Disruption of short-term memory by changing and deviant sounds: support for a duplex-mechanism account of auditory distraction.

The disruption of short-term memory by to-be-ignored auditory sequences (the changing-state effect) has often been characterized as attentional capture by deviant events (deviation effect). However, the present study demonstrates that changing-state and deviation effects are functionally distinct forms of auditory distraction: The disruption of visual-verbal serial recall by changing-state speech was independent of the effect of a single deviant voice embedded within the speech (Experiment 1); a voice-deviation effect, but not a changing-state effect, was found on a missing-item task (Experiment 2); and a deviant voice repetition within the context of an alternating-voice irrelevant speech sequence disrupted serial recall (Experiment 3). The authors conclude that the changing-state effect is the result of a conflict between 2 seriation processes being applied concurrently to relevant and irrelevant material, whereas the deviation effect reflects a more general attention-capture process.

[1]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Irrelevant tones produce an irrelevant speech effect : Implications for phonological coding in working memory , 1993 .

[2]  E. C. Cmm,et al.  on the Recognition of Speech, with , 2008 .

[3]  B B Murdock,et al.  TODAM2: a model for the storage and retrieval of item, associative, and serial-order information. , 1993, Psychological review.

[4]  Susan E. Gathercole,et al.  Models Of Short-Term Memory , 1996 .

[5]  O. Neumann.  Beyond capacity: A functional view of attention , 1987 .

[6]  Allen Allport,et al.  Visual attention , 1989 .

[7]  Albert S. Bregman,et al.  The Auditory Scene. (Book Reviews: Auditory Scene Analysis. The Perceptual Organization of Sound.) , 1990 .

[8]  A. Bregman,et al.  Primary auditory stream segregation and perception of order in rapid sequences of tones. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[9]  S. Unger,et al.  HABITUATION OF THE VASOCONSTRICTIVE ORIENTING REACTION. , 1964, Journal of experimental psychology.

[10]  V. Coltheart,et al.  Effects of Irrelevant Sounds on Phonological Coding in Reading Comprehension and Short term Memory , 1996, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[11]  R. Näätänen.  Attention and brain function , 1992 .

[12]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Disruption of visual short-term memory by changing-state auditory stimuli: The role of segmentation , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[13]  S. Tipper,et al.  Inhibitory Mechanisms of Neural and Cognitive Control: Applications to Selective Attention and Sequential Action , 1996, Brain and Cognition.

[14]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Privileged Access by Irrelevant Speech to Short-term Memory: The Role of Changing State , 1992, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[15]  Matthew Flatt,et al.  PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers , 1993 .

[16]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Preattentive voice discrimination by the human brain as indexed by the mismatch negativity , 2001, Neuroscience Letters.

[17]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Role of Serial Order in the Irrelevant Speech Effect: Tests of the Changing-State Hypothesis , 1997 .

[18]  N. Cowan.  Attention and Memory: An Integrated Framework , 1995 .

[19]  C. P. Beaman,et al.  The object-oriented episodic record model , 1996 .

[20]  M. Coles.  Orienting and Habituation: Perspectives in Human Research , 1985 .

[21]  Bill Macken,et al.  Role of Habituation in the Irrelevant Sound Effect : Evidence From the Effects of Token Set Size and Rate of Transition , 2001 .

[22]  Elke B. Lange.  Disruption of attention by irrelevant stimuli in serial recall , 2005 .

[23]  D. Whitteridge.  Lectures on Conditioned Reflexes , 1942, Nature.

[24]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Reduction in auditory distraction by retrieval strategy , 2007, Memory.

[25]  Arnold D. Well,et al.  Effects of irrelevant information on speeded classification tasks: Interference is reduced by habituation. , 1984 .

[26]  Nelson Cowan,et al.  Converging evidence about information processing , 1990, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[27]  N. Moray.  Attention in Dichotic Listening: Affective Cues and the Influence of Instructions , 1959 .

[28]  W. Ellermeier,et al.  Individual differences in susceptibility to the "irrelevant speech effect". , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  Dylan Marc Jones.  The cognitive psychology of auditory distraction: The 1997 BPS Broadbent Lecture , 1999 .

[30]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Irrelevant sound disrupts order information in free recall as in serial recall. , 1998 .

[31]  Wolfgang Babisch,et al.  Noise and health. , 2005, Environmental health perspectives.

[32]  D C LeCompte,et al.  Extending the irrelevant speech effect beyond serial recall. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[33]  Alan D. Baddeley,et al.  The effects of irrelevant speech on immediate free recall , 1990 .

[34]  N. Cowan.  Evolving conceptions of memory storage, selective attention, and their mutual constraints within the human information-processing system. , 1988, Psychological bulletin.

[35]  R. Zatorre,et al.  Constraints on the selection of auditory information. , 1998 .

