Supporting asynchronous, discontinuous, collaborative, complex search tasks by the visualization of search trails

requirements derived from the related work .............................................. 104 3.1.2 3.2 Deriving technical features from the abstract requirements ............................................ 115 3.3 Concept of SearchTrails .................................................................................................. 128 3.4 Rough architecture of SearchTrails ................................................................................. 134 3.5 Conclusion and outlook ................................................................................................... 136 Implementation ......................................................................................................... 137 Chapter 4 4.1 SearchTrails architecture ................................................................................................. 137 4.2 Technical implementation decisions and integrated services and frameworks ............... 142 Selected browser and browser extension details ...................................................... 143 4.2.1 Integrated services and frameworks ......................................................................... 144 4.2.2 Generated data .......................................................................................................... 147 4.2.3 Remote search trails storage ..................................................................................... 151 4.2.4 4.3 Design iterations ............................................................................................................. 153 Paper prototypes ....................................................................................................... 154 4.3.1 4.3.1.1 Search graphs .................................................................................................... 154 4.3.1.2 Creating search trails ......................................................................................... 158 SemanticClipboard: A first prototype ...................................................................... 162 4.3.2 First evaluated version of SearchTrails .................................................................... 164 4.3.3 Second evaluated version of SearchTrails ............................................................... 167 4.3.4 4.4 Conclusion and outlook ................................................................................................... 174 Evaluation ................................................................................................................. 175 Chapter 5

[1]  Dirk Lewandowski,et al.  Search-logger analyzing exploratory search tasks , 2011, SAC.

[2]  Elaine Toms,et al.  WiIRE: the Web interactive information retrieval experimentation system prototype , 2004, Inf. Process. Manag..

[3]  Michael E. Orrison,et al.  The Linear Complexity of a Graph , 2006, Electron. J. Comb..

[4]  Robert G. Capra,et al.  Designing exploratory search tasks for user studies of information seeking support systems , 2009, JCDL '09.

[5]  Dirk Lewandowski,et al.  Query types and search topics of German Web search engine users , 2007, Inf. Serv. Use.

[6]  Daniel E. Rose,et al.  Understanding user goals in web search , 2004, WWW '04.

[7]  Dirk Lewandowski,et al.  Ordinary search engine users assessing difficulty, effort, and outcome for simple and complex search tasks , 2012, IIiX.

[8]  Tayfur Altiok,et al.  The Allocation of Interstage Buffer Capacities in Production Lines , 1983 .

[9]  David Pauleen Personal knowledge management: Putting the "person" back into the knowledge equation , 2009, Online Inf. Rev..

[10]  Gary Marchionini,et al.  Editorial: Evaluating exploratory search systems , 2008 .

[11]  Wei Xu,et al.  Facilitate Complex Search Tasks in Hypertext by Externalizing Functional Properties of a Work Domain , 1999, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[12]  Jacek Gwizdka,et al.  Revisiting search task difficulty: Behavioral and individual difference measures , 2008, ASIST.

[13]  Dirk Lewandowski,et al.  Ordinary search engine users carrying out complex search tasks , 2012, J. Inf. Sci..

[14]  Dirk Lewandowski,et al.  Impact of Gender and Age on performing Search Tasks Online , 2012, MuC.

[15]  Robert W. Reeder,et al.  WebEyeMapper and WebLogger: tools for analyzing eye tracking data collected in web-use studies , 2001, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[16]  Nishanth R. Sastry,et al.  Sharing the Loves: Understanding the How and Why of Online Content Curation , 2013, ICWSM.

[17]  Das bibliothekarische Konzept der Informationskompetenz: ein Überblick , 2005 .

[18]  Meredith Ringel Morris,et al.  CoSense: enhancing sensemaking for collaborative web search , 2009, CHI.

[19]  A. Irving Study and information skills across the curriculum , 1985 .

[20]  Chun Wei Choo,et al.  A behavioral model of information seeking on the web: preliminary results of a study of how managers and IT specialists use the web , 1998 .

[21]  Marti A. Hearst Clustering versus faceted categories for information exploration , 2006, Commun. ACM.

[22]  Meredith Ringel Morris,et al.  Collaborative search revisited , 2013, CSCW.

[23]  Tantek Çelik,et al.  Microformats: a pragmatic path to the semantic web , 2006, WWW '06.

[24]  Georg Singer,et al.  Web search engines and complex information needs , 2012 .

[25]  C. Kuhlthau Developing a Model of the Library Search Process: Cognitive and Affective Aspects. , 1988 .

