An FPTAS for Bargaining Networks with Unequal Bargaining Powers

Bargaining networks model social or economic situations in which agents seek to form the most lucrative partnership with another agent from among several alternatives. There has been a flurry of recent research studying Nash bargaining solutions (also called 'balanced outcomes') in bargaining networks, so that we now know when such solutions exist, and that they can be computed efficiently, even by market agents behaving in a natural manner. In this work we study a generalization of Nash bargaining, that models the possibility of unequal 'bargaining powers'. This generalization was introduced in [12], where it was shown that the corresponding 'unequal division' (UD) solutions exist if and only if Nash bargaining solutions exist, and also that a certain local dynamics converges to UD solutions when they exist. However, the convergence time for that dynamics was exponential in network size for the unequal division case. Other approaches, such as the one of Kleinberg and Tardos, do not generalize to the unsymmetrical case. Thus, the question of computational tractability of UD solutions has remained open. In this paper, we provide an FPTAS for the computation of UD solutions, when such solutions exist. On a graph G = (V,E) with weights (i.e. pairwise profit opportunities) uniformly bounded above by 1, our FPTAS finds an e-UD solution in time polynomial in the input and 1/e. We also provide a fast local algorithm for finding e-UD solution.

[1]  Tanmoy Chakraborty,et al.  A behavioral study of bargaining in social networks , 2010, EC '10.

[2]  Yuval Peres,et al.  Convergence of Local Dynamics to Balanced Outcomes in Exchange Networks , 2009, 2009 50th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[3]  J. Nash THE BARGAINING PROBLEM , 1950, Classics in Game Theory.

[4]  David Willer Network Exchange Theory , 1999 .

[5]  W. R. Mann,et al.  Mean value methods in iteration , 1953 .

[6]  D. Bertsekas The auction algorithm: A distributed relaxation method for the assignment problem , 1988 .

[7]  U. Kohlenbach A QUANTITATIVE VERSION OF A THEOREM DUE TO BORWEIN-REICH-SHAFRIR , 2001 .

[8]  Yashodhan Kanoria,et al.  Fast convergence of natural bargaining dynamics in exchange networks , 2010, SODA '11.

[9]  S. Ishikawa Fixed points and iteration of a nonexpansive mapping in a Banach space , 1976 .

[10]  Éva Tardos,et al.  Balanced outcomes in social exchange networks , 2008, STOC.

[11]  Bert Huang,et al.  Loopy Belief Propagation for Bipartite Maximum Weight b-Matching , 2007, AISTATS.

[12]  M. Edelstein,et al.  Nonexpansive Mappings, Asymptotic Regularity and Successive Approximations , 1978 .

[13]  Sanjeev Khanna,et al.  Network bargaining: algorithms and structural results , 2009, EC '09.

[14]  David Willer,et al.  Exclusion and Power: a Test of Four Theories of Power in Exchange Networks , 1993 .

[15]  Nicole Immorlica,et al.  The Cooperative Game Theory Foundations of Network Bargaining Games , 2010, ICALP.

[16]  A. Kartsatos Theory and applications of nonlinear operators of accretive and monotone type , 1996 .

[17]  A. Rubinstein Perfect Equilibrium in a Bargaining Model , 1982 .

[18]  Robert E. Tarjan,et al.  Faster scaling algorithms for general graph matching problems , 1991, JACM.

[19]  Karen S. Cook,et al.  Power in exchange networks: a power-dependence formulation , 1992 .

[20]  Sharon C. Rochford,et al.  Symmetrically pairwise-bargained allocations in an assignment market , 1984 .

[21]  Dmitry M. Malioutov,et al.  Linear programming analysis of loopy belief propagation for weighted matching , 2007, NIPS.

[22]  Christos H. Papadimitriou,et al.  On oblivious PTAS's for nash equilibrium , 2009, STOC '09.

[23]  J. Lucas,et al.  Lines of Power in Exchange Networks , 2001 .

[24]  C. Borgs,et al.  On the exactness of the cavity method for weighted b-matchings on arbitrary graphs and its relation to linear programs , 2008, 0807.3159.

[25]  Jeroen Kuipers,et al.  On the computation of the nucleolus of a cooperative game , 2001, Int. J. Game Theory.

[26]  M. Bayati,et al.  Max-Product for Maximum Weight Matching: Convergence, Correctness, and LP Duality , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.