Students' Understanding of the Particulate Nature of Matter

The particulate nature of matter is identified in science education standards as one of the fundamental concepts that students should understand at the middle school level. However, science education research in indicates that secondary school students have difficulties understanding the structure of matter. The purpose of the study is to describe how engaging in an extended project-based unit developed urban middle school students' understanding of the particulate nature of matter. Multiple sources of data were collected, including pre- and posttests, interviews, students' drawings, and video recordings of classroom activities. One teacher and her five classes were chosen for an indepth study. Analyses of data show that after experiencing a series of learning activities the majority of students acquired substantial content knowledge. Additionally, the finding indicates that students' understanding of the particulate nature of matter improved over time and that they retained and even reinforced their understanding after applying the concept. Discussions of the design features of curriculum and the teacher's use of multiple representations might provide insights into the effectiveness of learning activities in the unit.

[1]  Bronwen Cowie,et al.  The Characteristics of Formative Assessment in Science Education. , 2001 .

[2]  Shaaron Ainsworth,et al.  The functions of multiple representations , 1999, Comput. Educ..

[3]  R. Hoffmann,et al.  Darstellungen in der Chemie — die Sprache der Chemiker , 1991 .

[4]  Eileen A. O'Connor Students' use of atomic and molecular models in learning chemistry , 1997 .

[5]  Alan K. Griffiths,et al.  Grade-12 Students' Misconceptions Relating to Fundamental Characteristics of Atoms and Molecules. , 1992 .

[6]  Methods and Processes in Research in Science Education , 1998 .

[7]  Peter A. Bibby,et al.  Information technology and multiple representations: new opportunities – new problems , 1997 .

[8]  Jo Ellen Roseman,et al.  Can Middle-School Science textbooks help students learn important ideas? Findings from project 2061's curriculum evaluation study: Life Science , 2004 .

[9]  C. W. Anderson,et al.  Changing middle school students' conceptions of matter and molecules , 1990 .

[10]  Paul B. Hounshell,et al.  Using three-dimensional models to teach molecular structures in high school chemistry , 1995 .

[11]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  The construction and analogical transfer of symbolic visualizations. , 1993 .

[12]  D. Gabel,et al.  The Complexity of Chemistry and Implications for Teaching , 1998 .

[13]  Paul Black,et al.  Formative assessment: raising standards inside the classroom , 1998 .

[14]  Gavriel Salomon,et al.  Transcending the Qualitative-Quantitative Debate: The Analytic and Systemic Approaches to Educational Research , 1991 .

[15]  Bat-Sheva Eylon,et al.  Is an atom of copper malleable , 1986 .

[16]  Annemarie S. Palincsar,et al.  Motivating Project-Based Learning: Sustaining the Doing, Supporting the Learning , 1991 .

[17]  Daniel P. Shepardson,et al.  Questioning levels of junior high school science textbooks and their implications for learning textual information , 1991 .

[18]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Constructing Extended Inquiry Projects: Curriculum Materials for Science Education Reform , 2000 .

[19]  Lichu Lin,et al.  Language of and in the classroom: Constructing the patterns of social life , 1993 .

[20]  H. Simon,et al.  Situated Learning and Education1 , 1996 .

[21]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Promoting understanding of chemical representations: Students' use of a visualization tool in the classroom , 2001 .

[22]  Abbie Brown,et al.  Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in c , 1992 .

[23]  Roald Hoffmann,et al.  Representation in Chemistry , 1989 .

[24]  R. Kozma,et al.  The Roles of Representations and Tools in the Chemistry Laboratory and Their Implications for Chemistry Learning , 2000 .

[25]  D. Gabel,et al.  Understanding the Particulate Nature of Matter. , 1987 .

[26]  Yehudit Judy Dori,et al.  The ‘Mole Environment’ studyware: applying multidimensional analysis to quantitative chemistry problems , 1998 .

[27]  E. Soloway,et al.  A Collaborative Model for Helping Middle Grade Science Teachers Learn Project-Based Instruction , 1994, The Elementary School Journal.

[28]  Philip Johnson,et al.  Progression in children's understanding of a ‘basic’ particle theory: a longitudinal study , 1998 .

[29]  E. Soloway,et al.  Enacting Project-Based Science , 1997, The Elementary School Journal.