of structures, behaviors, and functions , 2004, Cogn. Sci..

[46]  Dor Abrahamson,et al.  There Once Was a 9-Block …- A Middle-School Design for Probability and Statistics , 2006 .

[47]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[48]  C. Judd,et al.  The relation of special training and general intelligence , 1908 .

[49]  Uri Wilensky,et al.  GasLab—an Extensible Modeling Toolkit for Connecting Micro-and Macro-properties of Gases , 1999 .

[50]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Where Mathematics Comes From , 2000 .

[51]  R. Shepard Ecological constraints on internal representation: resonant kinematics of perceiving, imagining, thinking, and dreaming. , 1984, Psychological review.

[52]  Narendra Ahuja,et al.  Learning to recognize objects , 2000, Proceedings IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2000 (Cat. No.PR00662).

[53]  U. Netlogo Wilensky,et al.  Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling , 1999 .

[54]  J. Hadamard,et al.  The Psychology of Invention in the Mathematical Field. , 1945 .

[55]  J. Deloache Symbolic functioning in very young children: understanding of pictures and models. , 1991, Child development.

[56]  D. Herrmann,et al.  Problem perception and knowledge structure in expert and novice mathematical problem solvers. , 1982 .

[57]  D. KORNHAUSER,et al.  VISUALIZATION TOOLS FOR AGENT-BASED MODELING IN NETLOGO , 2007 .

[58]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[59]  Lloyd P. Rieber,et al.  Discovery learning, representation, and explanation within a computer-based simulation: finding the right mix , 2004 .

[60]  Seymour Papert,et al.  What's the big idea? Toward a pedagogy of idea power , 2000, IBM Syst. J..

[61]  Charles Cole,et al.  Fluid concepts and creative analogies: Computer models of the fundamental mechanisms of thought , 1996 .

[62]  Per Bak,et al.  How Nature Works: The Science of Self‐Organized Criticality , 1997 .

[63]  Per Bak,et al.  How Nature Works , 1996 .

[64]  M. Batty Generative social science: Studies in agent-based computational modeling , 2008 .

[65]  C. D. Gelatt,et al.  Optimization by Simulated Annealing , 1983, Science.

[66]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Emergent Processes in Group Behavior , 2022 .

[67]  A. J. Lotka Elements of Physical Biology. , 1925, Nature.

[68]  Vanessa Colella,et al.  Participatory Simulations: Building Collaborative Understanding Through Immersive Dynamic Modeling , 2000 .

[69]  Lauretta M. Reeves,et al.  The Role of Content and Abstract Information in Analogical Transfer , 1994 .

[70]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Learning by Analogical Bootstrapping , 2001 .

[71]  Richard Lowe,et al.  Animation and learning: selective processing of information in dynamic graphics , 2003 .

[72]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Whither structured representation? , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[73]  Margaret A. Boden,et al.  Douglas Hofstadter and the Fluid Analogies Research Group, Fluid Concepts and Creative Analogies: Computer Models of the Fundamental Mechanisms of Thought , 2004, Minds and Machines.

[74]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices , 1981, Cogn. Sci..

[75]  Ference Marton,et al.  Sameness and Difference in Transfer , 2006 .

[76]  B. L. Whorf Languages and logic , 1956 .

[77]  D. Perkins,et al.  Rocky Roads to Transfer: Rethinking Mechanism of a Neglected Phenomenon , 1989 .

[78]  Celia Hoyles,et al.  Windows on Mathematical Meanings: Learning Cultures and Computers , 1996 .

[79]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  Chapter 3: Rethinking Transfer: A Simple Proposal With Multiple Implications , 1999 .

[80]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Altering object representations through category learning , 2001, Cognition.

[81]  WM. GEE,et al.  Snow Crystals , 1901, Nature.

[82]  Lloyd P. Rieber,et al.  Computer-based microworlds: A bridge between constructivism and direct instruction , 1992 .

[83]  Mike Stieff,et al.  Connected Chemistry—Incorporating Interactive Simulations into the Chemistry Classroom , 2003 .

[84]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  A Wrinkle in Time , 2008, Psychological science.

[85]  Thomas C. Halsey,et al.  Diffusion‐Limited Aggregation: A Model for Pattern Formation , 2000 .

[86]  Celia Hoyles,et al.  Windows on Mathematical Meanings , 1996 .

[87]  Paul Meakin,et al.  Growth Patterns in Physical Sciences and Biology , 1993 .

[88]  J. Deloache,et al.  Manipulatives as symbols: A new perspective on the use of concrete objects to teach mathematics , 1997 .

[89]  H. Engel,et al.  Chemical Waves and Patterns , 1996 .

[90]  M. Chi,et al.  From things to processes: A theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts , 1994 .

[91]  Richard Lehrer,et al.  New Habits of Mind@@@Designing Learning Environments for Developing Understanding of Geometry and Space , 2000 .

[92]  Susan M. Barnett,et al.  When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer. , 2002, Psychological bulletin.

