Indirect Reciprocity and the Evolution of Prejudicial Groups

Prejudicial attitudes are widely seen between human groups, with significant consequences. Actions taken in light of prejudice result in discrimination, and can contribute to societal division and hostile behaviours. We define a new class of group, the prejudicial group, with membership based on a common prejudicial attitude towards the out-group. It is assumed that prejudice acts as a phenotypic tag, enabling groups to form and identify themselves on this basis. Using computational simulation, we study the evolution of prejudicial groups, where members interact through indirect reciprocity. We observe how cooperation and prejudice coevolve, with cooperation being directed in-group. We also consider the co-evolution of these variables when out-group interaction and global learning are immutable, emulating the possible pluralism of a society. Diversity through three factors is found to be influential, namely out-group interaction, out-group learning and number of sub-populations. Additionally populations with greater in-group interaction promote both cooperation and prejudice, while global rather than local learning promotes cooperation and reduces prejudice. The results also demonstrate that prejudice is not dependent on sophisticated human cognition and is easily manifested in simple agents with limited intelligence, having potential implications for future autonomous systems and human-machine interaction.

[1]  Luis A. Martinez-Vaquero,et al.  Spreading of intolerance under economic stress: results from a reputation-based model. , 2014, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[2]  Simon L. Cotton,et al.  Device-to-Device Communications: A Performance Analysis in the Context of Social Comparison-Based Relaying , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[3]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The Evolution of Cooperation , 1984 .

[4]  R. D. Alexander The biology of moral systems , 1989 .

[5]  S. Wright,et al.  Isolation by Distance. , 1943, Genetics.

[6]  O. Leimar,et al.  Evolution of cooperation through indirect reciprocity , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  T. Pettigrew Intergroup contact theory. , 1998, Annual review of psychology.

[8]  Yoh Iwasa,et al.  The leading eight: social norms that can maintain cooperation by indirect reciprocity. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[9]  Rupert Brown,et al.  An integrative theory of intergroup contact , 2005 .

[10]  H. Tajfel,et al.  Social categorization and intergroup behaviour , 1971 .

[11]  Robin I. M. Dunbar,et al.  Machiavellian Intelligence II: Evolution of the social brain , 1997 .

[12]  Karthik Panchanathan,et al.  A tale of two defectors: the importance of standing for evolution of indirect reciprocity. , 2003, Journal of theoretical biology.

[13]  M. Hogg,et al.  Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. , 1989 .

[14]  P. Richerson,et al.  The evolution of indirect reciprocity , 1989 .

[15]  Naoki Masuda,et al.  Tag-based indirect reciprocity by incomplete social information , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  Gregory M. Herek,et al.  Confronting Sexual Stigma and Prejudice: Theory and Practice , 2007 .

[17]  G. Āllport The Nature of Prejudice , 1954 .

[18]  Jeroen van den Hoven,et al.  Breaking the filter bubble: democracy and design , 2015, Ethics and Information Technology.

[19]  L. Luttrell,et al.  Mechanisms of social reciprocity in three primate species: Symmetrical relationship characteristics or cognition? , 1988 .

[20]  Ross A. Hammond,et al.  Evolution of contingent altruism when cooperation is expensive. , 2006, Theoretical population biology.

[21]  M. Nowak Five Rules for the Evolution of Cooperation , 2006, Science.

[22]  Linda R. Tropp,et al.  Does intergroup contact reduce prejudice: Recent meta-analytic findings. , 2000 .

[23]  Laurie A. Rudman,et al.  Status incongruity and backlash effects: Defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against female leaders. , 2012 .

[24]  Todd D. Nelson Ageism: Stereotyping and prejudice against older persons. , 2003 .

[25]  Robin I. M. Dunbar,et al.  Evolution of the Social Brain , 2003, Science.

[26]  N. Eagle,et al.  Network Diversity and Economic Development , 2010, Science.

[27]  Roger Waldinger,et al.  Creating Networks for Survival and Mobility: Social Capital Among African-American and Latin-American Low-Income Mothers , 2003 .

