Non-parametric test for connectivity detection in multivariate autoregressive networks and application to multiunit activity data

Directed connectivity inference has become a cornerstone in neuroscience following the recent progress in neuroimaging and elctrophysiological techniques to characterize anatomical and functional networks. This paper focuses on the detection of existing connections from the observed activity in networks of 50 to 150 nodes with linear feedback in discrete time. Through the variation of multiple network parameters, our numerical results indicate that directed connections - in the time domain - are more accurately estimated based on the coefficients obtained from multivariate autoregressive (MVAR) than Granger causality analysis, which is based on the error residuals of the same MVAR linear regression. Based on these findings, we propose a non-parametric significance test for connectivity detection, which achieves a good control of false positives (type 1 error) and is robust to various network topologies. When generating surrogate distributions, we compare the effects of circular shifts, random permutations and phase randomization of the observed time series, each breaking down covariances in a specific manner: the MVAR estimates from those shuffled covariances build a null-hypothesis distribution for each connection, from which the original connectivity estimate can be compared. We apply our method to multiunit activity data recorded from Utah electrode arrays in monkey and examine the detected interactions between 25 channels for a proof of concept. The results unravel a non-trivial underlying connectivity structure, which differentiates the effect of incoming and outgoing connections.

[1]  J. Massey CAUSALITY, FEEDBACK AND DIRECTED INFORMATION , 1990 .

[2]  H. Abdi The Bonferonni and Šidák Corrections for Multiple Comparisons , 2006 .

[3]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Controlling the familywise error rate in functional neuroimaging: a comparative review , 2003, Statistical methods in medical research.

[4]  R. Oostenveld,et al.  Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[5]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Thresholding of Statistical Maps in Functional Neuroimaging Using the False Discovery Rate , 2002, NeuroImage.

[6]  Robert Castelo,et al.  A Robust Procedure For Gaussian Graphical Model Search From Microarray Data With p Larger Than n , 2006, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[7]  M. Wand,et al.  Multivariate Locally Weighted Least Squares Regression , 1994 .

[8]  Kelvin So,et al.  Assessing functional connectivity of neural ensembles using directed information , 2012, Journal of neural engineering.

[9]  Gregory A. Worrell,et al.  Ictal source analysis: Localization and imaging of causal interactions in humans , 2007, NeuroImage.

[10]  Tatiana A. Engel,et al.  Selective modulation of cortical state during spatial attention , 2016, Science.

[11]  C. E. Han,et al.  Cluster-Based Statistics for Brain Connectivity in Correlation with Behavioral Measures , 2013, PloS one.

[12]  Luca Faes,et al.  Lag-Specific Transfer Entropy as a Tool to Assess Cardiovascular and Cardiorespiratory Information Transfer , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  P. Roelfsema,et al.  Chronic multiunit recordings in behaving animals: advantages and limitations. , 2005, Progress in brain research.

[14]  J. Geweke,et al.  Measurement of Linear Dependence and Feedback between Multiple Time Series , 1982 .

[15]  Mingzhou Ding,et al.  Analyzing information flow in brain networks with nonparametric Granger causality , 2008, NeuroImage.

[16]  Schreiber,et al.  Measuring information transfer , 2000, Physical review letters.

[17]  S. Bressler,et al.  Granger Causality: Basic Theory and Application to Neuroscience , 2006, q-bio/0608035.

[18]  Xiaoqin Wang,et al.  Wireless multi-channel single unit recording in freely moving and vocalizing primates , 2012, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[19]  Yong-Hua Li,et al.  Localization of epileptogenic zone based on graph analysis of stereo-EEG , 2016, Epilepsy Research.

[20]  F. Babiloni,et al.  Estimation of the cortical functional connectivity with the multimodal integration of high-resolution EEG and fMRI data by directed transfer function , 2005, NeuroImage.

[21]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Permutation inference for the general linear model , 2014, NeuroImage.

[22]  Conrado A. Bosman,et al.  How to detect the Granger-causal flow direction in the presence of additive noise? , 2015, NeuroImage.