[93]  U. Wilensky,et al.  Complex Systems in Education: Scientific and Educational Importance and Implications for the Learning Sciences , 2006 .

[94]  J. Kolodner Educational implications of analogy. A view from case-based reasoning. , 1997, The American psychologist.

[95]  Paulo Blikstein,et al.  Less is More: Agent-Based Simulation as a Powerful Learning Tool in Materials Science , 2005 .

[96]  Judy S. DeLoache,et al.  When a picture is not worth a thousand words: Young children's understanding of pictures and models , 1992 .

[97]  I. Lakatos PROOFS AND REFUTATIONS (I)*† , 1963, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[98]  R. Leeper A Study of a Neglected Portion of the Field of Learning—the Development of Sensory Organization , 1935 .

[99]  John H. Miller,et al.  Complex adaptive systems - an introduction to computational models of social life , 2009, Princeton studies in complexity.

[100]  Raymond M. Smullyan 5000 B.C. and other philosophical fantasies , 1983 .

[101]  Robert C. Wicklein,et al.  Case Studies of Multidisciplinary Approaches to Integrating Mathematics, Science and TechnologyEducation , 1995 .

[102]  Stuart A. Kauffman,et al.  The origins of order , 1993 .

[103]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  How abstract is symbolic thought? , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[104]  A. Clark Embodied, Situated, and Distributed Cognition , 1999 .

[105]  U. Wilensky,et al.  Thinking Like a Wolf, a Sheep, or a Firefly: Learning Biology Through Constructing and Testing Computational Theories—An Embodied Modeling Approach , 2006 .

[106]  W. Thurston On Proof and Progress in Mathematics , 1994, math/9404236.

[107]  A. Collins,et al.  Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .

[108]  P. A. Kolers,et al.  Procedures of mind. , 1984 .

[109]  L. Boroditsky Does Language Shape Thought?: Mandarin and English Speakers' Conceptions of Time , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.

[110]  Joshua M. Epstein,et al.  Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science from the Bottom Up , 1996 .

[111]  R. A. Engle Framing Interactions to Foster Generative Learning: A Situative Explanation of Transfer in a Community of Learners Classroom , 2006 .

[112]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  The simultaneous evolution of author and paper networks , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[113]  Thomas T. Hills,et al.  Search in External and Internal Spaces , 2008, Psychological science.

[114]  Robert L. Goldstone Influences of categorization on perceptual discrimination. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[115]  J. M. Ottino,et al.  Engineering complex systems , 2004, Nature.

[116]  D. Medin,et al.  The specific character of abstract thought: Categorization, problem-solving, and induction: Volume 5 , 1989 .

[117]  B. Ross This is like that: The use of earlier problems and the separation of similarity effects. , 1987 .

[118]  Richard Catrambone,et al.  Making the abstract concrete: Visualizing mathematical solution procedures , 2006, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[119]  Alexander Repenning,et al.  Making Constructionism Work in the Classroom , 2003, Int. J. Comput. Math. Learn..

[120]  J. Mestre Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective , 2005 .

[121]  MICHAEL J. JACOBSON,et al.  Problem solving, cognition, and complex systems: Differences between experts and novices , 2001, Complex..

[122]  D. Detterman The case for the prosecution: Transfer as an epiphenomenon. , 1996 .

[123]  Mitchel Resnick,et al.  Beyond the Centralized Mindset , 1996 .

[124]  Brent A. Olde,et al.  How does one know whether a person understands a device? The quality of the questions the person asks when the device breaks down. , 2003 .

[125]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implica-tions , 1999 .

[126]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  Shuttling Between Depictive Models and Abstract Rules: Induction and Fallback , 1996, Cogn. Sci..

[127]  D. Gentner,et al.  Learning and Transfer: A General Role for Analogical Encoding , 2003 .

[128]  Terezinha Nunes,et al.  Mathematics learning as the socialization of the mind , 1999 .

[129]  Charles Wells,et al.  Varieties of mathematical prose , 1998 .

[130]  Martha W. Alibali,et al.  The Symbol Precedence View of Mathematical Development: A Corpus Analysis of the Rhetorical Structure of Textbooks , 2002 .

[131]  J. Lave Cognition in Practice: Outdoors: a social anthropology of cognition in practice , 1988 .

[132]  G. Dosi,et al.  Technical Change and Economic Theory , 1989 .

[133]  D L Gilden,et al.  1/f noise in human cognition. , 1995, Science.

[134]  Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda,et al.  Child psychology : a handbook of contemporary issues , 2005 .

[135]  Richard E. Clark,et al.  Blueprints for complex learning: The 4C/ID-model , 2002 .

[136]  Ann L. Brown Analogical learning and transfer: what develops? , 1989 .

[137]  Seymour Papert,et al.  Teaching Children to be Mathematicians vs. Teaching About Mathematics. Artificial Intelligence Memo Number 249. , 1971 .

[138]  S. Schwan,et al.  The cognitive benefits of interactive videos: learning to tie nautical knots , 2004 .

[139]  Sasha A. Barab,et al.  Curriculum-Based Ecosystems: Supporting Knowing From an Ecological Perspective , 2006 .

