On the Role of AI in the Ongoing Paradigm Shift within the Cognitive Sciences

This paper supports the view that the ongoing shift from orthodox to embodied-embedded cognitive science has been significantly influenced by the experimental results generated by AI research. Recently, there has also been a noticeable shift toward enactivism, a paradigm which radicalizes the embodied-embedded approach by placing autonomous agency and lived subjectivity at the heart of cognitive science. Some first steps toward a clarification of the relationship of AI to this further shift are outlined. It is concluded that the success of enactivism in establishing itself as a mainstream cognitive science research program will depend less on progress made in AI research and more on the development of a phenomenological pragmatics.

[1]  F. Varela,et al.  Radical embodiment: neural dynamics and consciousness , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[2]  Seth Bullock,et al.  Simulation models as opaque thought experiments , 2000 .

[3]  Francisco J. Varela,et al.  Not one, not two , 1976 .

[4]  J. Fodor,et al.  The Language of Thought , 1980 .

[5]  DEREK RICHTER.  Mind as Machine , 1968, Nature.

[6]  E. Thompson.  Mind in Life , 2007 .

[7]  Stevan Harnad,et al.  Symbol grounding problem , 1990, Scholarpedia.

[8]  Tom Ziemke.  What’s life got to do with it? , 2007 .

[9]  R. Beer.  Dynamical approaches to cognitive science , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[10]  H. Jonas.  The phenomenon of life: toward a philosophical biology , 1966 .

[11]  Michael L. Anderson.  Embodied Cognition: A field guide , 2003, Artif. Intell..

[12]  E. Thompson,et al.  Sensorimotor subjectivity and the enactive approach to experience , 2005 .

[13]  Takashi Ikegami,et al.  From a homeostatic to a homeodynamic self , 2008, Biosyst..

[14]  Vincent C. Müller.  Margaret A. Boden, Mind as Machine: A History of Cognitive Science, 2 vols , 2008, Minds and Machines.

[15]  Rolf Pfeifer,et al.  Understanding intelligence , 2020, Inequality by Design.

[16]  E. D. Paolo,et al.  Organismically-inspired robotics: homeostatic adaptation and teleology beyond the closed sensorimotor loop , 2003 .

[17]  Steve Torrance,et al.  In search of the enactive: Introduction to special issue on enactive experience , 2005 .

[18]  Hiroyuki Iizuka,et al.  Toward Spinozist Robotics: Exploring the Minimal Dynamics of Behavioral Preference , 2007, Adapt. Behav..

[19]  Rolf Pfeifer,et al.  Building “Fungus Eaters”: Design Principles of Autonomous Agents , 2007 .

[20]  S. Gallagher.  How the body shapes the mind , 2005 .

[21]  T. Gelder,et al.  The dynamical hypothesis in cognitive science , 1998, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[22]  Stanley J. Rosenschein,et al.  A dynamical systems perspective on agent-environment interaction , 1996 .

[23]  F. Varela,et al.  First-person methodologies: What, why, how? , 1999 .

[24]  Alva Noë,et al.  Action in Perception , 2006, Representation and Mind.

[25]  Marina Basu.  The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience , 2004 .

[26]  Allen Newell,et al.  Computer science as empirical inquiry: symbols and search , 1976, CACM.

[27]  J. Levine.  MATERIALISM AND QUALIA: THE EXPLANATORY GAP , 1983 .

[28]  Rodney A. Brooks,et al.  From earwigs to humans , 1997, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[29]  Donald Michie,et al.  Machine Intelligence 4 , 1970 .

[30]  J. Pollack,et al.  Homeostasis and Rein Control: From Daisyworld to Active Perception , 2004 .

[31]  H. Maturana,et al.  Autopoiesis and Cognition , 1980 .

[32]  Inman Harvey,et al.  Evolutionary Robotics: A New Scientific Tool for Studying Cognition , 2005, Artificial Life.

[33]  Hubert L. Dreyfus,et al.  Making a Mind Versus Modelling the Brain: Artificial Intelligence Back at the Branchpoint , 1991 .

[34]  John McCarthy,et al.  SOME PHILOSOPHICAL PROBLEMS FROM THE STANDPOINT OF ARTI CIAL INTELLIGENCE , 1987 .

[35]  H. Maturana,et al.  Autopoiesis and Cognition : The Realization of the Living (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Scie , 1980 .

[36]  R. A. Brooks,et al.  Intelligence without Representation , 1991, Artif. Intell..

[37]  Allen Newell,et al.  Computer science as empirical inquiry: symbols and search (1976) , 1989 .

[38]  Philipp Slusallek,et al.  Introduction to real-time ray tracing , 2005, SIGGRAPH Courses.

[39]  Tom Froese,et al.  Autonomy: A Review and a Reappraisal , 2007, ECAL.

[40]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Psychological and biological models , 1986 .

[41]  Andy Clark,et al.  Visual Awareness and Visuomotor Action , 1999 .

[42]  Evan Thompson,et al.  The Mind-Body-Body Problem , 2007 .

[43]  M. Boden,et al.  Mind As Machine: A History of Cognitive Science Two-Volume Set , 2006 .

[44]  F. Varela,et al.  Life after Kant: Natural purposes and the autopoietic foundations of biological individuality , 2002 .

[45]  H. Dreyfus.  Why Heideggerian AI Failed and How Fixing it Would Require Making it More Heideggerian , 2007 .