[23]  Stanislav Herwik,et al.  A Wireless Multi-Channel Recording System for Freely Behaving Mice and Rats , 2011, PloS one.

[24]  Mingzhou Ding,et al.  Analyzing multiple spike trains with nonparametric granger causality , 2009, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[25]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  Network-based statistic: Identifying differences in brain networks , 2010, NeuroImage.

[26]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[27]  Thomas Schreiber,et al.  Constrained Randomization of Time Series Data , 1998, chao-dyn/9909042.

[28]  N. Bing,et al.  Genetical Genomics Analysis of a Yeast Segregant Population for Transcription Network Inference , 2005, Genetics.

[29]  A. Seth,et al.  Granger causality for state-space models. , 2015, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[30]  Eduardo Martínez-Montes,et al.  False discovery rate and permutation test: An evaluation in ERP data analysis , 2010, Statistics in medicine.

[31]  Daniele Marinazzo,et al.  Synergy and redundancy in the Granger causal analysis of dynamical networks , 2014, New Journal of Physics.

[32]  J. Geweke,et al.  Measures of Conditional Linear Dependence and Feedback between Time Series , 1984 .

[33]  Jens Timmer,et al.  Handbook of time series analysis : recent theoretical developments and applications , 2006 .

[34]  G. Michalareas,et al.  Investigating causality between interacting brain areas with multivariate autoregressive models of MEG sensor data , 2009, NeuroImage.

[35]  Chang-Tsun Li,et al.  Directed Partial Correlation: Inferring Large-Scale Gene Regulatory Network through Induced Topology Disruptions , 2011, PloS one.

[36]  Pedro D. Maia,et al.  Inferring connectivity in networked dynamical systems: Challenges using Granger causality. , 2016, Physical review. E.

[37]  Joachim Gross,et al.  Investigating causality between interacting brain areas with multivariate autoregressive models of MEG sensor data , 2009, NeuroImage.

[38]  Takeshi Amemiya,et al.  Multivariate Regression and Simultaneous Equation Models when the Dependent Variables Are Truncated Normal , 1974 .

[39]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations , 2010, NeuroImage.

[40]  Gustavo Deco,et al.  Task-driven intra- and interarea communications in primate cerebral cortex , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  John C Gore,et al.  Functional MRI and multivariate autoregressive models. , 2010, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[42]  Bin He,et al.  Estimation of Time-Varying Connectivity Patterns Through the Use of an Adaptive Directed Transfer Function , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[43]  Schreiber,et al.  Improved Surrogate Data for Nonlinearity Tests. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[44]  Anil K. Seth,et al.  The MVGC multivariate Granger causality toolbox: A new approach to Granger-causal inference , 2014, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[45]  A. Seth,et al.  Granger Causality Analysis in Neuroscience and Neuroimaging , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[46]  A. Thiele,et al.  A novel electrode–pipette design for simultaneous recording of extracellular spikes and iontophoretic drug application in awake behaving monkeys , 2006, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[47]  Cees Diks,et al.  A general nonparametric bootstrap test for Granger causality , 2001 .

[48]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modelling , 2003, NeuroImage.

[49]  Habib Benali,et al.  Relating Structure and Function in the Human Brain: Relative Contributions of Anatomy, Stationary Dynamics, and Non-stationarities , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[50]  Helmut Ltkepohl,et al.  New Introduction to Multiple Time Series Analysis , 2007 .

[51]  Adam B. Barrett,et al.  Granger causality is designed to measure effect, not mechanism , 2013, Front. Neuroinform..

[52]  Enrico Simonotto,et al.  Learning Structural Equation Models for fMRI , 2006, NIPS.

[53]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Making sense of brain network data , 2013, Nature Methods.

[54]  C. Granger Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods , 1969 .

[55]  Mingzhou Ding,et al.  Evaluating causal relations in neural systems: Granger causality, directed transfer function and statistical assessment of significance , 2001, Biological Cybernetics.

[56]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Granger causality revisited , 2014, NeuroImage.

[57]  Katarzyna J. Blinowska,et al.  A new method of the description of the information flow in the brain structures , 1991, Biological Cybernetics.