[140]  D. Gentner The development of relational category knowledge , 2005 .

[141]  Ji Yeon Son,et al.  A well-grounded education: the role of perception in science and mathematics , 2008 .

[142]  M. Heim Virtual Realism , 1998 .

[143]  Luciano Meira,et al.  Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (19th, Recife, Brazil, July 22-27, 1995), Volume 2. , 1995 .

[144]  J. M. Grady Virtual Reality: Computers Mimic the Physical World , 1998 .

[145]  J. Hadamard,et al.  The Psychology of Invention in the Mathematical Field. , 1945 .

[146]  M. Hegarty Dynamic visualizations and learning: getting to the difficult questions , 2004 .

[147]  Richard Lehrer,et al.  Designing learning environments for developing understanding of geometry and space , 1998 .

[148]  Emre Özgen Language, Learning, and Color Perception , 2004 .

[149]  Jacques Hadamard,et al.  The Psychology of Invention in the Mathematical Field. , 1949 .

[150]  J. Deloache Dual representation and young children's use of scale models. , 2000, Child development.

[151]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[152]  Steven L. Lytinen,et al.  Agent-based Simulation Platforms: Review and Development Recommendations , 2006, Simul..

[153]  Uri Wilensky,et al.  GasLab—an Extensible Modeling Toolkit for Exploring Micro- and Macro- Views of Gases , 1999 .

[154]  Paulo Blikstein,et al.  A Case Study Of Multi Agent Based Simulation In Undergraduate Materials Science Education , 2006 .

[155]  Laura R Novick Understanding Spatial Diagram Structure: An Analysis of Hierarchies, Matrices, and Networks , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[156]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Pragmatic versus syntactic approaches to training deductive reasoning , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[157]  Keith J. Holyoak,et al.  Interdomain Transfer Between Isomorphic Topics in Algebra and Physics , 2004 .

[158]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  The Transfer of Scientific Principles Using Concrete and Idealized Simulations , 2005, Journal of the Learning Sciences.

[159]  Shaaron Ainsworth,et al.  The effects of self-explaining when learning with text or diagrams , 2003, Cogn. Sci..

[160]  John R. Koza,et al.  Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity. , 1995, Artificial Life.

[161]  David W. Carraher,et al.  The Transfer Dilemma , 2002 .

[162]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Preschool children can learn to transfer: Learning to learn and learning from example , 1988, Cognitive Psychology.

[163]  Uri Wilensky Emergent Entities and Emergent Processes: Constructing Emergence through Multi-Agent Programming. , 2001 .

[164]  Stephen Wolfram,et al.  A New Kind of Science , 2003, Artificial Life.

[165]  A. diSessa,et al.  What changes in conceptual change , 1998 .

[166]  B. Ross Distinguishing Types of Superficial Similarities: Different Effects on the Access and Use of Earlier Problems , 1989 .

[167]  David H. Uttal,et al.  Taking a hard look at concreteness: Do concrete objects help young children to learn symbolic relations? , 2000 .

[168]  Uriel Joseph Wilensky,et al.  Connected mathematics : builiding concrete relationships with mathematical knowledge , 1993 .

[169]  M. Hegarty Mental animation: inferring motion from static displays of mechanical systems. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[170]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  ' s personal copy Simplicity and generalization : Short-cutting abstraction in children ’ s object categorizations , 1997 .

[171]  R. Shepard Ecological constraints on internal representation: resonant kinematics of perceiving, imagining, thinking, and dreaming. , 1984, Psychological review.

[172]  MAURICE CROSLAND,et al.  Foundations of Science , 1970, Nature.

[173]  M. Resnick,et al.  Diving into Complexity: Developing Probabilistic Decentralized Thinking through Role-Playing Activities. , 1998 .

[174]  M. Resnick,et al.  Thinking in Levels: A Dynamic Systems Approach to Making Sense of the World , 1999 .

[175]  Seymour Papert,et al.  An exploration in the space of mathematics educations , 1996, Int. J. Comput. Math. Learn..

[176]  L. R. Novick Analogical transfer, problem similarity, and expertise. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[177]  I. Lakatos,et al.  Proofs and Refutations: Frontmatter , 1976 .

[178]  David E. Penner,et al.  Explaining systems: Investigating middle school students' understanding of emergent phenomena , 2000 .

[179]  James D. Slotta,et al.  Helping Students Understand Challenging Topics in Science Through Ontology Training , 2006 .

[180]  R. Mayer Teaching of subject matter. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[181]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  The transfer of abstract principles governing complex adaptive systems , 2003, Cognitive Psychology.

[182]  A. Schoenfeld Learning to Think Mathematically: Problem Solving, Metacognition, and Sense Making in Mathematics (Reprint) , 2009 .

[183]  M. Bassok Using Content to Interpret Structure: Effects on Analogical Transfer , 1996 .

[184]  U. Wilensky Abstract Meditations on the Concrete and Concrete Implications for Mathematics Education , 1991 .