Anti-windup for exponentially unstable linear systems with inputs limited in magnitude and rate

A new anti-windup algorithm guarantees that: 1) if the control does not reach actuator limits, the performance is given by a nominal (predesigned) controller; and 2) when the actuator limits are reached, the algorithm preserves stability and enforces restricted set-point tracking.

[1]  J. Lozier,et al.  A steady state approach to the theory of saturable servo systems , 1956 .

[2]  Roy S. Smith,et al.  Control of Plants with Input Saturation Nonlinearities , 1987, 1987 American Control Conference.

[3]  Michel Kinnaert,et al.  Conditioning technique, a general anti-windup and bumpless transfer method , 1987, Autom..

[4]  Lars Rundqwist,et al.  Integrator Windup and How to Avoid It , 1989, 1989 American Control Conference.

[5]  J. Sternby,et al.  Inherent Observer Property in a Class of Anti-Windup Compensators , 1990 .

[6]  K. T. Tan,et al.  Linear systems with state and control constraints: the theory and application of maximal output admissible sets , 1991 .

[7]  Bruce H. Krogh,et al.  On the computation of reference signal constraints for guaranteed tracking performance , 1992, Autom..

[8]  Manfred Morari,et al.  Some Control Problems in the Process Industries , 1993 .

[9]  Jean B. Lasserre,et al.  Reachable, controllable sets and stabilizing control of constrained linear systems , 1993, Autom..

[10]  Alex Zheng,et al.  Anti-windup design for internal model control , 1994 .

[11]  Graham C. Goodwin,et al.  Control system design issues for unstable linear systems with saturated inputs , 1995 .

[12]  K. T. Tan,et al.  Discrete‐time reference governors and the nonlinear control of systems with state and control constraints , 1995 .

[13]  A. Megretski,et al.  L 2 Bibo Output Feedback Stabilization With Saturated Control , 1996 .

[14]  L2 performance induced by feedbacks with multiple saturations , 1996 .

[15]  G. Vinnicombe,et al.  Robust control of plants with saturation nonlinearity based on coprime factor representations , 1996, Proceedings of 35th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[16]  A. Teel.  A nonlinear small gain theorem for the analysis of control systems with saturation , 1996, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[17]  Wright-Patterson Afb,et al.  ANTI-WINDUP FOR AN F-16's DAISY CHAIN , 1997 .

[18]  Andrew R. Teel,et al.  Uniting local and global controllers , 1997, 1997 European Control Conference (ECC).

[19]  Eric Feron,et al.  High performance bounded control of systems subject to input rate constraints , 1997 .

[20]  Eric Feron,et al.  HIGH PERFORMANCE BOUNDED CONTROL OF SYSTEMS SUBJECT TO INPUT AND INPUT RATE CONSTRAINTS , 1997 .

[21]  A. R. Teel,et al.  A dynamic windup compensation scheme applied to a turbofan engine , 1997, Proceedings of the 36th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[22]  M. Pachter,et al.  Manual flight control with saturating actuators , 1998 .

[23]  Meir Pachter,et al.  The construction of the set of stable states for constrained systems with open-loop unstable plants , 1998, Proceedings of the 1998 American Control Conference. ACC (IEEE Cat. No.98CH36207).

[24]  Randy A. Freeman,et al.  Integrator backstepping for rounded controls and control rates , 1998, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[25]  Zongli Lin,et al.  Semi-global stabilization of discrete-time linear systems with position and rate-limited actuators , 1998 .

[26]  Franco Blanchini,et al.  Set invariance in control , 1999, Autom..

[27]  A. Teel.  Anti-windup for exponentially unstable linear systems , 1999 .

[28]  Jeff S. Shamma,et al.  Anti-windup via constrained regulation with observers , 2000, Proceedings of the 1999 American Control Conference (Cat. No. 99CH36251).

[29]  Luca Zaccarian,et al.  Anti-windup design for manual flight control , 1999, Proceedings of the 1999 American Control Conference (Cat. No. 99CH36251).