A control theoretic approach to robot-assisted locomotor therapy

This paper proposes a control theoretic strategy for human walking gait assistance based on underactuated potential energy shaping. We design a simple control law that lessens the perceived weight of the patient's center of mass through a robotic ankle-foot orthosis (AFO) with one actuated degree-of-freedom. We then adopt a passive “compass-gait” bipedal walker as an implicit model of human locomotor behavior, which we simulate to draw beneficial implications for rehabilitation such as energy regulation, improved stability, and progressive training by Lyapunov funneling. Given current challenges in developing effective robot-assisted locomotor therapies, this paper offers a novel systematic approach to control strategy design for gait training and at-home assistance.

[1]  Eric Loth,et al.  A pneumatic power harvesting ankle-foot orthosis to prevent foot-drop , 2009, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[2]  Naomi Ehrich Leonard,et al.  Controlled Lagrangians and the stabilization of mechanical systems. II. Potential shaping , 2001, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[3]  H. Pontzer,et al.  Chimpanzee locomotor energetics and the origin of human bipedalism , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Tad McGeer,et al.  Passive Dynamic Walking , 1990, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[5]  A. Minetti,et al.  Energy cost of walking and running at extreme uphill and downhill slopes. , 2002, Journal of applied physiology.

[6]  Robert Riener,et al.  Generalized elasticities improve patient-cooperative control of rehabilitation robots , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[7]  W R Leonard,et al.  Energetic efficiency of human bipedality. , 1995, American journal of physical anthropology.

[8]  賢二 鈴木.  慢性副鼻腔炎に対するrandomized controlled study , 2002 .

[9]  Romeo Ortega,et al.  Stabilization of a class of underactuated mechanical systems via interconnection and damping assignment , 2002, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[10]  Andy Ruina,et al.  Energetic Consequences of Walking Like an Inverted Pendulum: Step-to-Step Transitions , 2005, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[11]  Arthur D. Kuo,et al.  Choosing Your Steps Carefully , 2007, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[12]  Hermano Igo Krebs,et al.  Robot-Aided Neurorehabilitation: A Novel Robot for Ankle Rehabilitation , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[13]  Hermano Igo Krebs,et al.  Therapeutic Robotics: A Technology Push , 2006, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[14]  E. Westervelt,et al.  Feedback Control of Dynamic Bipedal Robot Locomotion , 2007 .

[15]  S. Hesse,et al.  Influence of walking speed on lower limb muscle activity and energy consumption during treadmill walking of hemiparetic patients. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[16]  Homayoon Kazerooni,et al.  Exoskeletons for Human Performance Augmentation , 2008, Springer Handbook of Robotics.

[17]  J. Hidler,et al.  Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Lokomat in Subacute Stroke , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[18]  Robert D. Gregg,et al.  Reduction-based Control of Three-dimensional Bipedal Walking Robots , 2010, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[19]  Martijn Wisse,et al.  A Three-Dimensional Passive-Dynamic Walking Robot with Two Legs and Knees , 2001, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[20]  Timothy Bretl,et al.  Asymptotically stable gait primitives for planning dynamic bipedal locomotion in three dimensions , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[21]  S.K. Agrawal,et al.  Assessment of Motion of a Swing Leg and Gait Rehabilitation With a Gravity Balancing Exoskeleton , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[22]  Benoit Thuilot,et al.  Compass-Like Biped Robot Part I : Stability and Bifurcation of Passive Gaits , 1996 .

[23]  M. Spong,et al.  CONTROLLED SYMMETRIES AND PASSIVE WALKING , 2002 .

[24]  Daniel E. Koditschek,et al.  Sequential Composition of Dynamically Dexterous Robot Behaviors , 1999, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[25]  R. Riener,et al.  A Novel Mechatronic Body Weight Support System , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[26]  T. Demott,et al.  Enhanced Gait-Related Improvements After Therapist- Versus Robotic-Assisted Locomotor Training in Subjects With Chronic Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Study , 2008, Stroke.

[27]  D. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury , 2009, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.