Null Point Imaging: A Joint Acquisition/Analysis Paradigm for MR Classification

Automatic classification of neurological tissues is a first step to many structural analysis pipelines. Most computational approaches are designed to extract the best possible classification results out of MR data acquired with standard clinical protocols. We observe that the characteristics of the latter owe more to the historical circumstances under which they were developed and the visual appreciation of the radiographer who acquires the images than to the optimality with which they can be classified with an automatic algorithm. We submit that better performances could be obtained by considering the acquisition and analysis processes conjointly rather than optimising them independently. Here, we propose such a joint approach to MR tissue classification in the form of a fast MR sequence, which nulls the magnitude and changes the sign of the phase at the boundary between tissue types. A simple phase-based thresholding algorithm then suffices to segment the tissues. Preliminary results show promises to simplify and shorten the overall classification process.

[1]  Jerry L Prince,et al.  Current methods in medical image segmentation. , 2000, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[2]  Wei Xu,et al.  A region-growing algorithm for InSAR phase unwrapping , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[3]  William M. Wells,et al.  Simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE): an algorithm for the validation of image segmentation , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  W. Nitz,et al.  MP RAGE: a three-dimensional, T1-weighted, gradient-echo sequence--initial experience in the brain. , 1992, Radiology.

[5]  Ahmet Burak Can,et al.  Automatic segmentation of white matter lesions , 2009, 2009 IEEE 17th Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference.

[6]  Wiro J. Niessen,et al.  Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2001 , 2001, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[7]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Voxel-Based Morphometry—The Methods , 2000, NeuroImage.

[8]  Philippe Robert,et al.  Classification of SPECT Images of Normal Subjects versus Images of Alzheimer's Disease Patients , 2001, MICCAI.

[9]  Koenraad Van Leemput,et al.  Automated model-based tissue classification of MR images of the brain , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  L. R. Dice Measures of the Amount of Ecologic Association Between Species , 1945 .

[11]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Brain Mapping: The Methods , 2002 .

[12]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Segmentation of brain MR images through a hidden Markov random field model and the expectation-maximization algorithm , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[13]  Simon K. Warfield,et al.  Fast k-NN classification for multichannel image data , 1996, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[14]  A M Dale,et al.  Measuring the thickness of the human cerebral cortex from magnetic resonance images. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  Ron Kikinis,et al.  Markov random field segmentation of brain MR images , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[16]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  ANIMAL+INSECT: Improved Cortical Structure Segmentation , 1999, IPMI.

[17]  Yu-Chung N. Cheng,et al.  Susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI) , 2004, Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik.

[18]  Kiralee M. Hayashi,et al.  Dynamics of Gray Matter Loss in Alzheimer's Disease , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Design and construction of a realistic digital brain phantom , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.