Input permutation method to detect active voxels in fMRI study.

Correctly identifying voxels or regions of interest (ROI) that actively respond to a given stimulus is often an important objective/step in many functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies. In this article, we study a nonparametric method to detect active voxels, which makes minimal assumption about the distribution of blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) signals. Our proposal has several interesting features. It uses time lagged correlation to take into account the delay in response to the stimulus, due to hemodynamic variations. We introduce an input permutation method (IPM), a type of block permutation method, to approximate the null distribution of the test statistic. Also, we propose to pool the permutation-derived statistics of preselected voxels for a better approximation to the null distribution. Finally, we control multiple testing error rate using the local false discovery rate (FDR) by Efron [Correlation and large-scale simultaneous hypothesis testing. J Am Stat Assoc 102 (2007) 93-103] and Park et al. [Estimation of empirical null using a mixture of normals and its use in local false discovery rate. Comput Stat Data Anal 55 (2011) 2421-2432] to select the active voxels.

[1]  Kristina M. Ropella,et al.  Estimation of FMRI response delays☆ ☆ Grant sponsor: The Whitaker Foundation Special Opportunity Award Program, the Jobling Foundation, the Anthony J. and Rose Eannelli Bagozzi Medical Research Fellowship. NIH; Grants EY10244, MH51358, GCRC 5M01RR00058. , 2003, NeuroImage.

[2]  J. -B. Poline,et al.  Estimating the Delay of the fMRI Response , 2002, NeuroImage.

[3]  Carl-Fredrik Westin,et al.  Resampling fMRI time series , 2005, NeuroImage.

[4]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[5]  Junyong Park,et al.  Estimation of empirical null using a mixture of normals and its use in local false discovery rate , 2011, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[6]  R. Turner,et al.  Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  A General Statistical Analysis for fMRI Data , 2000, NeuroImage.

[8]  Gary A. Churchill,et al.  Estimating p-values in small microarray experiments , 2007, Bioinform..

[9]  B. Efron Large-Scale Simultaneous Hypothesis Testing , 2004 .

[10]  T A Carpenter,et al.  Colored noise and computational inference in neurophysiological (fMRI) time series analysis: Resampling methods in time and wavelet domains , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[11]  Scott A. Huettel,et al.  Regional Differences in the Refractory Period of the Hemodynamic Response: An Event-Related fMRI Study , 2001, NeuroImage.

[12]  Joseph P. Romano On the behaviour of randomization tests without the group invariance assumption , 1990 .

[13]  B. Rosen,et al.  Functional mapping of the human visual cortex by magnetic resonance imaging. , 1991, Science.

[14]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of fMRI Time-Series Revisited , 1995, NeuroImage.

[15]  R. S. Hinks,et al.  Time course EPI of human brain function during task activation , 1992, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  Jonathan E. Taylor,et al.  Empirical null and false discovery rate analysis in neuroimaging , 2009, NeuroImage.

[17]  Nava Rubin,et al.  Cluster-based analysis of FMRI data , 2006, NeuroImage.

[18]  G. Glover Deconvolution of Impulse Response in Event-Related BOLD fMRI1 , 1999, NeuroImage.

[19]  Adrian T. Lee,et al.  Discrimination of Large Venous Vessels in Time‐Course Spiral Blood‐Oxygen‐Level‐Dependent Magnetic‐Resonance Functional Neuroimaging , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  R W Cox,et al.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[21]  Arvind P Pathak,et al.  Decoupling of the Hemodynamic and Activation-induced Delays in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2003, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[22]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Intrinsic signal changes accompanying sensory stimulation: functional brain mapping with magnetic resonance imaging. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  Yifan Huang,et al.  To permute or not to permute , 2006, Bioinform..

[24]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Mental chronometry using latency-resolved functional MRI. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: A primer with examples , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[26]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Statistical methods of estimation and inference for functional MR image analysis , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[27]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A unified statistical approach for determining significant signals in images of cerebral activation , 1996, Human brain mapping.

[28]  J D Watson,et al.  Nonparametric Analysis of Statistic Images from Functional Mapping Experiments , 1996, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.