Risking Your Life without a Second Thought: Intuitive Decision-Making and Extreme Altruism

When faced with the chance to help someone in mortal danger, what is our first response? Do we leap into action, only later considering the risks to ourselves? Or must instinctive self-preservation be overcome by will-power in order to act? We investigate this question by examining the testimony of Carnegie Hero Medal Recipients (CHMRs), extreme altruists who risked their lives to save others. We collected published interviews with CHMRs where they described their decisions to help. We then had participants rate the intuitiveness versus deliberativeness of the decision-making process described in each CHMR statement. The statements were judged to be overwhelmingly dominated by intuition; to be significantly more intuitive than a set of control statements describing deliberative decision-making; and to not differ significantly from a set of intuitive control statements. This remained true when restricting to scenarios in which the CHMRs had sufficient time to reflect before acting if they had so chosen. Text-analysis software found similar results. These findings suggest that high-stakes extreme altruism may be largely motivated by automatic, intuitive processes.

[1]  A. Marsh,et al.  Geographical Differences in Subjective Well-Being Predict Extraordinary Altruism , 2014, Psychological science.

[2]  D. Fudenberg,et al.  Evolution and Cooperation in Noisy Repeated Games , 1990 .

[3]  M. Nowak,et al.  Evolutionary dynamics in structured populations , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  R. Boyd,et al.  In Search of Homo Economicus: Behavioral Experiments in 15 Small- Scale Societies , 2001 .

[5]  S. Sloman The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. , 1996 .

[6]  R. Boyd,et al.  The evolution of altruistic punishment , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  David G. Rand,et al.  Cooperating with the future , 2014, Nature.

[8]  E. Fehr,et al.  Changing Social Norm Compliance with Noninvasive Brain Stimulation , 2013, Science.

[9]  T. Yamagishi,et al.  The Social Exchange Heuristic: Managing Errors in Social Exchange , 2007 .

[10]  P J Richerson,et al.  Group selection among alternative evolutionarily stable strategies. , 1990, Journal of theoretical biology.

[11]  M. Milinski,et al.  Reputation helps solve the ‘tragedy of the commons’ , 2002, Nature.

[12]  William Hirst,et al.  Flashbulb Memories. , 2016, Current directions in psychological science.

[13]  H. Ohtsuki,et al.  A simple rule for the evolution of cooperation on graphs and social networks , 2006, Nature.

[14]  David G. Rand,et al.  Direct reciprocity with costly punishment: generous tit-for-tat prevails. , 2009, Journal of theoretical biology.

[15]  L. Cosmides,et al.  The architecture of human kin detection , 2007, Nature.

[16]  C. Hauert,et al.  Reputation-based partner choice promotes cooperation in social networks. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[17]  H. Gintis,et al.  A Cooperative Species: Human Reciprocity and Its Evolution , 2011 .

[18]  D. Kahneman A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. , 2003, The American psychologist.

[19]  C. Zahn-Waxler,et al.  Unto Others: The Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior. , 1999 .

[20]  Jason P. Mitchell,et al.  Intuitive Prosociality , 2013 .

[21]  T. Yamagishi,et al.  Social exchange and reciprocity: confusion or a heuristic? , 2000, Evolution and human behavior : official journal of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society.

[22]  David G. Rand,et al.  What Does 'Clean' Really Mean? The Implicit Framing of Decontextualized Experiments , 2013 .

[23]  Emiliana R. Simon-Thomas,et al.  Compassion: an evolutionary analysis and empirical review. , 2010, Psychological bulletin.

[24]  David G. Rand,et al.  Humans Display a 'Cooperative Phenotype' that is Domain General and Temporally Stable , 2014 .

[25]  D. Wilson A theory of group selection. , 1975, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The Evolution of Cooperation , 1984 .

[27]  D. Balliet,et al.  Trust, Punishment, and Cooperation Across 18 Societies , 2013, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[28]  D. DeSteno,et al.  Social Emotions and Intertemporal Choice , 2009 .

[29]  M. Nowak,et al.  Evolution of indirect reciprocity , 2005, Nature.

[30]  Yoh Iwasa,et al.  The leading eight: social norms that can maintain cooperation by indirect reciprocity. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[31]  Peter P. J. L. Verkoeijen,et al.  Does Intuition Cause Cooperation? , 2014, PloS one.

[32]  Martin A Nowak,et al.  Multiple strategies in structured populations , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  David G. Rand,et al.  Human cooperation , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[34]  C. Daniel Batson,et al.  Is Empathic Emotion a Source of Altruistic Motivation , 1981 .

[35]  M. Nowak,et al.  A strategy of win-stay, lose-shift that outperforms tit-for-tat in the Prisoner's Dilemma game , 1993, Nature.

[36]  Martin A. Nowak,et al.  Indirect reciprocity provides a narrow margin of efficiency for costly punishment , 2008, Nature.

[37]  M. Milinski,et al.  Cooperation through indirect reciprocity: image scoring or standing strategy? , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[38]  S. Frederick Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 19, Number 4—Fall 2005—Pages 25–42 Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making , 2022 .

[39]  A. Galinsky,et al.  Why It Pays to Get Inside the Head of Your Opponent The Differential Effects of Perspective Taking and Empathy in Strategic Interactions , 2022 .

[40]  Drew Fudenberg,et al.  The Folk Theorem in Repeated Games with Discounting or with Incomplete Information , 1986 .

[41]  Drew Fudenberg,et al.  Altruism and Self Control , 2014 .

[42]  Verena Utikal,et al.  Affect and fairness: Dictator games under cognitive load , 2014 .

[43]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Origins of human cooperation and morality. , 2013, Annual review of psychology.

