Translating pharmacodynamic biomarkers from bench to bedside: analytical validation and fit-for-purpose studies to qualify multiplex immunofluorescent assays for use on clinical core biopsy specimens.

Multiplex pharmacodynamic (PD) assays have the potential to increase sensitivity of biomarker-based reporting for new targeted agents, as well as revealing significantly more information about target and pathway activation than single-biomarker PD assays. Stringent methodology is required to ensure reliable and reproducible results. Common to all PD assays is the importance of reagent validation, assay and instrument calibration, and the determination of suitable response calibrators; however, multiplex assays, particularly those performed on paraffin specimens from tissue blocks, bring format-specific challenges adding a layer of complexity to assay development. We discuss existing multiplex approaches and the development of a multiplex immunofluorescence assay measuring DNA damage and DNA repair enzymes in response to anti-cancer therapeutics and describe how our novel method addresses known issues.

[1]  E. Kohn,et al.  Constitution and quantity of lysis buffer alters outcome of reverse phase protein microarrays , 2007, Proteomics.

[2]  E. Sausville,et al.  Phase I Safety, Pharmacokinetic, and Pharmacodynamic Study of the Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase (PARP) Inhibitor Veliparib (ABT-888) in Combination with Irinotecan in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors , 2016, Clinical Cancer Research.

[3]  D. Rimm,et al.  Automated subcellular localization and quantification of protein expression in tissue microarrays , 2002, Nature Medicine.

[4]  D. Rimm,et al.  Standardization of estrogen receptor measurement in breast cancer suggests false-negative results are a function of threshold intensity rather than percentage of positive cells. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  J. Kutok,et al.  Phase II evaluation of IPI-926, an oral Hedgehog inhibitor, in patients with myelofibrosis , 2015, Leukemia & lymphoma.

[6]  Marcus Oswald,et al.  Evaluation of reverse phase protein array (RPPA)-based pathway-activation profiling in 84 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell lines as platform for cancer proteomics and biomarker discovery. , 2014, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[7]  D. Rimm,et al.  Automated quantitative analysis (AQUA) of in situ protein expression, antibody concentration, and prognosis. , 2005, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[8]  Yiling Lu,et al.  Using reverse-phase protein arrays as pharmacodynamic assays for functional proteomics, biomarker discovery, and drug development in cancer. , 2016, Seminars in oncology.

[9]  J. Soria,et al.  Phase I Study of Dovitinib (TKI258), an Oral FGFR, VEGFR, and PDGFR Inhibitor, in Advanced or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma , 2013, Clinical Cancer Research.

[10]  Larry Rubinstein,et al.  Phase 0 clinical trial of the poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor ABT-888 in patients with advanced malignancies. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  Yvonne A. Evrard,et al.  Development of a Validated Immunofluorescence Assay for γH2AX as a Pharmacodynamic Marker of Topoisomerase I Inhibitor Activity , 2010, Clinical Cancer Research.

[12]  K. Baggerly,et al.  Preclinical and Early Clinical Evaluation of the Oral AKT Inhibitor, MK-2206, for the Treatment of Acute Myelogenous Leukemia , 2014, Clinical Cancer Research.

[13]  D. Chan,et al.  Validation of a multiplex immunoassay for serum angiogenic factors as biomarkers for aggressive prostate cancer. , 2012, Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry.

[14]  Nianxiang Zhang,et al.  Reverse-Phase Protein Array Analysis to Identify Biomarker Proteins in Human Pancreatic Cancer , 2013, Digestive Diseases and Sciences.

[15]  Jingchun Zhu,et al.  Realizing the Promise of Reverse Phase Protein Arrays for Clinical, Translational, and Basic Research: A Workshop Report , 2014, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[16]  Olivier Sordet,et al.  γ-H2AX detection in peripheral blood lymphocytes, splenocytes, bone marrow, xenografts, and skin. , 2011, Methods in molecular biology.

[17]  W. Böcker,et al.  Complex H2AX phosphorylation patterns by multiple kinases including ATM and DNA‐PK in human cells exposed to ionizing radiation and treated with kinase inhibitors , 2005, Journal of cellular physiology.

[18]  H. Höfler,et al.  Activation of the PI3K/AKT pathway correlates with prognosis in stage II colon cancer , 2014, British Journal of Cancer.

[19]  J. Doroshow,et al.  Phase I trial of AZD1775 (MK1775), a wee1 kinase inhibitor, in patients with refractory solid tumors. , 2014 .

[20]  C. Bassing,et al.  ATR and H2AX Cooperate in Maintaining Genome Stability under Replication Stress* , 2009, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[21]  R. Parchment,et al.  Implementation of Validated Pharmacodynamic Assays in Multiple Laboratories: Challenges, Successes, and Limitations , 2014, Clinical Cancer Research.

[22]  J. J. Macklin,et al.  A general method to improve fluorophores for live-cell and single-molecule microscopy , 2014, Nature Methods.

[23]  M. Braun,et al.  Spheroid formation of human thyroid cancer cells under simulated microgravity: a possible role of CTGF and CAV1 , 2014, Cell Communication and Signaling.

[24]  D. Esposito,et al.  Effect of a Smac Mimetic (TL32711, Birinapant) on the Apoptotic Program and Apoptosis Biomarkers Examined with Validated Multiplex Immunoassays Fit for Clinical Use , 2015, Clinical Cancer Research.

[25]  L. Rubinstein,et al.  Preclinical Modeling of a Phase 0 Clinical Trial: Qualification of a Pharmacodynamic Assay of Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase in Tumor Biopsies of Mouse Xenografts , 2008, Clinical Cancer Research.

[26]  Ioan Tabus,et al.  Analysis of signaling pathways in 90 cancer cell lines by protein lysate array. , 2007, Journal of proteome research.

[27]  P. Bonate,et al.  Phase II Study Evaluating 2 Dosing Schedules of Oral Foretinib (GSK1363089), cMET/VEGFR2 Inhibitor, in Patients with Metastatic Gastric Cancer , 2013, PloS one.

[28]  E. Sausville,et al.  Phase I study of the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor veliparib (ABT-888; V) in combination with irinotecan (CPT-11; Ir) in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[29]  George G Klee,et al.  Measurement and quality control issues in multiplex protein assays: a case study. , 2009, Clinical chemistry.

[30]  Jean W Lee,et al.  Method validation and application of protein biomarkers: basic similarities and differences from biotherapeutics. , 2009, Bioanalysis.

[31]  U. Olsson‐Strömberg,et al.  The Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Imatinib and Dasatinib Reduce Myeloid Suppressor Cells and Release Effector Lymphocyte Responses , 2015, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

[32]  K. Giese,et al.  First-in-human phase I study of the liposomal RNA interference therapeutic Atu027 in patients with advanced solid tumors. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[33]  L. True,et al.  Impact of Preanalytic Factors on the Design and Application of Integral Biomarkers for Directing Patient Therapy , 2012, Clinical Cancer Research.