[36]  A Pfefferbaum,et al.  Event-related potentials to breaks in sequences of alternating pitches or interstimulus intervals. , 1988, Psychophysiology.

[37]  M. Posner.  Foundations of cognitive science , 1989 .

[38]  H. Heuer,et al.  Perspectives on Perception and Action , 1989 .

[39]  Alan B. Welsh,et al.  Acoustic masking in primary memory. , 1976 .

[40]  E. Schröger,et al.  Auditory streaming affects the processing of successive deviant and standard sounds. , 2005, Psychophysiology.

[41]  Dianne C. Berry,et al.  Auditory memory and the irrelevant sound effect: Further evidence for changing-state disruption , 2002, Memory.

[42]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  When does between-sequence phonological similarity promote irrelevant sound disruption? , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[43]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  A negative order-repetition priming effect: inhibition of order in unattended auditory sequences? , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[44]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  The impact of order incongruence between a task-irrelevant auditory sequence and a task-relevant visual sequence. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[45]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Explaining the irrelevant-sound effect: Temporal distinctiveness or changing state? , 1999 .

[46]  Albert S. Bregman,et al.  Auditory scene analysis : hearing in complex environments , 1993 .

[47]  G. Ben-Shakhar,et al.  Novelty and significance in orientation and habituation: a feature-matching approach. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[48]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Interference in memory by process or content? A reply to Neath (2000) , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[49]  S A Hillyard,et al.  Event-related potentials (ERPs) to interruptions of a steady rhythm. , 1981, Psychophysiology.

[50]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Organizational factors in selective attention: The interplay of acoustic distinctiveness and auditory streaming in the irrelevant sound effect , 1999 .

[51]  J. Richardson,et al.  Developing the theory of working memory , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[52]  M. Velden.  Some necessary revisions of the neuronal model concept of the orienting response. , 1978, Psychophysiology.

[53]  Cristina Burani,et al.  Articulatory coding and phonological judgements on written words and pictures: The role of the phonological output buffer. , 1991 .

[54]  A S Bregman,et al.  Cumulation of the tendency to segregate auditory streams: Resetting by changes in location and loudness , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[55]  R. Näätänen.  The role of attention in auditory information processing as revealed by event-related potentials and other brain measures of cognitive function , 1990, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[56]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Auditory attentional capture during serial recall: violations at encoding of an algorithm-based neural model? , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[57]  E. Elliott,et al.  The irrelevant-speech effect and children: theoretical implications of developmental change , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[58]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Does auditory streaming require attention? Evidence from attentional selectivity in short-term memory. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[59]  J. Baron,et al.  Overcoming Stroop interference: the effects of practice on distractor potency. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[60]  E. Schröger.  On the detection of auditory deviations: a pre-attentive activation model. , 1997, Psychophysiology.

[61]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  The phonological store of working memory: is it phonological and is it a store? , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[62]  R. Knight,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Involuntary Attention to Acoustic Novelty and Change , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[63]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Organizational factors in the effect of irrelevant speech: The role of spatial location and timing , 1995, Memory & cognition.

[64]  E. Schröger,et al.  Two separate mechanisms underlie auditory change detection and involuntary control of attention , 2006, Brain Research.

[65]  E. N. Solokov.  Perception and the conditioned reflex , 1963 .

[66]  I. Winkler,et al.  Memory prerequisites of mismatch negativity in the auditory event-related potential (ERP). , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[67]  I. Winkler,et al.  ‘Primitive intelligence’ in the auditory cortex , 2001, Trends in Neurosciences.

[68]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Irrelevant Sound Disrupts Order Information in Free Recall as in Serial Recall , 1998, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[69]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Attention and mismatch negativity. , 1993, Psychophysiology.

[70]  W. Ritter,et al.  Attention affects the organization of auditory input associated with the mismatch negativity system , 1998, Brain Research.

[71]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Indispensable benefits and unavoidable costs of unattended sound for cognitive functioning. , 2003, Noise & health.

[72]  N. Burgess,et al.  Selective Interference with Verbal Short-Term Memory for Serial Order Information: A New Paradigm and Tests of a Timing-Signal Hypothesis , 2003, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[73]  Alan D. Baddeley,et al.  Disruption of short-term memory by unattended speech : Implications for the structure of working memory , 1982 .

[74]  J Driver,et al.  A selective review of selective attention research from the past century. , 2001, British journal of psychology.

[75]  W. F. Waters,et al.  Habituation of the orienting response: a gating mechanism subserving selective attention. , 1977, Psychophysiology.

[76]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  The intrusiveness of sound: Laboratory findings and their implications for noise abatement. , 2001, Noise & health.

[77]  W. Prinz,et al.  Chapter 5 Involuntary attention , 1996 .

[78]  N Cowan,et al.  Habituation to auditory distractors in a cross-modal, color-word interference task. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.