Feature-Selective Attention in Healthy Old Age: A Selective Decline in Selective Attention?

Deficient selection against irrelevant information has been proposed to underlie age-related cognitive decline. We recently reported evidence for maintained early sensory selection when older and younger adults used spatial selective attention to perform a challenging task. Here we explored age-related differences when spatial selection is not possible and feature-selective attention must be deployed. We additionally compared the integrity of feedforward processing by exploiting the well established phenomenon of suppression of visual cortical responses attributable to interstimulus competition. Electroencephalogram was measured while older and younger human adults responded to brief occurrences of coherent motion in an attended stimulus composed of randomly moving, orientation-defined, flickering bars. Attention was directed to horizontal or vertical bars by a pretrial cue, after which two orthogonally oriented, overlapping stimuli or a single stimulus were presented. Horizontal and vertical bars flickered at different frequencies and thereby elicited separable steady-state visual-evoked potentials, which were used to examine the effect of feature-based selection and the competitive influence of a second stimulus on ongoing visual processing. Age differences were found in feature-selective attentional modulation of visual responses: older adults did not show consistent modulation of magnitude or phase. In contrast, the suppressive effect of a second stimulus was robust and comparable in magnitude across age groups, suggesting that bottom-up processing of the current stimuli is essentially unchanged in healthy old age. Thus, it seems that visual processing per se is unchanged, but top-down attentional control is compromised in older adults when space cannot be used to guide selection.

[1]  Allison B. Sekuler,et al.  The effect of aging on the orientational selectivity of the human visual system , 2009, Vision Research.

[2]  Allison M McKendrick,et al.  Aging effects on collinear facilitation. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[3]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[4]  Aaron R. Seitz,et al.  What a difference a parameter makes: A psychophysical comparison of random dot motion algorithms , 2009, Vision Research.

[5]  J. Hohnsbein,et al.  Sensorimotor slowing with ageing is mediated by a functional dysregulation of motor-generation processes: evidence from high-resolution event-related potentials. , 2004, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[6]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  Selective attention to spatial and non-spatial visual stimuli is affected differentially by age: effects on event-related brain potentials and performance data. , 2006, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[7]  J. Maunsell,et al.  The role of attention in visual processing. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[8]  M. Bach,et al.  The Freiburg Visual Acuity test--automatic measurement of visual acuity. , 1996, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[9]  Alex R. Wade,et al.  Representation of Concurrent Stimuli by Population Activity in Visual Cortex , 2009, Neuron.

[10]  R. Snowden,et al.  Motion Perception in the Ageing Visual System: Minimum Motion, Motion Coherence, and Speed Discrimination Thresholds , 2006, Perception.

[11]  E Donchin,et al.  A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. , 1983, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[12]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  Keeping focused: Sustained spatial selective visual attention is maintained in healthy old age , 2012, Brain Research.

[13]  Marisa Carrasco,et al.  Feature-Based Attention Modulates Orientation-Selective Responses in Human Visual Cortex , 2007, Neuron.

[14]  S. Folstein,et al.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. , 1975, Journal of psychiatric research.

[15]  G. Karmos,et al.  Entrainment of Neuronal Oscillations as a Mechanism of Attentional Selection , 2008, Science.

[16]  Rick Gurnsey,et al.  Limits of peripheral direction discrimination of point-light walkers. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[17]  A. Leventhal,et al.  Degradation of stimulus selectivity of visual cortical cells in senescent rhesus monkeys , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  Frédéric Gosselin,et al.  Clouds are not normal occluders, and other oddities: more interactions between textures and lightness illusions. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[19]  Steven A. Hillyard,et al.  Attention Facilitates Multiple Stimulus Features in Parallel in Human Visual Cortex , 2008, Current Biology.

[20]  Alex R. Wade,et al.  Representation of Concurrent Stimuli by Population Activity in Visual Cortex , 2014, Neuron.

[21]  Harriet A Allen,et al.  The role of contrast sensitivity in global motion processing deficits in the elderly. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[22]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[23]  Jasna Martinovic,et al.  Bottom-Up Biases in Feature-Selective Attention , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  R. Desimone,et al.  A backward progression of attentional effects in the ventral stream , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  Lynn Hasher,et al.  Working Memory, Comprehension, and Aging: A Review and a New View , 1988 .

[26]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  Independent effects of attentional gain control and competitive interactions on visual stimulus processing. , 2013, Cerebral cortex.

[27]  Lynn Hasher,et al.  Inhibitory deficit theory: Recent developments in a "new view" , 2007 .

[28]  The Role of Attention in Visual Processing , 1991 .

[29]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  Color-selective attention need not be mediated by spatial attention. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[30]  Søren K. Andersen,et al.  Feature-selective attention: Evidence for a decline in old age , 2010, Neuroscience Letters.

[31]  J. Victor,et al.  A new statistic for steady-state evoked potentials. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[32]  Taylor W. Schmitz,et al.  Failing to Ignore: Paradoxical Neural Effects of Perceptual Load on Early Attentional Selection in Normal Aging , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[33]  Søren K. Andersen,et al.  Effects of Feature-selective and Spatial Attention at Different Stages of Visual Processing , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[34]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[35]  Ming Bo Cai,et al.  A neural model for temporal order judgments and their active recalibration: a common mechanism for space and time? , 2010 .

[36]  S A Hillyard,et al.  Feature-selective attention enhances color signals in early visual areas of the human brain , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  B. Rockstroh,et al.  Statistical control of artifacts in dense array EEG/MEG studies. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[38]  C. Owsley Aging and vision , 2011, Vision Research.