Creative Chunking: Modularity Increases Prototyping Quantity, Creative Self-Efficacy and Cognitive Flow
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Steven D. Eppinger,et al. Integration analysis of product decompositions , 1994 .
[2] Scott R. Klemmer,et al. d . tools : Integrated Prototyping for Physical Interaction Design , 2005 .
[3] A. Bandura. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychological review.
[4] S. Engeser,et al. Flow, performance and moderators of challenge-skill balance , 2008 .
[5] P. Tierney,et al. Creative Self-Efficacy: Its Potential Antecedents and Relationship to Creative Performance , 2002 .
[6] A. Bandera. Self-Efficacy toward a unifying of behavior change , 1977 .
[7] R. Marsh,et al. How examples may (and may not) constrain creativity , 1996, Memory & cognition.
[8] Kim B. Clark,et al. The Option Value of Modularity in Design: An Example From Design Rules, Volume 1: The Power of Modularity , 2000 .
[9] Daniel L. Schwartz,et al. Parallel prototyping leads to better design results, more divergence, and increased self-efficacy , 2010, TCHI.
[10] Scott R. Klemmer,et al. Early and Repeated Exposure to Examples Improves Creative Work , 2012, CogSci.
[11] G. A. Miller. THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .
[12] M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al. Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness. , 1988 .
[13] Kim B. Clark,et al. Design Rules: The Power of Modularity Volume 1 , 1999 .