[44]  M. Nowak,et al.  Tit for tat in heterogeneous populations , 1992, Nature.

[45]  M. Nowak,et al.  Evolutionary games and spatial chaos , 1992, Nature.

[46]  M. Nowak Five Rules for the Evolution of Cooperation , 2006, Science.

[47]  O. Johansson-Stenman,et al.  Are Social Preferences Skin Deep? Dictators under Cognitive Load , 2009 .

[48]  H. Ohtsuki,et al.  Strategy selection in structured populations. , 2009, Journal of theoretical biology.

[49]  J. Henrich,et al.  Culture–gene coevolution, norm-psychology and the emergence of human prosociality , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[50]  David G. Rand,et al.  Spontaneous giving and calculated greed , 2012, Nature.

[51]  Siegfried Dewitte,et al.  Bulletin Personality and Social Psychology Are Social Value Orientations Expressed Automatically? Decision Making in the Dictator Game on Behalf Of: Society for Personality and Social Psychology , 2022 .

[52]  F. Cushman,et al.  The coevolution of punishment and prosociality among learning agents , 2009 .

[53]  David G. Rand,et al.  Direct reciprocity in structured populations , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[54]  M. Nowak,et al.  Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring , 1998, Nature.

[55]  David G. Rand,et al.  Slow to Anger and Fast to Forgive: Cooperation in an Uncertain World , 2010 .

[56]  David G. Rand,et al.  Habits of Virtue: Creating Norms of Cooperation and Defection in the Laboratory , 2015 .

[57]  Dent,et al.  Cognitive Load and the Equality Heuristic: A Two-Stage Model of Resource Overconsumption in Small Groups. , 2000, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[58]  S. Bowles Did Warfare Among Ancestral Hunter-Gatherers Affect the Evolution of Human Social Behaviors? , 2009, Science.

[59]  Martin A. Nowak,et al.  Civic Capital in Two Cultures: The Nature of Cooperation in Romania and USA , 2012, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[60]  James Kulik,et al.  Flashbulb memories , 1977, Cognition.

[61]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Coevolutionary Games - A Mini Review , 2009, Biosyst..

[62]  W. Hamilton The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. , 1964, Journal of theoretical biology.

[63]  Jaromír Kovářík Giving it now or later: Altruism and discounting , 2009 .

[64]  James W. Pennebaker,et al.  Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC2007) , 2007 .

[65]  C. Daniel Batson,et al.  More evidence that empathy is a source of altruistic motivation. , 1982 .

[66]  Daniel Västfjäll,et al.  Intuition and cooperation reconsidered , 2013, Nature.

[67]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Dual-process theories in social psychology , 1999 .

[68]  A. Shariff,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article God Is Watching You Priming God Concepts Increases Prosocial Behavior in an Anonymous Economic Game , 2022 .

[69]  Keith E. Stanovich,et al.  Individual differences in rational thought. , 1998 .

[70]  E. Finkel,et al.  Low Self-Control Promotes the Willingness to Sacrifice in Close Relationships , 2013, Psychological science.

[71]  David G. Rand,et al.  Social Context and the Dynamics of Cooperative Choice , 2014 .

[72]  R. Trivers The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism , 1971, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[73]  Geoffrey M. Hodgson,et al.  Genetic and Cultural Evolution of Cooperation , 2005 .

[74]  David G. Rand,et al.  Reflection does not undermine self-interested prosociality , 2014, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[75]  Marcel Zeelenberg,et al.  Moral sentiments and cooperation: Differential influences of shame and guilt , 2007 .

[76]  N. Christakis,et al.  Social Networks and Cooperation in Hunter-Gatherers , 2011, Nature.

[77]  I. Ial,et al.  Nature Communications , 2010, Nature Cell Biology.

[78]  Hawaii,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Figs. S1 to S6 Tables S1 and S2 Database S1 Antisocial Punishment across Societies , 2022 .

[79]  David G. Rand,et al.  It's the thought that counts: The role of intentions in reciprocal altruism * , 2013 .

[80]  David G. Rand,et al.  Social heuristics shape intuitive cooperation , 2014, Nature Communications.

[81]  M. Nowak,et al.  Evolution of cooperation by multilevel selection. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[82]  S. Gächter,et al.  Culture and cooperation , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[83]  M. Crockett Models of morality , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[84]  M. Milinski,et al.  Cooperation through image scoring in humans. , 2000, Science.

[85]  E. Miller,et al.  An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[86]  G. Szabó,et al.  Evolutionary games on graphs , 2006, cond-mat/0607344.

[87]  David G. Rand,et al.  The online laboratory: conducting experiments in a real labor market , 2010, ArXiv.

[88]  Michihiro Kandori Social Norms and Community Enforcement , 1992 .

[89]  J. Henrich,et al.  Markets, Religion, Community Size, and the Evolution of Fairness and Punishment , 2010, Science.

[90]  Nalini Ambady,et al.  Accurate identification of fear facial expressions predicts prosocial behavior. , 2007, Emotion.

[91]  Michael D. Buhrmester,et al.  Contemplating the ultimate sacrifice: identity fusion channels pro-group affect, cognition, and moral decision making. , 2014, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[92]  K. Sigmund The Calculus of Selfishness , 2010 .

[93]  F. M. Cramwinckel,et al.  On the benign qualities of behavioral disinhibition: because of the prosocial nature of people, behavioral disinhibition can weaken pleasure with getting more than you deserve. , 2011, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[94]  N. McGlynn Thinking fast and slow. , 2014, Australian veterinary journal.

[95]  David G. Rand,et al.  The value of reputation , 2012, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.