Randomly oriented edge arrangements dominate naturalistic arrangements in binocular rivalry

[1]  Jonathan J. Hunt.  Natural scene statistics and the development of the primary visual cortex , 2011 .

[2]  Jonathan J. Hunt,et al.  Statistical structure of lateral connections in the primary visual cortex , 2011, Neural systems & circuits.

[3]  F. Kingdom,et al.  The role of co-circularity of local elements in texture perception. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[4]  M. Bindemann.  Scene and screen center bias early eye movements in scene viewing , 2010, Vision Research.

[5]  J. Enns,et al.  Spatial selection and target identification are separable processes in visual search. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[6]  Piers D. L. Howe,et al.  A laminar cortical model of monocular and binocular interactions in depth perception , 2010 .

[7]  I. Motoyoshi,et al.  Adaptation-induced blindness to sluggish stimuli. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[8]  Derek H. Arnold,et al.  Binocular rivalry: spreading dominance through complex images. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[9]  C. Clifford.  Binocular rivalry , 2009, Current Biology.

[10]  Miriam Furst,et al.  Stochastic Properties of Coincidence-Detector Neural Cells , 2009, Neural Computation.

[11]  Huajin Tang,et al.  Natural scene statistics and the structure of orientation maps in the visual cortex , 2009, NeuroImage.

[12]  F. Scharnowski,et al.  Long-lasting modulation of feature integration by transcranial magnetic stimulation. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[13]  Erich W Graf,et al.  Natural images dominate in binocular rivalry , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  Jeffrey S. Perry,et al.  Contour statistics in natural images: Grouping across occlusions , 2009, Visual Neuroscience.

[15]  Pierre Baldi,et al.  Bayesian surprise attracts human attention , 2005, Vision Research.

[16]  Min-Suk Kang.  Size matters: a study of binocular rivalry dynamics. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[17]  W. Geisler.  Visual perception and the statistical properties of natural scenes. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[18]  L. Zhaoping.  Attention capture by eye of origin singletons even without awareness--a hallmark of a bottom-up saliency map in the primary visual cortex. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[19]  Tim K Marks,et al.  SUN: A Bayesian framework for saliency using natural statistics. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[20]  Christof Koch,et al.  Predicting human gaze using low-level saliency combined with face detection , 2007, NIPS.

[21]  R. Blake,et al.  Stimulus Motion Propels Traveling Waves in Binocular Rivalry , 2007, PloS one.

[22]  J. Alonso,et al.  Adaptation to Stimulus Contrast and Correlations during Natural Visual Stimulation , 2007, Neuron.

[23]  Eli Brenner,et al.  Flexibility in intercepting moving objects. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[24]  Preeti Verghese,et al.  Where to look next? Eye movements reduce local uncertainty. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[25]  P. Dayan,et al.  Space and time in visual context , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[26]  R. Blake,et al.  Neural bases of binocular rivalry , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[27]  Richard H. A. H. Jacobs,et al.  The time course of binocular rivalry reveals a fundamental role of noise. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[28]  Ohad Ben-Shahar,et al.  Visual saliency and texture segregation without feature gradient , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  Attention Speeds Binocular Rivalry , 2006, Psychological science.

[30]  Thorsten Joachims,et al.  The influence of task and gender on search and evaluation behavior using Google , 2006, Inf. Process. Manag..

[31]  D. Alais,et al.  Contour interactions between pairs of Gabors engaged in binocular rivalry reveal a map of the association field , 2006, Vision Research.

[32]  Yee-Joon Kim,et al.  Stochastic resonance in binocular rivalry , 2006, Vision Research.

[33]  Li Zhaoping,et al.  Theoretical understanding of the early visual processes by data compression and data selection , 2006, Network.

[34]  R. Blake,et al.  Endogenous attention prolongs dominance durations in binocular rivalry. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[35]  John K. Tsotsos,et al.  Saliency Based on Information Maximization , 2005, NIPS.

[36]  N. Scott-Samuel,et al.  Idiosyncratic initiation of saccadic face exploration in humans , 2005, Vision Research.

