A Study on Robust SEM Photometric Stereo Using Two BSE Detectors

This thesis presents a novel robust SEM photometric stereo method using two backscattered electron detectors. Robustness is one of the most important factors for practical applications. Although SEM photometric stereo has gained a lot of attention and been extensively studied, the robustness remains a very interesting challenge. Among ill factors, we realize that shadowing and noise problems are almost inherent in SEM photometric stereo. In particular, the shadowing effects generally give rise to significant errors in the reconstructed shapes. The present work is thereby devoted to developing SEM photometric stereo so that it can automatically handle such ill factors. For dealing with shadowing effects, we introduce a shadowing compensation model though modeling image intensities in both cases of absence and presence of shadowing based mainly on angle distribution of backscattered electrons. This model relates the underlying shadowless image to the observed one by the corresponding detection ratio. The detection ratio has modeled the shadowing generation process by means of shadowing angles, which reflects the amount of occluded backscattered electrons. One advantage of the shadowing compensation model is that it is no need for us to treat the regions with shadowing errors separately from those without such errors, because the shadowless case is the special case of shadowing. Therefore, in contrast to some other approaches, the proposed method does not require an image segmentation process to extract shadowing regions, which is substantially difficult to implement automatically. The model has already provided an important cue to eliminate shadowing errors by means of inferring the shadowless images from the observed one if the shadowing angles can be obtained. With the shadowing compensation model and gradient estimation equation, we formulate the proposed robust shape reconstruction into a constrained optimization problem via a variational approach. The objective functional consists of two terms. One is the fidelity term that is to guarantee the gradient of reconstructed shape should be consistent with the gradient data. In particular, the gradient data are evaluated from shadowless images so as to eliminate shadowing errors. In addition, shadowless images are related to the corresponding observed ones through our shadowing compensation ∗Doctoral Thesis, Division of Systems Science and Informatics, Graduate School of Information Science and Technology, Hokkaido University, SSI-DT79115040, March 25, 2014.

[1]  Jean-Michel Morel,et al.  Variational methods in image segmentation , 1995 .

[2]  Tomaso Poggio,et al.  Computational vision and regularization theory , 1985, Nature.

[3]  Rachid Deriche,et al.  Computing Optical Flow via Variational Techniques , 1999, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[4]  T. Chan,et al.  On the Convergence of the Lagged Diffusivity Fixed Point Method in Total Variation Image Restoration , 1999 .

[5]  Lauwerens Kuipers,et al.  Handbook of Mathematics , 2014 .

[6]  N. K. Myshkin,et al.  Reconstruction of true topographies of solid surfaces in scanning electron microscopes using secondary electron , 1987 .

[7]  Maria Petrou,et al.  The 4-Source Photometric Stereo Technique for Three-Dimensional Surfaces in the Presence of Highlights and Shadows , 2003, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[8]  I. Carlsen Reconstruction of true surface-topographies in scanning electron microscopes using backscattered electrons , 1985 .

[9]  Johnny T. Chang,et al.  Shadow Graphs and 3D Texture Reconstruction , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[10]  Massimo Fornasier,et al.  Theoretical Foundations and Numerical Methods for Sparse Recovery , 2010, Radon Series on Computational and Applied Mathematics.

[11]  A. Chambolle,et al.  A convex relaxation approach for computing minimal partitions , 2009, 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[12]  Yizhou Yu,et al.  Shadow Graphs and Surface Reconstruction , 2002, ECCV.

[13]  William L. Briggs,et al.  A multigrid tutorial , 1987 .

[14]  David J. Kriegman,et al.  ShadowCuts: Photometric Stereo with Shadows , 2007, 2007 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[15]  Katsushi Ikeuchi,et al.  Numerical Shape from Shading and Occluding Boundaries , 1981, Artif. Intell..

[16]  Robert J. Woodham,et al.  Photometric method for determining surface orientation from multiple images , 1980 .

[17]  Debbie J. Stokes,et al.  A New Approach to Studying Biological and Soft Materials Using Focused Ion Beam Scanning Electron Microscopy (FIB SEM) , 2006 .

[18]  M. Hemmleb,et al.  Determination of the height of a microstructure sample by a SEM with a conventional and a digital photogrammetric method , 1996 .

[19]  Roberto Cipolla,et al.  Shadows in Three-Source Photometric Stereo , 2008, ECCV.

[20]  J. Storl,et al.  Digital stereophotogrammetry for processing SEM Data , 1987 .

[21]  Pierre Kornprobst,et al.  Mathematical problems in image processing - partial differential equations and the calculus of variations , 2010, Applied mathematical sciences.

[22]  Timo Kohlberger,et al.  A Multigrid Platform for Real-Time Motion Computation with Discontinuity-Preserving Variational Methods , 2006, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[23]  L. Reimer Scanning Electron Microscopy: Physics of Image Formation and Microanalysis , 1984 .

[24]  Katsuhiko Sakaue,et al.  Optimization Approaches in Computer Vision and Image Processing , 1999 .

[25]  Curtis R. Vogel,et al.  Iterative Methods for Total Variation Denoising , 1996, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[26]  J. Lebiedzik An automatic topographical surface reconstruction in the SEM , 1979 .

[27]  M. Ramsey,et al.  Micron-scale roughness of volcanic surfaces from thermal infrared spectroscopy and scanning electron microscopy , 2009 .

[28]  Berthold K. P. Horn Height and gradient from shading , 1989, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[29]  Rama Chellappa,et al.  What Is the Range of Surface Reconstructions from a Gradient Field? , 2006, ECCV.

[30]  Louis A. Hageman,et al.  Iterative Solution of Large Linear Systems. , 1971 .

[31]  Tony F. Chan,et al.  Image processing and analysis - variational, PDE, wavelet, and stochastic methods , 2005 .

[32]  Tony F. Chan,et al.  Total variation blind deconvolution , 1998, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[33]  Maki Tanaka,et al.  New technique to reconstruct effective 3D profile from tilt images of CD-SEM , 2004, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[34]  Aly A. Farag,et al.  Shape from Shading Under Various Imaging Conditions , 2007, 2007 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[35]  W. Slówko,et al.  Surface reconstruction with the photometric method in SEM , 2005 .

[36]  Kenji Watanabe,et al.  Efficient killer-defect control using reliable high-throughput SEM-ADC , 2001, 2001 IEEE/SEMI Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference (IEEE Cat. No.01CH37160).

[37]  Shun'ichi Kaneko,et al.  Robust Surface Reconstruction in SEM Using Two BSE Detectors , 2013, IEICE Trans. Inf. Syst..

[38]  Jean Ponce,et al.  Computer Vision: A Modern Approach , 2002 .

[39]  Tadao Suganuma Measurement of Surface Topography Using SEM with Two Secondary Electron Detectors , 1985 .

[40]  Ping-Sing Tsai,et al.  Shape from Shading: A Survey , 1999, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[41]  Michael J. Brooks,et al.  The variational approach to shape from shading , 1986, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[42]  M. Nikolova An Algorithm for Total Variation Minimization and Applications , 2004 .

[43]  Thomas Marschner,et al.  Characterization of 193-nm resist layers by CD-SEM sidewall imaging , 2003, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[44]  Ariel Ben-Porath,et al.  SEM-based ADC evaluation and integration in an advanced process fab , 2000, Advanced Lithography.