[26]  Frank van Harmelen,et al.  Exploring large document repositories with RDF technology: the DOPE project , 2004, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[27]  Rohit Khare,et al.  Microformats: the next (small) thing on the semantic Web? , 2006, IEEE Internet Computing.

[28]  Peter Mambrey,et al.  POLITeam: Bridging the Gap between Bonn and Berlin for and with the Users , 1995, ECSCW.

[29]  Amanda Spink,et al.  Real life, real users, and real needs: a study and analysis of user queries on the web , 2000, Inf. Process. Manag..

[30]  Bernard J. Jansen Using temporal patterns of interactions to design effective automated searching assistance , 2006, CACM.

[31]  Mark Claypool,et al.  Implicit interest indicators , 2001, IUI '01.

[32]  Nadine Höchstötter Suchverhalten im Web : Erhebung, Analyse und Möglichkeiten , 2007 .

[33]  Judy M. Pitts,et al.  Brainstorms and Blueprints: Teaching Library Research as a Thinking Process , 1988 .

[34]  Susan T. Dumais,et al.  Exploring personal information , 2006, Commun. ACM.

[35]  Abdigani Diriye,et al.  The future is in the past: designing for exploratory search , 2012, IIiX.

[36]  Bettina Berendt,et al.  Report on the TrebleCLEF query log analysis workshop 2009 , 2009, SIGF.

[37]  Jene Diane Hendrickson,et al.  Comparison of Newton-type and direct search algorithms for calibration of conceptual rainfall-runoff models , 1988 .

[38]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Science in Information Systems Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[39]  Peter Eades,et al.  Journal of Graph Algorithms and Applications Navigating Clustered Graphs Using Force-directed Methods , 2022 .

[40]  Eli Pariser,et al.  The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You , 2011 .

[41]  Martin Halvey,et al.  An asynchronous collaborative search system for online video search , 2010, Inf. Process. Manag..

[42]  Ariel J. Frank,et al.  The parallel evolution of search engines and digital libraries: their convergence to the Mega-Portal , 2000, Proceedings 2000 Kyoto International Conference on Digital Libraries: Research and Practice.

[43]  Stephen J. Payne,et al.  Collaborative web search in context: a study of tool use in everyday tasks , 2014, CSCW.

[44]  Stephen Robertson,et al.  THEORIES AND MODELS IN INFORMATION RETRIEVAL , 1977 .

[45]  Ulrich Norbisrath,et al.  Search Strategies of Library Search Experts , 2012, ArXiv.

[46]  Sebastian Franken FacetBrowse: Ein facettenbasierter Dateibrowser für ein Groupware-System , 2009, Mensch & Computer Workshopband.

[47]  Dr. Joseph A Meloche,et al.  A Report on the Second Workshop on Collaborative Information Seeking (cis) Collaborative Information Seeking , 2022 .

[48]  Ulrich Norbisrath,et al.  Complex search: aggregation, discovery, and synthesis , 2012 .

[49]  Thomas A. Mück,et al.  Topic Maps - Semantische Suche im Internet , 2002, Xpert.press.

[50]  Mika Käki,et al.  Information search and re-access strategies of experienced web users , 2005, WWW '05.

[51]  Ed H. Chi,et al.  Towards a model of understanding social search , 2008, SSM '08.

[52]  Darren George,et al.  IBM SPSS Statistics 21 Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference , 2013 .

[53]  G. N. Sandor,et al.  Selective Precision Synthesis—A General Method of Optimization for Planar Mechanisms , 1975 .

[54]  Ryen W. White,et al.  Studying trailfinding algorithms for enhanced web search , 2010, SIGIR.

[55]  John Allsop,et al.  Microformats: Empowering Your Markup for Web 2.0 , 2007 .

[56]  Ulrich Norbisrath,et al.  Supporting the evaluation of complex search tasks with the searchtrails tool , 2014, CASCON.

[57]  Frank van Harmelen,et al.  Ontology-based Information Visualization , 2002, Visualizing the Semantic Web.

[58]  Neil R Smalheiser Informatics and hypothesis‐driven research , 2002, EMBO reports.

[59]  Sergiu Dumitriu,et al.  Knowledge Management in a Wiki Platform via Microformats , 2007, FLAIRS Conference.

[60]  Bernard J. Jansen,et al.  Wrapper: An Application for Evaluating Exploratory Searching Outside of the Lab , 2006 .

[61]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Supporting content curation communities: The case of the Encyclopedia of Life , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[62]  Gary Marchionini,et al.  Exploratory search , 2006, Commun. ACM.

[63]  John E. McEneaney Graphic and numerical methods to assess navigation in hypertext , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..