[28]  Daniel Balliet,et al.  Ingroup favoritism in cooperation: a meta-analysis. , 2014, Psychological bulletin.

[29]  J. Duckitt,et al.  A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice , 2001 .

[30]  Steven L. Neuberg,et al.  INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS AND GROUP PROCESSES Different Emotional Reactions to Different Groups : A Sociofunctional Threat-Based Approach to “ Prejudice ” , 2005 .

[31]  Thomas N. Sherratt,et al.  Behavioural evolution (Communication arising): Does similarity breed cooperation? , 2002, Nature.

[32]  S. Fiske What We Know Now About Bias and Intergroup Conflict, the Problem of the Century , 2002 .

[33]  E. Fehr,et al.  The Coevolution of Cultural Groups and Ingroup Favoritism , 2008, Science.

[34]  David G. Rand,et al.  Human cooperation , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[35]  L. Bobo Group Conflict, Prejudice, and the Paradox of Contemporary Racial Attitudes , 1988 .

[36]  R. Boyd,et al.  Indirect reciprocity can stabilize cooperation without the second-order free rider problem , 2004, Nature.

[37]  M. Brewer The Psychology of Prejudice: Ingroup Love and Outgroup Hate? , 1999 .

[38]  Ángel Gómez,et al.  Empirical Evidence for the Devoted Actor Model , 2016, Current Anthropology.

[39]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[40]  Samuel Bowles,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Som Text Figs. S1 and S2 Table S1 References and Notes the Coevolution of Parochial Altruism and War , 2022 .

[41]  L. Festinger A Theory of Social Comparison Processes , 1954 .

[42]  Rick L. Riolo,et al.  Behavioural evolution (Communication arising): Does similarity breed cooperation? , 2002, Nature.

[43]  Martin A. Nowak,et al.  Powering up with indirect reciprocity in a large-scale field experiment , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[44]  David G. Rand,et al.  The Emergence of “Us and Them” in 80 Lines of Code , 2014, Psychological science.

[45]  Gilbert Roberts,et al.  Behaviorial evolution: does similarity breed cooperation? , 2002, Nature.

[46]  R. Riolo,et al.  Evolution of cooperation without reciprocity , 2001, Nature.

[47]  M. Nowak,et al.  Evolution of indirect reciprocity , 2005, Nature.

[48]  Hannes Rusch,et al.  The evolutionary interplay of intergroup conflict and altruism in humans: a review of parochial altruism theory and prospects for its extension , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[49]  Scott Atran,et al.  The Devoted Actor , 2016, Current Anthropology.

[50]  Ernst Fehr,et al.  Parochial altruism in humans , 2006, Nature.

[51]  Iyad Rahwan,et al.  Cooperating with machines , 2017, Nature Communications.

[52]  Robin I. M. Dunbar Psychology. Evolution of the social brain. , 2003 .

[53]  E. Fehr Human behaviour: Don't lose your reputation , 2004, Nature.

[54]  M A Nowak,et al.  The dynamics of indirect reciprocity. , 1998, Journal of theoretical biology.

[55]  Stuart M. Allen,et al.  A Dominant Social Comparison Heuristic Unites Alternative Mechanisms for the Evolution of Indirect Reciprocity , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[56]  Samuel Bowles,et al.  Being human: Conflict: Altruism's midwife , 2008, Nature.

[57]  M. Nowak,et al.  Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring , 1998, Nature.

[58]  Martin A. Nowak,et al.  Chromodynamics of Cooperation in Finite Populations , 2007, PloS one.

[59]  Martin A. Nowak,et al.  Evolution of cooperation by phenotypic similarity , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[60]  David Hales,et al.  Cooperation without Memory or Space: Tags, Groups and the Prisoner's Dilemma , 2000, MABS.

[61]  Jerry Suls,et al.  Handbook of social comparison : theory and research , 2000 .

