Make or Shake: An Empirical Study of the Value of Making in Learning about Computing Technology

Learning about computing technology has become an increasingly important part of the school curriculum but it remains unclear how best to teach it to children. Here, we report on an empirical study that investigated how the process of making affects how children of different ages learn about computing technology. In one condition, they had to first make an electronic cube before conducting other activities and in the other they were given a ready made one to use. The results of the study show that for younger children, the making significantly improved their performance in a post-lesson test, whereas the older children performed equally well in both conditions. We discuss possible reasons for this, in terms of differences in creative appropriation. We also saw much spontaneous collaboration between the children that suggests making can encourage a collaborative relationship between children of different ages.

[1]  K. H. Stauder,et al.  Psychology of the Child , 1959 .

[2]  Leah Buechley,et al.  Boda blocks: a collaborative tool for exploring tangible three-dimensional cellular automata , 2007, CSCL.

[3]  Scott R. Klemmer,et al.  Authoring sensor-based interactions by demonstration with direct manipulation and pattern recognition , 2007, CHI.

[4]  Meredith Ringel Morris,et al.  iStuff: a physical user interface toolkit for ubiquitous computing environments , 2003, CHI '03.

[5]  Mikael B. Skov,et al.  A review of research methods in children's technology design , 2005, IDC '05.

[6]  Alex Sandro Gomes,et al.  e-du box: educational multimedia with tangible-enhanced interaction , 2008, DIS '08.

[7]  M. Cole,et al.  Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. L. S. Vygotsky. , 1978 .

[8]  Frank G. Feltham.  Do the blocks rock: a tangible interface for play and exploration , 2008, OZCHI '08.

[9]  Yasmin B. Kafai,et al.  The social turn in K-12 programming: moving from computational thinking to computational participation , 2013, SIGCSE '13.

[10]  Jie Qi,et al.  Microcontrollers as material: crafting circuits with paper, conductive ink, electronic components, and an "untoolkit" , 2013, TEI '13.

[11]  Jie Qi,et al.  Sketching in circuits: designing and building electronics on paper , 2014, CHI.

[12]  Nikolai Veresov,et al.  Zone of proximal development ( ZPD ) : the hidden dimension ? , 2022 .

[13]  Margot Brereton,et al.  Never too old: engaging retired people inventing the future with MaKey MaKey , 2014, CHI.

[14]  E. Hall,et al.  The Hidden Dimension , 1970 .

[15]  Seymour Papert,et al.  Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas , 1981 .

[16]  Ayah Bdeir,et al.  Electronics as material: littleBits , 2010, TEI.

[17]  P. Dillenbourg.  What do you mean by collaborative learning , 1999 .

[18]  Mitchel Resnick,et al.  Some reflections on designing construction kits for kids , 2005, IDC '05.

[19]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  Physically Distributed Learning: Adapting and Reinterpreting Physical Environments in the Development of Fraction Concepts , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[20]  Edith Ackermann,et al.  Perspective-Taking and Object Construction: Two Keys to Learning , 2012 .

[21]  Paulo Blikstein,et al.  LightUp: an augmented, learning platform for electronics , 2013, IDC.

[22]  J. G. Tanenbaum,et al.  Democratizing technology: pleasure, utility and expressiveness in DIY and maker practice , 2013, CHI.

[23]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implica-tions , 1999 .

[24]  Paul Marshall,et al.  Do tangible interfaces enhance learning? , 2007, TEI.

[25]  Leah Buechley,et al.  Handcrafting textile interfaces from a kit-of-no-parts , 2010, TEI.

[26]  J. Mestre.  Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective , 2005 .

[27]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  Tangible bits: towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms , 1997, CHI.

[28]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  EFFICIENCY AND INNOVATION IN TRANSFER , 2005 .

[29]  Alissa Nicole Antle,et al.  Designing tangibles for children: what designers need to know , 2007, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[30]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  Chapter 3: Rethinking Transfer: A Simple Proposal With Multiple Implications , 1999 .

[31]  Chang Liu,et al.  LightUp: a low-cost, multi-age toolkit for learning and prototyping electronics , 2011, IDC.

[32]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  Topobo: a constructive assembly system with kinetic memory , 2004, CHI.

[33]  Mitchel Resnick,et al.  Pianos not stereos: creating computational construction kits , 1996, INTR.

[34]  Saul Greenberg,et al.  Phidgets: easy development of physical interfaces through physical widgets , 2001, UIST '01.

[35]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  CHI '07 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems , 2007, CHI 2007.

[36]  Rita Shewbridge,et al.  Everyday making: identifying future uses for 3D printing in the home , 2014, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.