Equilibrium and efficient clustering of arrival times to a queue

We consider a game of decentralized timing of jobs to a single server (machine) with a penalty for deviation from some due date and no delay costs. The jobs sizes are homogeneous and deterministic. Each job belongs to a single decision maker, a customer, who aims to arrive at a time that minimizes his deviation penalty. If multiple customers arrive at the same time then their order is determined by a uniform random draw. If the cost function has a weighted absolute deviation form then any Nash equilibrium is pure and symmetric, that is, all customers arrive together. Furthermore, we show that there exist multiple, in fact a continuum, of equilibrium arrival times, and provide necessary and sufficient conditions for the socially optimal arrival time to be an equilibrium. The base model is solved explicitly, but the prevalence of a pure symmetric equilibrium is shown to be robust to several relaxations of the assumptions: inclusion of small waiting costs, stochastic job sizes, random sized population, heterogeneous due dates and non-linear deviation penalties.

[1]  Robin Mason,et al.  Investment, uncertainty and pre-emption , 2010 .

[2]  Rahul Jain,et al.  Strategic Arrivals into Queueing Networks: The Network Concert Queueing Game , 2011, Oper. Res..

[3]  Refael Hassin,et al.  ?/M/1: On the equilibrium distribution of customer arrivals , 1983 .

[4]  M. Lambkin Order of entry and performance in new markets , 1988 .

[5]  Eran Hanany,et al.  Decentralization Cost in Scheduling: A Game-Theoretic Approach , 2007, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[6]  Philipp Schmidt-Dengler,et al.  Clustering in N-Player Preemption Games , 2012 .

[7]  Hani S. Mahmassani,et al.  Dynamic User Equilibrium Departure Time and Route Choice on Idealized Traffic Arterials , 1984, Transp. Sci..

[8]  Richard Arnott,et al.  A Model of Rush-Hour Traffic in an Isotropic Downtown Area , 2015 .

[9]  Frank Werner,et al.  Scheduling with common due date, earliness and tardiness penalties for multimachine problems: A survey , 2004, Math. Comput. Model..

[10]  Eliran Sherzer,et al.  When to arrive at a queue with earliness, tardiness and waiting costs , 2017, Perform. Evaluation.

[11]  Surya D. Liman,et al.  Earliness-tardiness scheduling problems with a common delivery window , 1994, Oper. Res. Lett..

[12]  A P,et al.  Caller Number Five and related timing games , 2008 .

[13]  Liron Ravner,et al.  Equilibrium arrival times to a queue with order penalties , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  Lones Smith,et al.  Greed, Fear, and Rushes , 2014 .

[15]  Tami Tamir,et al.  Conflicting Congestion Effects in Resource Allocation Games , 2012, Oper. Res..

[16]  Dan Levin,et al.  To grab for the market or to bide one's time: a dynamic model of entry , 2003 .

[17]  Lars Peter Østerdal,et al.  The curse of the first-in-first-out queue discipline , 2017, Games Econ. Behav..

[18]  D. Fudenberg,et al.  Preemption and Rent Equalization in the Adoption of New Technology , 1985 .

[19]  W. Vickrey Congestion Theory and Transport Investment , 1969 .

[20]  Sandeep Juneja,et al.  The concert queueing game: strategic arrivals with waiting and tardiness costs , 2013, Queueing Syst. Theory Appl..

[21]  Moshe Haviv,et al.  Strategic timing of arrivals to a finite queue multi-server loss system , 2015, Queueing Syst. Theory Appl..

[22]  Gary D. Scudder,et al.  Sequencing with Earliness and Tardiness Penalties: A Review , 1990, Oper. Res..

[23]  Robert E. Tarjan,et al.  One-Processor Scheduling with Symmetric Earliness and Tardiness Penalties , 1988, Math. Oper. Res..

[24]  R. McAfee,et al.  Auctions with a stochastic number of bidders , 1987 .

[25]  Eitan Altman,et al.  The Ordered Timeline Game: Strategic Posting Times Over a Temporally Ordered Shared Medium , 2015, Dynamic Games and Applications.

[26]  Jan A. Van Mieghem,et al.  Strategically Seeking Service: How Competition Can Generate Poisson Arrivals , 2004, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[27]  L. P. Østerdal,et al.  Strategic behavior and social outcomes in a bottleneck queue: experimental evidence , 2014 .

[28]  C. Fornell,et al.  Sources of Market Pioneer Advantages in Consumer Goods Industries , 1985 .

[29]  Marc E. Posner,et al.  Earliness-Tardiness Scheduling Problems, I: Weighted Deviation of Completion Times About a Common Due Date , 1991, Oper. Res..

[30]  A. Palma,et al.  A STRUCTURAL MODEL OF PEAK-PERIOD CONGESTION: A TRAFFIC BOTTLENECK WITH ELASTIC DEMAND. IN: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN TRANSPORT ECONOMICS , 1993 .

[31]  Refael Hassin,et al.  Machine scheduling with earliness, tardiness and non-execution penalties , 2005, Comput. Oper. Res..

[32]  Douglas Gale,et al.  Information Revelation and Strategic Delay in a Model of Investment , 1994 .

[33]  Moshe Haviv,et al.  When to arrive at a queue with tardiness costs? , 2013, Perform. Evaluation.

[34]  A. Glazer The Advantages of Being First , 1985 .

[35]  Gerd Finke,et al.  Scheduling with common due date assignment , 2001, ETFA 2001. 8th International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation. Proceedings (Cat. No.01TH8597).

[36]  John Morgan,et al.  Clock Games: Theory and Experiments , 2004, Games Econ. Behav..

[37]  Hai Le Vu,et al.  A strategic timing of arrivals to a linear slowdown processor sharing system , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[38]  Refael Hassin,et al.  Equilibrium Arrivals in Queues with Bulk Service at Scheduled Times , 1987, Transp. Sci..

[39]  J. M. Smith The theory of games and the evolution of animal conflicts. , 1974, Journal of theoretical biology.

[40]  Yossi Azar,et al.  Optimal Coordination Mechanisms for Unrelated Machine Scheduling , 2015, Oper. Res..

[41]  D. B. Montgomery,et al.  First‐mover advantages , 1988 .

[42]  Refael Hassin,et al.  Equilibrium and optimal arrival patterns to a server with opening and closing times , 2010 .