[62]  Susan T. Fiske,et al.  Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination at the seam between the centuries: evolution, culture, mind, and brain , 2000 .

[63]  Silvia Domínguez,et al.  Creating networks for survival and mobility: social capital among African-American and Latin-American low-income mothers , 2003 .

[64]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Social Cognition, from Brains to Culture , 1984 .

[65]  Stuart M. Allen,et al.  Opportunistic social dissemination of micro-blogs , 2012, Ad Hoc Networks.

[66]  Mark Rubin,et al.  Negative Intergroup Contact Makes Group Memberships Salient: Explaining Why Intergroup Conflict Endures , 2010, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[67]  Charles R. Seger,et al.  Examining the role of positive and negative intergroup contact and anti‐immigrant prejudice in Brexit , 2017, The British journal of social psychology.

[68]  Mark Rubin,et al.  Negative intergroup contact is more influential, but positive intergroup contact is more common: Assessing contact prominence and contact prevalence in five Central European countries , 2014 .

[69]  C. Frith Social cognition , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[70]  Eli Pariser FILTER BUBBLE: Wie wir im Internet entmündigt werden , 2012 .

[71]  C. Sibley,et al.  The Contact Caveat , 2012, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[72]  K. Abbink,et al.  Parochial Altruism in Inter-Group Conflicts , 2012 .

[73]  F. Gibbons,et al.  Social comparison: The end of a theory and the emergence of a field , 2007 .

[74]  Jordi Sabater-Mir,et al.  Review on Computational Trust and Reputation Models , 2005, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[75]  Karl Sigmund,et al.  The logic of reprobation: assessment and action rules for indirect reciprocation. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[76]  D. Bar-Tal,et al.  Stereotypes and Prejudice in Conflict: Representations of Arabs in Israeli-Jewish Society , 2005 .

[77]  N. Lin Buidling a Network Theory of Social Capital , 1999, Connections.

[78]  Jerry Suls,et al.  Social comparison processes: Theoretical and empirical perspectives , 1977 .

[79]  Eli Pariser,et al.  The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You , 2011 .

[80]  Martin A. Nowak,et al.  Evolution of in-group favoritism , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[81]  E. Wilson,et al.  Genes, mind, and culture : the coevolutionary process , 1982 .

[82]  J. Dovidio,et al.  Intergroup bias: status, differentiation, and a common in-group identity. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[83]  Yoh Iwasa,et al.  How should we define goodness?--reputation dynamics in indirect reciprocity. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[84]  V. Jansen,et al.  Altruism through beard chromodynamics , 2006, Nature.

[85]  H. Tajfel Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations , 1982 .

[86]  J. Dovidio,et al.  Intergroup bias: status, differentiation, and a common in-group identity. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[87]  Nicolas Houy,et al.  Evolution of cooperation with similarity to an archetype. , 2013, Journal of theoretical biology.

[88]  R. Axelrod An Evolutionary Approach to Norms , 1986, American Political Science Review.

[89]  R. Sugden The Economics of Rights, Co-Operation, and Welfare , 1986 .

[90]  M. Milinski,et al.  Cooperation through image scoring in humans. , 2000, Science.

[91]  Michael Doebeli,et al.  A simple and general explanation for the evolution of altruism , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[92]  J M Smith,et al.  Evolution and the theory of games , 1976 .

[93]  A. Colman,et al.  Spontaneous similarity discrimination in the evolution of cooperation. , 2012, Journal of theoretical biology.

[94]  Martin A Nowak,et al.  Evolutionary dynamics in set structured populations , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[95]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  The Psychology of Intergroup Attitudes and Behavior , 1985 .

[96]  C. D. De Dreu Human Cooperation , 2013, Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society.

[97]  J. Henrich,et al.  Culture–gene coevolution, norm-psychology and the emergence of human prosociality , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[98]  M. Ruef,et al.  Strong ties, weak ties and islands: structural and cultural predictors of organizational innovation , 2002 .

[99]  Robin I. M. Dunbar Social Brain Hypothesis , 1998, Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science.