The Separate Neural Control of Hand Movements and Contact Forces

To manipulate an object, we must simultaneously control the contact forces exerted on the object and the movements of our hand. Two alternative views for manipulation have been proposed: one in which motions and contact forces are represented and controlled by separate neural processes, and one in which motions and forces are controlled jointly, by a single process. To evaluate these alternatives, we designed three tasks in which subjects maintained a specified contact force while their hand was moved by a robotic manipulandum. The prescribed contact force and hand motions were selected in each task to induce the subject to attain one of three goals: (1) exerting a regulated contact force, (2) tracking the motion of the manipulandum, and (3) attaining both force and motion goals concurrently. By comparing subjects' performances in these three tasks, we found that behavior was captured by the summed actions of two independent control systems: one applying the desired force, and the other guiding the hand along the predicted path of the manipulandum. Furthermore, the application of transcranial magnetic stimulation impulses to the posterior parietal cortex selectively disrupted the control of motion but did not affect the regulation of static contact force. Together, these findings are consistent with the view that manipulation of objects is performed by independent brain control of hand motions and interaction forces.

[1]  John J. Craig,et al.  Hybrid position/force control of manipulators , 1981 .

[2]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Posture control and trajectory formation during arm movement , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[3]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Impedance Control: An Approach to Manipulation , 1984, 1984 American Control Conference.

[4]  N. Hogan,et al.  Impedance Control:An Approach to Manipulation,Parts I,II,III , 1985 .

[5]  T. Flash,et al.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[6]  Matthew T. Mason,et al.  Mechanics and Planning of Manipulator Pushing Operations , 1986 .

[7]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Adaptive Mixtures of Local Experts , 1991, Neural Computation.

[8]  N. Hogan,et al.  Does the nervous system use equilibrium-point control to guide single and multiple joint movements? , 1992, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[9]  F. A. Mussa-lvaldi,et al.  Convergent force fields organized in the frog's spinal cord , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[10]  Robert A. Jacobs,et al.  Hierarchical Mixtures of Experts and the EM Algorithm , 1993, Neural Computation.

[11]  P. Rossini,et al.  Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application. Report of an IFCN committee. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[12]  M I Lipshits,et al.  Measurements of human force control during a constrained arm motion using a force-actuated joystick. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  Zoubin Ghahramani,et al.  Modular decomposition in visuomotor learning , 1997, Nature.

[14]  J G Semmler,et al.  Hemispheric differences in motor cortex excitability during a simple index finger abduction task in humans. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  J McIntyre,et al.  Reference frames and internal models for visuo-manual coordination: what can we learn from microgravity experiments? , 1998, Brain Research Reviews.

[16]  D M Wolpert,et al.  Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control , 1998, Neural Networks.

[17]  J R Flanagan,et al.  Composition and Decomposition of Internal Models in Motor Learning under Altered Kinematic and Dynamic Environments , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Role of the posterior parietal cortex in updating reaching movements to a visual target , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[19]  Martin J Watson MSc Mcsp Neurophysiological Basis of Movement , 1999 .

[20]  Matthew F. S. Rushworth,et al.  Attention systems and the organization of the human parietal cortex , 2001, NeuroImage.

[21]  M. Rushworth,et al.  Attention Systems and the Organization of the Human Parietal Cortex , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  R. Andersen,et al.  Intentional maps in posterior parietal cortex. , 2002, Annual review of neuroscience.

[23]  Penny A. MacDonald,et al.  The role of parietal cortex in awareness of self-generated movements: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[24]  M. Kawato,et al.  Modular organization of internal models of tools in the human cerebellum , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Philippe A. Chouinard,et al.  Modulating neural networks with transcranial magnetic stimulation applied over the dorsal premotor and primary motor cortices. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  D. Ostry,et al.  Stimulation of the Posterior Parietal Cortex Interferes with Arm Trajectory Adjustments during the Learning of New Dynamics , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  M. Spong,et al.  Robot Modeling and Control , 2005 .

[28]  S. Scott,et al.  Random change in cortical load representation suggests distinct control of posture and movement , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[29]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Virtual lesions of the anterior intraparietal area disrupt goal-dependent on-line adjustments of grasp , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[30]  R. Andersen,et al.  The posterior parietal cortex: Sensorimotor interface for the planning and online control of visually guided movements , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[31]  John F Kalaska,et al.  Parietal area 5 activity does not reflect the differential time-course of motor output kinetics during arm-reaching and isometric-force tasks. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  Benjamin K. Barry,et al.  Reflex responsiveness of a human hand muscle when controlling isometric force and joint position , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.