Perceived contrast following adaptation: the role of adapting stimulus visibility.

The issue of whether contrast adaptation can reduce the perceived contrast of gratings oriented orthogonal to the adapting stimulus to a greater extent than parallel gratings has been the subject of considerable debate (Snowden and Hammett, 1992; Ross and Speed, 1996). We compared the reductions in perceived contrast of various test gratings oriented parallel and orthogonal to the adapting stimulus across a range of spatial frequencies (2.25-9 c/deg) and adaptation contrasts (0.19-1.0). Our results show that when the adapting stimulus is low in contrast, parallel adaptation effects are always greater than the effects of orthogonal adaptation. When the adapting contrast is increased, however, the difference between parallel and orthogonal effects is reduced. Further increases in adapting contrast can produce a situation where cross-orientation adaptation effects exceed iso-orientation effects. This was observed at low spatial frequencies (2.25 and 4.5 c/deg) only. The difference in the pattern of results obtained at low and high spatial frequencies can be explained in terms of the adapting stimulus visibility. We conclude that cross-orientation adaptation effects can be greater than iso-orientation effects, but only when the adapting stimulus is highly suprathreshold.

[1]  John M. Foley,et al.  Analysis of the effect of pattern adaptation on pattern pedestal effects: A two-process model , 1997, Vision Research.

[2]  J. Ross,et al.  Contrast adaptation and contrast masking in human vision , 1991, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  J. Movshon,et al.  Linearity and Normalization in Simple Cells of the Macaque Primary Visual Cortex , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  G. Legge.  A power law for contrast discrimination , 1981, Vision Research.

[5]  F. Heitger,et al.  The functional role of contrast adaptation , 1988, Vision Research.

[6]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  Accurate control of contrast on microcomputer displays , 1991, Vision Research.

[7]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Contrast gain control in the cat's visual system. , 1985, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  Robert J. Snowden,et al.  Subtractive and divisive adaptation in the human visual system , 1992, Nature.

[9]  J. Ross,et al.  Perceived contrast following adaptation to gratings of different orientations , 1996, Vision Research.

[10]  D. G. Albrecht,et al.  Motion selectivity and the contrast-response function of simple cells in the visual cortex , 1991, Visual Neuroscience.

[11]  Geoffrey M. Boynton,et al.  Forward pattern masking and adaptation: Effects of duration, interstimulus interval, contrast, and spatial and temporal frequency , 1993, Vision Research.

[12]  C. Blakemore,et al.  Orientation Specificity and Spatial Selectivity in Human Vision , 1973, Perception.

[13]  J. J. Koenderink,et al.  Contrast adaptation and contrast gain control , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[14]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Organization of suppression in receptive fields of neurons in cat visual cortex. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  A. Pantle.  Motion aftereffect magnitude as a measure of the spatio-temporal response properties of direction-sensitive analyzers. , 1974, Vision research.

[16]  A. B. Bonds.  Role of Inhibition in the Specification of Orientation Selectivity of Cells in the Cat Striate Cortex , 1989, Visual Neuroscience.

[17]  C Blakemore,et al.  On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[18]  N. Graham.  Visual Pattern Analyzers , 1989 .

[19]  C. Blakemore,et al.  Stimulus specificity in the human visual system. , 1973, Vision research.

[20]  John Ross,et al.  The effects of adaptation and masking on incremental thresholds for contrast , 1993, Vision Research.

[21]  A Pantle,et al.  Size-Detecting Mechanisms in Human Vision , 1968, Science.

[22]  C. McCollough.  Color Adaptation of Edge-Detectors in the Human Visual System , 1965, Science.

[23]  R. Snowden,et al.  Spatial frequency adaptation: Threshold elevation and perceived contrast , 1996, Vision Research.

[24]  R. L. Valois,et al.  The orientation and direction selectivity of cells in macaque visual cortex , 1982, Vision Research.

[25]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[26]  D. Heeger.  Half-squaring in responses of cat striate cells , 1992, Visual Neuroscience.

[27]  D. Burr,et al.  Functional implications of cross-orientation inhibition of cortical visual cells. I. Neurophysiological evidence , 1982, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[28]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[29]  M A Georgeson,et al.  The effect of spatial adaptation on perceived contrast. , 1985, Spatial vision.

[30]  J. Movshon,et al.  Selectivity for orientation and direction of motion of single neurons in cat striate and extrastriate visual cortex. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  D C Van Essen,et al.  Functional properties of neurons in middle temporal visual area of the macaque monkey. I. Selectivity for stimulus direction, speed, and orientation. , 1983, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  M. Georgeson,et al.  Spatial Frequency Selectivity of a Visual Tilt Illusion , 1973, Nature.

[33]  G. F. Cooper,et al.  The angular selectivity of visual cortical cells to moving gratings , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[34]  H. Barlow,et al.  Adaptation to gratings: No compensatory advantages found , 1976, Vision Research.

[35]  J. Gibson,et al.  Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of tilted lines. I. Quantitative studies , 1937 .

[36]  H. Wilson,et al.  Spatial frequency adaptation and contrast gain control , 1993, Vision Research.

[37]  D. G. Albrecht,et al.  Spatial contrast adaptation characteristics of neurones recorded in the cat's visual cortex. , 1984, The Journal of physiology.