Local velocity representation: evidence from motion adaptation

Adaptation to a moving visual pattern induces shifts in the perceived motion of subsequently viewed moving patterns. Explanations of such effects are typically based on adaptation-induced sensitivity changes in spatio-temporal frequency tuned mechanisms (STFMs). An alternative hypothesis is that adaptation occurs in mechanisms that independently encode direction and speed (DSMs). Yet a third possibility is that adaptation occurs in mechanisms that encode 2D pattern velocity (VMs). We performed a series of psychophysical experiments to examine predictions made by each of the three hypotheses. The results indicate that: (1) adaptation-induced shifts are relatively independent of spatial pattern of both adapting and test stimuli; (2) the shift in perceived direction of motion of a plaid stimulus after adaptation to a grating indicates a shift in the motion of the plaid pattern, and not a shift in the motion of the plaid components; and (3) the 2D pattern of shift in perceived velocity radiates away from the adaptation velocity, and is inseparable in speed and direction of motion. Taken together, these results are most consistent with the VM adaptation hypothesis.

[1]  A. T. Smith.  Velocity perception and discrimination: Relation to temporal mechanisms , 1987, Vision Research.

[2]  R Blake,et al.  Another perspective on the visual motion aftereffect. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  D J Heeger,et al.  Model for the extraction of image flow. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[4]  Peter Thompson,et al.  Velocity after-effects: The effects of adaptation to moving stimuli on the perception of subsequently seen moving stimuli , 1981, Vision Research.

[5]  S. Nishida,et al.  Motion aftereffect with flickering test patterns reveals higher stages of motion processing , 1995, Vision Research.

[6]  Anthony J. Movshon,et al.  Visual Response Properties of Striate Cortical Neurons Projecting to Area MT in Macaque Monkeys , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  P. McLeod,et al.  Are direction and speed coded independently by the visual system? Evidence from visual search. , 1992, Spatial vision.

[8]  N J Wade,et al.  A Selective History of the Study of Visual Motion Aftereffects , 1994, Perception.

[9]  R. Snowden.  Adaptability of the visual system is inversely related to its sensitivity. , 1994, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[10]  C. Baker,et al.  Spatial frequency selective mechanisms underlying the motion aftereffect , 1992, Vision Research.

[11]  A. T. Smith,et al.  Antagonistic comparison of temporal frequency filter outputs as a basis for speed perception , 1994, Vision Research.

[12]  T. Albright.  Direction and orientation selectivity of neurons in visual area MT of the macaque. , 1984, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  Colin Blakemore,et al.  Vision: Coding and Efficiency , 1991 .

[14]  A. T. Smith,et al.  Velocity coding: Evidence from perceived velocity shifts , 1985, Vision Research.

[15]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  A model of neuronal responses in visual area MT , 1998, Vision Research.

[16]  R. Hetherington.  The Perception of the Visual World , 1952 .

[17]  E. Adelson,et al.  Phenomenal coherence of moving visual patterns , 1982, Nature.

[18]  A. Pantle,et al.  Physiological Basis of Motion Perception , 1978 .

[19]  D C Van Essen,et al.  Functional properties of neurons in middle temporal visual area of the macaque monkey. I. Selectivity for stimulus direction, speed, and orientation. , 1983, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  Margaret E. Sereno.  Neural Computation of Pattern Motion: Modeling Stages of Motion Analysis in the Primate Visual Cortex , 1993 .

[21]  N. Graham.  Visual Pattern Analyzers , 1989 .

[22]  M. Coltheart.  Visual feature-analyzers and after-effects of tilt and curvature. , 1971, Psychological review.

[23]  Andrew B. Watson,et al.  A look at motion in the frequency domain , 1983 .

[24]  A Pantle,et al.  Size-Detecting Mechanisms in Human Vision , 1968, Science.

[25]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Broad tuning for spatial frequency of neural mechanisms underlying visual perception of coherent motion , 1994, Nature.

[26]  D. Sparks,et al.  Population coding of saccadic eye movements by neurons in the superior colliculus , 1988, Nature.

[27]  R. Sekuler,et al.  Adaptation alters perceived direction of motion , 1976, Vision Research.

[28]  M. Georgeson,et al.  Spatial selectivity of contrast adaptation: Models and data , 1984, Vision Research.

[29]  Daniel J. Hannon,et al.  Direction of self-motion is perceived from optical flow , 1988, Nature.

[30]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  A selection model for motion processing in area MT of primates , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[31]  A Pantle,et al.  On the Capacity of Directionally Selective Mechanisms to Encode Different Dimensions of Moving Stimuli , 1978, Perception.

[32]  Alan L. Yuille,et al.  A Model for the Estimate of Local Velocity , 1990, ECCV.

[33]  R Over,et al.  Spatial determinants of the aftereffect of seen motion. , 1973, Vision research.

[34]  E. Adelson,et al.  The analysis of moving visual patterns , 1985 .

[35]  H. Barlow.  Vision: A theory about the functional role and synaptic mechanism of visual after-effects , 1991 .

[36]  N Osaka,et al.  Difference of Spatial Frequency Selectivity between Static and Flicker Motion Aftereffects , 1994, Perception.

[37]  A. Pantle.  Motion aftereffect magnitude as a measure of the spatio-temporal response properties of direction-sensitive analyzers. , 1974, Vision research.

[38]  Allison B. Sekuler,et al.  Motion segregation from speed differences: Evidence for nonlinear processing , 1990, Vision Research.

[39]  J. Ross,et al.  Contrast adaptation and contrast masking in human vision , 1991, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[40]  C. Blakemore,et al.  Size Adaptation: A New Aftereffect , 1969, Science.

[41]  G. Mather.  The Movement Aftereffect and a Distribution-Shift Model for Coding the Direction of Visual Movement , 1980, Perception.

[42]  N. Sutherland.  Figural After-Effects and Apparent Size , 1961 .

[43]  Manuel Suero,et al.  Motion of complex patterns is computed from the perceived motions of their components , 1991, Vision Research.

[44]  A. Watson,et al.  Quest: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[45]  C. Osgood,et al.  A new interpretation of figural after-effects. , 1952, Psychological review.

[46]  Naoyuki Osaka,et al.  Motion aftereffect with flickering test stimuli depends on adapting velocity , 1995, Vision Research.

[47]  K. Nakayama,et al.  A Velocity Analogue of Brightness Contrast , 1973, Perception.

[48]  J J Koenderink,et al.  Affine structure from motion. , 1991, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[49]  C. Blakemore,et al.  The perceived spatial frequency shift: evidence for frequency‐selective neurones in the human brain , 1970, The Journal of physiology.

[50]  S. Shimojo,et al.  Motion capture changes to induced motion at higher luminance contrasts, smaller eccentricities, and larger inducer sizes , 1993, Vision Research.

[51]  H. Rodman,et al.  Coding of visual stimulus velocity in area MT of the macaque , 1987, Vision Research.