Augmenting cognitive processes in robot-assisted motor rehabilitation

Cognitive processes, such as motor intention, attention, and higher level motivational states are important factors that govern motor performance and learning. Current robot-assisted rehabilitative programs focus only on the physical aspects of training. In this paper, we propose a framework for motor rehabilitation based on the augmentation of cognitive channels of patient-robot interactions and using it to deliver a more optimal therapy. By examining the cognitive processes involved in motor control and adaptation, it is argued that optimal therapy needs to be considered in the context of a complete motor scheme consisting not only of sensorimotor signals, but also their interactions with cognitive operations, such as motor planning, attention, and motivation, which mediate motor learning. We outline a few BCI-based modules for the detection and monitoring of relevant cognitive processes, which provide inputs for the robot to automatically modulate parameters of the rehabilitation protocol. Preliminary investigations on a BCI module for detection of motor intention, performed on a small group of stroke patients, show feasible accuracies.

[1]  M. Clark,et al.  Abnormal illness behaviour in rehabilitation from stroke , 1997, Clinical rehabilitation.

[2]  Kurt A. Thoroughman,et al.  Divided attention impairs human motor adaptation but not feedback control. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  N. Hogan,et al.  Robot-aided neurorehabilitation. , 1998, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[4]  C. Wolfe,et al.  The Concept of Patient Motivation: A Qualitative Analysis of Stroke Professionals’ Attitudes , 2002, Stroke.

[5]  Aaas News,et al.  Book Reviews , 1893, Buffalo Medical and Surgical Journal.

[6]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  Selective visual-spatial attention alters induced gamma band responses in the human EEG , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[7]  Maja J Matarić,et al.  Socially Assistive Robotics for Post-stroke Rehabilitation Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation Socially Assistive Robotics for Post-stroke Rehabilitation , 2007 .

[8]  Mitsuo Kawato,et al.  Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning , 1999, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[9]  S. Starkstein,et al.  POST-STROKE DEPRESSION AND RECOVERY AFTER STROKE , 1987, The Lancet.

[10]  P ? ? ? ? ? ? ? % ? ? ? ? , 1991 .

[11]  I. Robertson,et al.  Motor recovery after stroke depends on intact sustained attention: a 2-year follow-up study. , 1997, Neuropsychology.

[12]  Amy J Bastian,et al.  Cerebellar damage impairs automaticity of a recently practiced movement. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  Rieko Osu,et al.  The central nervous system stabilizes unstable dynamics by learning optimal impedance , 2001, Nature.

[14]  C.G. Burgar,et al.  Evidence for improved muscle activation patterns after retraining of reaching movements with the MIME robotic system in subjects with post-stroke hemiparesis , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[15]  N B Lincoln,et al.  Effect of severity of arm impairment on response to additional physiotherapy early after stroke , 1999, Clinical rehabilitation.

[16]  Gert Pfurtscheller,et al.  Motor imagery and direct brain-computer communication , 2001, Proc. IEEE.

[17]  F A Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[18]  Jeanine Blanc-garin Patterns of recovery from hemiplegia following stroke , 1994 .

[19]  Cuntai Guan,et al.  Filter Bank Common Spatial Pattern (FBCSP) in Brain-Computer Interface , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence).

[20]  M. Jeannerod Mental imagery in the motor context , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  R. Miall,et al.  The role of proprioception and attention in a visuomotor adaptation task , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  Zoubin Ghahramani,et al.  Computational principles of movement neuroscience , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[23]  T. Elbert,et al.  New treatments in neurorehabiliation founded on basic research , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[24]  R. Nudo,et al.  Effects of Repetitive Motor Training on Movement Representations in Adult Squirrel Monkeys: Role of Use versus Learning , 2000, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[25]  S. Schaal The Computational Neurobiology of Reaching and Pointing — A Foundation for Motor Learning by Reza Shadmehr and Steven P. Wise , 2007 .

[26]  D. Landers,et al.  The effects of mental practice on motor skill learning and performance: A meta-analysis. , 1983 .

[27]  Anthony J. Ries,et al.  Automatic Versus Contingent Mechanisms of Sensory-Driven Neural Biasing and Reflexive Attention , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[28]  S. Bentin,et al.  Different Effects of Voluntary and Involuntary Attention on EEG Activity in the Gamma Band , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  P. Dario,et al.  Design strategies to improve patient motivation during robot-aided rehabilitation , 2007, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[30]  T. Wyller,et al.  Prevalence of stroke and stroke-related disability. , 1998, Stroke.

[31]  Cuntai Guan,et al.  Multiclass voluntary facial expression classification based on Filter Bank Common Spatial Pattern , 2008, 2008 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[32]  R. Nudo,et al.  Neural Substrates for the Effects of Rehabilitative Training on Motor Recovery After Ischemic Infarct , 1996, Science.

[33]  Christian Laugier,et al.  Controlling a Wheelchair Indoors Using Thought , 2007, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[34]  A Tupper,et al.  Predictive factors in stroke outcome and implications for intervention , 1987, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[35]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Mapping motor representations with positron emission tomography , 1994, Nature.

[36]  Iven M. Y. Mareels,et al.  Stability and motor adaptation in human arm movements , 2005, Biological Cybernetics.

[37]  K.P. Tee,et al.  How are internal models of unstable tasks formed? , 2004, The 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[38]  G. Wulf,et al.  Increased movement accuracy and reduced EMG activity as the result of adopting an external focus of attention , 2005, Brain Research Bulletin.

[39]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  The functional anatomy of motor recovery after stroke in humans: A study with positron emission tomography , 1991, Annals of neurology.

[40]  N. Hogan,et al.  Effects of robotic therapy on motor impairment and recovery in chronic stroke. , 2003, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[41]  G. M. Redding,et al.  Cognitive Load and Prism Adaptation. , 1992, Journal of motor behavior.

[42]  G. Lankhorst,et al.  Post-stroke depression and functional outcome: a cohort study investigating the influence of depression on functional recovery from stroke , 1999, Clinical rehabilitation.

[43]  J. Sanes,et al.  Combined visual attention and finger movement effects on human brain representations , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[44]  N. Solomon,et al.  Prevalence of stroke and stroke-related disability. Estimates from the Auckland stroke studies. , 1997, Stroke.