Visual Perception of Objects

Visual perception of objects is discussed in terms of two major topics: the perceptual organization of images into hierarchical structures of scenes (containing groups, objects, and parts) and the identification of individual objects as instances of known meaningful categories (such as chairs, houses, and dogs). The major phenomena of perceptual organization are demonstrated and discussed, including grouping, region segmentation, figure-ground perception, parsing, completion, part-whole structure, and reference frames. Several important phenomena of object identification are also demonstrated and discussed, including categorical prototypes, basic level categories, perspective effects, orientational effects, and contextual effects. Two major types of theories of object identification are outlined—part-based and view-specific theories—both of which are examined for their effectiveness in understanding how visual categorization of objects might occur. Keywords: object identification; perceptual grouping; perceptual organization; visual categorization; visual perception

[1]  J. Koenderink,et al.  The internal representation of solid shape with respect to vision , 1979, Biological Cybernetics.

[2]  S. Palmer,et al.  Late influences on perceptual grouping: Illusory figures , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  Sergei Gepshtein,et al.  Gestalt: From Phenomena to Laws , 2000 .

[4]  B. Anderson A Theory of Illusory Lightness and Transparency in Monocular and Binocular Images: The Role of Contour Junctions , 1997, Perception.

[5]  Jon Driver,et al.  Edge-Assignment and Figure–Ground Segmentation in Short-Term Visual Matching , 1996, Cognitive Psychology.

[6]  Stephen E. Palmer,et al.  Late influences on perceptual grouping: Amodal completion , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[7]  J. Hummel,et al.  Categorical relations in shape perception. , 1996, Spatial vision.

[8]  M. Kubovy,et al.  Grouping by Proximity and Multistability in Dot Lattices: A Quantitative Gestalt Theory , 1995 .

[9]  I Rock,et al.  On the nature and order of organizational processing: A reply to Peterson , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[10]  S. Palmer,et al.  Rethinking perceptual organization: The role of uniform connectedness , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[11]  S. Palmer,et al.  Grouping Based on Phenomenal Similarity of Achromatic Color , 1992, Perception.

[12]  S. Edelman,et al.  Orientation dependence in the recognition of familiar and novel views of three-dimensional objects , 1992, Vision Research.

[13]  M. Farah Is an Object an Object an Object? Cognitive and Neuropsychological Investigations of Domain Specificity in Visual Object Recognition , 1992 .

[14]  S. Palmer Common region: A new principle of perceptual grouping , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[15]  I. Biederman,et al.  Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. , 1992, Psychological review.

[16]  H. A. Witkin,et al.  Studies in space orientation. II. Perception of the upright with displaced visual fields and with body tilted. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[17]  H H Bülthoff,et al.  Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  Ronen Basri,et al.  Recognition by Linear Combinations of Models , 1991, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[19]  I. Biederman,et al.  Priming contour-deleted images: Evidence for intermediate representations in visual object recognition , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[20]  J. Tanaka,et al.  Object categories and expertise: Is the basic level in the eye of the beholder? , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[21]  P. Kellman,et al.  A theory of visual interpolation in object perception , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[22]  Mary A. Peterson,et al.  The initial identification of figure-ground relationships: Contributions from shape recognition processes , 1991 .

[23]  E. Peterhans,et al.  Subjective contours - bridging the gap between psychophysics and physiology , 1991, Trends in Neurosciences.

[24]  P Perona,et al.  Preattentive texture discrimination with early vision mechanisms. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[25]  T. Poggio,et al.  A network that learns to recognize three-dimensional objects , 1990, Nature.

[26]  S. Ullman Aligning pictorial descriptions: An approach to object recognition , 1989, Cognition.

[27]  M. Tarr,et al.  Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[28]  L. Robertson,et al.  Effects of lesions of temporal-parietal junction on perceptual and attentional processing in humans , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[29]  H. Lissauer,et al.  A case of visual agnosia with a contribution to theory , 1988 .

[30]  I. Biederman Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.

[31]  D. Delis,et al.  Hemispheric specialization of memory for visual hierarchical stimuli , 1986, Neuropsychologia.