[37]  Wilson S. Geisler,et al.  Grouping local orientation and direction signals to extract spatial contours: Empirical tests of “association field” models of contour integration , 2005, Vision Research.

[38]  M. Meister,et al.  Dynamic predictive coding by the retina , 2005, Nature.

[39]  Wilson S. Geisler,et al.  Optimal eye movement strategies in visual search , 2005, Nature.

[40]  Norbert Krüger,et al.  Collinearity and Parallelism are Statistically Significant Second-Order Relations of Complex Cell Responses , 1998, Neural Processing Letters.

[41]  J. Elder,et al.  Ecological statistics of Gestalt laws for the perceptual organization of contours. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[42]  Derrick J. Parkhurst,et al.  Modeling the role of salience in the allocation of overt visual attention , 2002, Vision Research.

[43]  R. Blake.  © 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. 5 A Primer on Binocular Rivalry, Including Current Controversies , 2000 .

[44]  Jeffrey S. Perry,et al.  Edge co-occurrence in natural images predicts contour grouping performance , 2001, Vision Research.

[45]  C. Gilbert,et al.  On a common circle: natural scenes and Gestalt rules. , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[46]  M. Langer.  Large-scale failures of f -α scaling in natural image spectra , 2000 .

[47]  A. Dickinson,et al.  Neuronal coding of prediction errors. , 2000, Annual review of neuroscience.

[48]  R. Blake,et al.  Grouping visual features during binocular rivalry , 1999, Vision Research.

[49]  P Reinagel,et al.  Natural scene statistics at the centre of gaze. , 1999, Network.

[50]  M. Langer.  Large-scale failures of f 2 a scaling in natural image spectra , 1999 .

[51]  D. Sagi,et al.  Configuration saliency revealed in short duration binocular rivalry , 1999, Vision Research.

[52]  S. Grossberg,et al.  Texture segregation, surface representation and figure–ground separation , 1998, Vision Research.

[53]  J. V. van Hateren,et al.  Independent component filters of natural images compared with simple cells in primary visual cortex , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[54]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  The “independent components” of natural scenes are edge filters , 1997, Vision Research.

[55]  M. Behrmann,et al.  Patterns of eye movements during parallel and serial visual search tasks. , 1997, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[56]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[57]  William T. Freeman,et al.  Presented at: 2nd Annual IEEE International Conference on Image , 1995 .

[58]  M. Landy,et al.  Discrimination of orientation-defined texture edges , 1995, Vision Research.

[59]  S. R. Lehky.  Binocular rivalry is not chaotic , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[60]  J. Atick,et al.  STATISTICS OF NATURAL TIME-VARYING IMAGES , 1995 .

[61]  William Bialek,et al.  Statistics of Natural Images: Scaling in the Woods , 1993, NIPS.

[62]  U. Polat,et al.  Lateral interactions between spatial channels: Suppression and facilitation revealed by lateral masking experiments , 1993, Vision Research.

[63]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Newborns' preferential tracking of face-like stimuli and its subsequent decline , 1991, Cognition.

[64]  R. Blake,et al.  Temporal perturbations of binocular rivalry , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[65]  J. P. Jones,et al.  An evaluation of the two-dimensional Gabor filter model of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[66]  D J Field,et al.  Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[67]  C. D. Gelatt,et al.  Optimization by Simulated Annealing , 1983, Science.

[68]  M. Hollins,et al.  The effect of contrast on the completeness of binocular rivalry suppression , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[69]  P. Walker.  Stochastic properties of binocular rivalry alternations , 1975 .

[70]  R. W. Rodieck,et al.  The cat local electroretinogram to incremental stimuli , 1969 .

[71]  P. Whittle.  Binocular Rivalry and the Contrast at Contours , 1965, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[72]  Vision Research , 1961, Nature.

[73]  RussLL L. Ds Vnlos,et al.  SPATIAL FREQUENCY SELECTIVITY OF CELLS IN MACAQUE VISUAL CORTEX , 2022 .