JND Analysis of Texture Roughness Perception using a Magnetic Levitation Haptic Device

This paper describes the use of a magnetic levitation haptic device (MLHD) to study the psychophysics of texture roughness. Studies of texture roughness perception performed using real textures can be time consuming and expensive. By using a MLHD to simulate texture we are able to quickly and easily adjust texture parameters. A dithered textured surface composed of conical elements is simulated using a constraint surface algorithm. The constraint surface shape is defined by the geometry of the elements as well as the size and shape of the virtual probe. The spacing of the elements and the size of the probe can be varied continuously and in real time. Just noticeable difference (JND) experiments were conducted over the parameters of probe radius and texture spacing. The JND of roughness was determined with respect to element spacing using unforced weighted up-down adaptive threshold estimation. JND's were found to vary for texture spacing and probe size. JND's for constant probe size decreased with increasing texture spacing to a minimum and then increased again. JND's for constant spacing increased as probe size increased. These results are consistent with a geometric model of probe-texture interaction

[1]  Stephen F. Davis,et al.  Handbook of Research Methods in Experimental Psychology , 2003 .

[2]  Oussama Khatib,et al.  Haptic interaction in virtual environments , 1997, Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robot and Systems. Innovative Robotics for Real-World Applications. IROS '97.

[3]  Hong Z. Tan,et al.  Discrimination of Real and Virtual High-Definition Textured Surfaces , 2006, 2006 14th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems.

[4]  Susan J. Lederman,et al.  Computational haptics: the sandpaper system for synthesizing texture for a force-feedback display , 1995 .

[5]  Dinesh K. Pai,et al.  Haptic texturing-a stochastic approach , 1996, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[6]  Russell M. Taylor,et al.  Factors contributing to the integration of textural qualities: Evidence from virtual surfaces , 2005, Somatosensory & motor research.

[7]  L. E. Krueger.  David Katz’s Der Aufbau der Tastwelt (The world of touch): A synopsis , 1970 .

[8]  S. Lederman.  Tactile roughness of grooved surfaces: The touching process and effects of macro- and microsurface structure , 1974 .

[9]  Hong Z. Tan,et al.  Force constancy and its effect on haptic perception of virtual surfaces , 2005, TAP.

[10]  Second Joint EuroHaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, WHC 2007, Tsukuba, Japan, March 22-24, 2007 , 2007, WHC.

[11]  C. Kaernbach.  Adaptive threshold estimation with unforced-choice tasks , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  Ralph L. Hollis,et al.  Tool-based haptic interaction with dynamic physical simulations using lorentz magnetic levitation , 1999 .

[13]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Feeling textures through a probe: Effects of probe and surface geometry and exploratory factors , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  Craig Zilles,et al.  Haptic rendering with the Toolhandle haptic interface , 1995 .

[15]  M. Hollins,et al.  Vibrotactile adaptation impairs discrimination of fine, but not coarse, textures. , 2001, Somatosensory & motor research.

[16]  Kenneth E. Barner,et al.  Stochastic models for haptic texture , 1996, Other Conferences.

[17]  Hong Z. Tan,et al.  Perceived Instability of Virtual Haptic Texture: III. Effect of Update Rate , 2007, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[18]  Hong Z. Tan,et al.  Effect of update rate on perceived instability of virtual haptic texture , 2004, 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37566).