[32]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Perceptual Organization and the Representation of Natural Form , 1986, Artif. Intell..

[33]  D W Massaro,et al.  Addressing issues in letter recognition , 1986, Psychological research.

[34]  P. Jolicoeur The time to name disoriented natural objects , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[35]  S. Palmer The role of symmetry in shape perception. , 1985, Acta psychologica.

[36]  S. Palmer,et al.  Effects of motion on perceived pointing of ambiguous triangles , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[37]  Donald D. Hoffman,et al.  Parts of recognition , 1984, Cognition.

[38]  T. Shallice,et al.  Category specific semantic impairments , 1984 .

[39]  R. von der Heydt,et al.  Illusory contours and cortical neuron responses. , 1984, Science.

[40]  Stephen M. Kosslyn,et al.  Pictures and names: Making the connection , 1984, Cognitive Psychology.

[41]  A. Marcel Conscious and unconscious perception: An approach to the relations between phenomenal experience and perceptual processes , 1983, Cognitive Psychology.

[42]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. , 1982, Psychological review.

[43]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .

[44]  B. Julesz Textons, the elements of texture perception, and their interactions , 1981, Nature.

[45]  S. Palmer What makes triangles point: Local and global effects in configurations of ambiguous triangles , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[46]  D Marr,et al.  Theory of edge detection , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[47]  J. Wolfe,et al.  The order of visual processing: “Top-down,” “bottom-up,” or “middle-out” , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.

[48]  E. Warrington,et al.  Two Categorical Stages of Object Recognition , 1978, Perception.

[49]  D. Marr,et al.  Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes , 1978, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[50]  Sheldon M. Ebenholtz,et al.  Determinants of the rod and frame effect: The role of retinal size , 1977 .

[51]  S. Palmer Hierarchical structure in perceptual representation , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[52]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Basic objects in natural categories , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[53]  E. Rosch Cognitive Representations of Semantic Categories. , 1975 .

[54]  Stephen K. Reed,et al.  Detection of parts in patterns and images , 1975, Memory & cognition.

[55]  tephen E. Palmer The effects of contextual scenes on the identification of objects , 1975, Memory & cognition.

[56]  N Weisstein,et al.  Visual Detection of Line Segments: An Object-Superiority Effect , 1974, Science.

[57]  Dave Bartram,et al.  The role of visual and semantic codes in object naming , 1974 .

[58]  P. Wenderoth The Distinction between the Rod-and-Frame Illusion and the Rod-and-Frame Test , 1974, Perception.

[59]  F Metelli,et al.  The perception of transparency. , 1974, Scientific American.

[60]  A. Taylor,et al.  The contribution of the right parietal lobe to object recognition. , 1973, Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior.

[61]  I. Biederman,et al.  Searching for objects in real-world scences. , 1973, Journal of experimental psychology.

[62]  I. Biederman Perceiving Real-World Scenes , 1972, Science.

[63]  J. Beck Similarity grouping and peripheral discriminability under uncertainty. , 1972, The American journal of psychology.

[64]  E. Leeuwenberg A perceptual coding language for visual and auditory patterns. , 1971, The American journal of psychology.

[65]  G. M. Reicher Perceptual recognition as a function of meaninfulness of stimulus material. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[66]  I. Rock,et al.  GROUPING BASED ON PHENOMENAL PROXIMITY. , 1964, Journal of experimental psychology.

[67]  R. Shepard The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function. II , 1962 .

[68]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[69]  Figural after-effect, after-image, and physiological nystagmus. , 1956, The American journal of psychology.

[70]  J. Hochberg,et al.  A quantitative approach to figural "goodness". , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.

[71]  H. A. Witkin,et al.  Studies in space orientation; perception of the upright with displaced visual fields. , 1948, Journal of experimental psychology.

[72]  Hertha Kopfermann,et al.  Psychologische Untersuchungen über die Wirkung zweidimensionaler Darstellungen körperlicher Gebilde , 1930 .

[73]  M. Wertheimer Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt. II , 1923 .