Perception of BCI assistive technology by post-ischemic stroke patients

Stroke is the leading cause of acquired physical impairment in adult in the world. One person in six seconds is having a stroke somewhere in the world. It is estimated that one-third of stroke victims will be handicapped, and will require assistive technology of some sort. There are many BCI therapeutic resources in development that can be used for treating patients who have any physical challenge. The objective of this study is to explore the perception of BCI assistive technology by the post-stroke patients that have sequelae. We applied a home developed questionnaire and conducted a semi-structured interview by phone to explore the perception of patients towards BCI procedures. We studied seven post-ischemic stroke patients (4 men) with a mean age of 63 years (range 34-80 years). Six subjects had incomplete basic education and only one subject had completed high school. The median Rankin score was 3 (range 2-4). We found positive to very positive perception on the usage of BCI. A pleasant experience was described by all patients and no complaints were reported. Most subjects misinterpreted the research procedures regarding them as part of their treatment. In conclusion, the overall perception of BCI by the stroke patients was positive, and there is a willingness of trying this type of technology in particular when physicians are part of the BCI implementation process.

[1]  Teodiano Freire Bastos Filho,et al.  Robotic wheelchair commanded by SSVEP, motor imagery and word generation , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[2]  Christian Laugier,et al.  Controlling a Wheelchair Indoors Using Thought , 2007, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[3]  H. Flor,et al.  A spelling device for the paralysed , 1999, Nature.

[4]  Ethan R. Buch,et al.  Think to Move: a Neuromagnetic Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) System for Chronic Stroke , 2008, Stroke.

[5]  S. Coyle,et al.  Brain–computer interfaces: a review , 2003 .

[6]  M. Grosse-Wentrup,et al.  Towards brain-robot interfaces in stroke rehabilitation , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[7]  Miguel A. L. Nicolelis,et al.  Brain–machine interfaces: past, present and future , 2006, Trends in Neurosciences.

[8]  Jonathan R Wolpaw,et al.  Brain–computer interfaces as new brain output pathways , 2007, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  J. L. Contreras-Vidal,et al.  Restoration of Whole Body Movement: Toward a Noninvasive Brain-Machine Interface System , 2012, IEEE Pulse.

[10]  Dennis J. McFarland,et al.  Brain-Computer Interface Operation of Robotic and Prosthetic Devices , 2008, Computer.

[11]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Prosthetic Control by an EEG-based Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) , 2001 .

[12]  George A. Mensah,et al.  The atlas of heart disease and stroke , 2005 .

[13]  Y. Li,et al.  An Effective BCI Speller Based on Semi-supervised Learning , 2006, 2006 International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[14]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Brain-Computer Interfaces for Communication and Control. , 2011, Communications of the ACM.

[15]  S. Acharya,et al.  Toward Electrocorticographic Control of a Dexterous Upper Limb Prosthesis: Building Brain-Machine Interfaces , 2012, IEEE Pulse.