Computationally efficient approach for identification of fuzzy dynamic groundwater sampling network

In the present work, uncertainty-based dynamic sampling frameworks were tested for a sampling horizon with multiple time steps. Future concentration values were assumed as fuzzy numbers. Multiple realization–based simulations were used for generation of fuzzy numbers. The first framework considers fuzzy variance reduction. The second framework considers mass estimation error reduction with maximization of spatial coverage of the dynamic sampling network. It is a multi-objective optimization problem with a large number of objectives. In Dhar and Patil (2012), uncertainty-based optimal sampling design model was suggested using Nondominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm-II (NSGA-II) as its optimization algorithm. However, NSGA-II becomes computationally expensive while handling more than three objectives. We extend the previously suggested algorithm for multi-objective sampling network design problems based on NSGA-III framework. Two design frameworks were proposed: one incorporating a simulation model and a fuzzy covariance for minimizing the total contaminant-concentration variance and the other incorporating a simulation model and a fuzzy kriging model in conjunction with an optimization model to minimize the fuzzy mass estimation error and spatial coverage of spatiotemporal sampling locations. NSGA-III was used for solving the sampling network design model. Performances of the proposed frameworks were evaluated for two hypothetical illustrative examples. The results indicate that the proposed design frameworks perform satisfactorily under uncertain system conditions.

[1]  Bithin Datta,et al.  Uncertainty based optimal monitoring network design for a chlorinated hydrocarbon contaminated site , 2011, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[2]  Ayse Muhammetoglu,et al.  A Fuzzy Logic Approach to Assess Groundwater Pollution Levels Below Agricultural Fields , 2006, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[3]  Arlen W. Harbaugh,et al.  MODFLOW-2000, The U.S. Geological Survey Modular Ground-Water Model - User Guide to Modularization Concepts and the Ground-Water Flow Process , 2000 .

[4]  Liangjian Hu,et al.  The variance and covariance of fuzzy random variables and their applications , 2001, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[5]  Bithin Datta,et al.  Dynamic Optimal Monitoring Network Design for Transient Transport of Pollutants in Groundwater Aquifers , 2008 .

[6]  P. Diamond Fuzzy kriging , 1989 .

[7]  Paul P. Wang,et al.  MT3DMS: A Modular Three-Dimensional Multispecies Transport Model for Simulation of Advection, Dispersion, and Chemical Reactions of Contaminants in Groundwater Systems; Documentation and User's Guide , 1999 .

[8]  Bithin Datta,et al.  Multiobjective Design of Dynamic Monitoring Networks for Detection of Groundwater Pollution , 2007 .

[9]  Om Prakash,et al.  Sequential optimal monitoring network design and iterative spatial estimation of pollutant concentration for identification of unknown groundwater pollution source locations , 2013, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment.

[10]  B. Hobbs,et al.  Review of Ground‐Water Quality Monitoring Network Design , 1993 .

[11]  Anirban Dhar,et al.  Multiobjective Design of Groundwater Monitoring Network Under Epistemic Uncertainty , 2012, Water Resources Management.

[12]  Patrick M. Reed,et al.  Many‐objective groundwater monitoring network design using bias‐aware ensemble Kalman filtering, evolutionary optimization, and visual analytics , 2011 .

[13]  D. Singh,et al.  Optimal groundwater monitoring network design for pollution plume estimation with active sources , 2014 .

[14]  Bithin Datta,et al.  Logic-Based Design of Groundwater Monitoring Network for Redundancy Reduction , 2010 .

[15]  R. Ababou,et al.  Three-dimensional flow in random porous media , 1988 .

[16]  Miguel A. Mariño,et al.  Rule-Based Fuzzy System for Assessing Groundwater Vulnerability , 2007 .

[17]  George F. Pinder,et al.  Space‐time optimization of groundwater quality sampling networks , 2005 .

[18]  Om Prakash,et al.  OPTIMAL MONITORING NETWORK DESIGN FOR EFFICIENT IDENTIFICATION OF UNKNOWN GROUNDWATER POLLUTION SOURCES , 2014 .

[19]  Clayton V. Deutsch,et al.  GSLIB: Geostatistical Software Library and User's Guide , 1993 .

[20]  Patrick M. Reed,et al.  Striking the Balance: Long-Term Groundwater Monitoring Design for Conflicting Objectives , 2004 .

[21]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  An Evolutionary Many-Objective Optimization Algorithm Using Reference-Point-Based Nondominated Sorting Approach, Part I: Solving Problems With Box Constraints , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[22]  Arlen W. Harbaugh,et al.  A modular three-dimensional finite-difference ground-water flow model , 1984 .

[23]  Joseph R. Kasprzyk,et al.  A new epsilon-dominance hierarchical Bayesian optimization algorithm for large multiobjective monitoring network design problems , 2008 .

[24]  Bithin Datta,et al.  Global Optimal Design of Ground Water Monitoring Network Using Embedded Kriging , 2009, Ground water.

[25]  Bithin Datta,et al.  Multiobjective Monitoring Network Design for Efficient Identification of Unknown Groundwater Pollution Sources Incorporating Genetic Programming-Based Monitoring , 2014 .