Visual Perception of Objects
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] J. Koenderink,et al. The internal representation of solid shape with respect to vision , 1979, Biological Cybernetics.
[2] S. Palmer,et al. Late influences on perceptual grouping: Illusory figures , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.
[3] Sergei Gepshtein,et al. Gestalt: From Phenomena to Laws , 2000 .
[4] B. Anderson. A Theory of Illusory Lightness and Transparency in Monocular and Binocular Images: The Role of Contour Junctions , 1997, Perception.
[5] Jon Driver,et al. Edge-Assignment and Figure–Ground Segmentation in Short-Term Visual Matching , 1996, Cognitive Psychology.
[6] Stephen E. Palmer,et al. Late influences on perceptual grouping: Amodal completion , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[7] J. Hummel,et al. Categorical relations in shape perception. , 1996, Spatial vision.
[8] M. Kubovy,et al. Grouping by Proximity and Multistability in Dot Lattices: A Quantitative Gestalt Theory , 1995 .
[9] I Rock,et al. On the nature and order of organizational processing: A reply to Peterson , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[10] S. Palmer,et al. Rethinking perceptual organization: The role of uniform connectedness , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[11] S. Palmer,et al. Grouping Based on Phenomenal Similarity of Achromatic Color , 1992, Perception.
[12] S. Edelman,et al. Orientation dependence in the recognition of familiar and novel views of three-dimensional objects , 1992, Vision Research.
[13] M. Farah. Is an Object an Object an Object? Cognitive and Neuropsychological Investigations of Domain Specificity in Visual Object Recognition , 1992 .
[14] S. Palmer. Common region: A new principle of perceptual grouping , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.
[15] I. Biederman,et al. Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. , 1992, Psychological review.
[16] H. A. Witkin,et al. Studies in space orientation. II. Perception of the upright with displaced visual fields and with body tilted. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[17] H H Bülthoff,et al. Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[18] Ronen Basri,et al. Recognition by Linear Combinations of Models , 1991, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..
[19] I. Biederman,et al. Priming contour-deleted images: Evidence for intermediate representations in visual object recognition , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.
[20] J. Tanaka,et al. Object categories and expertise: Is the basic level in the eye of the beholder? , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.
[21] P. Kellman,et al. A theory of visual interpolation in object perception , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.
[22] Mary A. Peterson,et al. The initial identification of figure-ground relationships: Contributions from shape recognition processes , 1991 .
[23] E. Peterhans,et al. Subjective contours - bridging the gap between psychophysics and physiology , 1991, Trends in Neurosciences.
[24] P Perona,et al. Preattentive texture discrimination with early vision mechanisms. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.
[25] T. Poggio,et al. A network that learns to recognize three-dimensional objects , 1990, Nature.
[26] S. Ullman. Aligning pictorial descriptions: An approach to object recognition , 1989, Cognition.
[27] M. Tarr,et al. Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.
[28] L. Robertson,et al. Effects of lesions of temporal-parietal junction on perceptual and attentional processing in humans , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.
[29] H. Lissauer,et al. A case of visual agnosia with a contribution to theory , 1988 .
[30] I. Biederman. Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.
[31] D. Delis,et al. Hemispheric specialization of memory for visual hierarchical stimuli , 1986, Neuropsychologia.
[32] Alex Pentland,et al. Perceptual Organization and the Representation of Natural Form , 1986, Artif. Intell..
[33] D W Massaro,et al. Addressing issues in letter recognition , 1986, Psychological research.
[34] P. Jolicoeur. The time to name disoriented natural objects , 1985, Memory & cognition.
[35] S. Palmer. The role of symmetry in shape perception. , 1985, Acta psychologica.
[36] S. Palmer,et al. Effects of motion on perceived pointing of ambiguous triangles , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.
[37] Donald D. Hoffman,et al. Parts of recognition , 1984, Cognition.
[38] T. Shallice,et al. Category specific semantic impairments , 1984 .
[39] R. von der Heydt,et al. Illusory contours and cortical neuron responses. , 1984, Science.
[40] Stephen M. Kosslyn,et al. Pictures and names: Making the connection , 1984, Cognitive Psychology.
[41] A. Marcel. Conscious and unconscious perception: An approach to the relations between phenomenal experience and perceptual processes , 1983, Cognitive Psychology.
[42] James L. McClelland,et al. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. , 1982, Psychological review.
[43] James L. McClelland,et al. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .
[44] B. Julesz. Textons, the elements of texture perception, and their interactions , 1981, Nature.
[45] S. Palmer. What makes triangles point: Local and global effects in configurations of ambiguous triangles , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.
[46] D Marr,et al. Theory of edge detection , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.
[47] J. Wolfe,et al. The order of visual processing: “Top-down,” “bottom-up,” or “middle-out” , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.
[48] E. Warrington,et al. Two Categorical Stages of Object Recognition , 1978, Perception.
[49] D. Marr,et al. Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes , 1978, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.
[50] Sheldon M. Ebenholtz,et al. Determinants of the rod and frame effect: The role of retinal size , 1977 .
[51] S. Palmer. Hierarchical structure in perceptual representation , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.
[52] Wayne D. Gray,et al. Basic objects in natural categories , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.
[53] E. Rosch. Cognitive Representations of Semantic Categories. , 1975 .
[54] Stephen K. Reed,et al. Detection of parts in patterns and images , 1975, Memory & cognition.
[55] tephen E. Palmer. The effects of contextual scenes on the identification of objects , 1975, Memory & cognition.
[56] N Weisstein,et al. Visual Detection of Line Segments: An Object-Superiority Effect , 1974, Science.
[57] Dave Bartram,et al. The role of visual and semantic codes in object naming , 1974 .
[58] P. Wenderoth. The Distinction between the Rod-and-Frame Illusion and the Rod-and-Frame Test , 1974, Perception.
[59] F Metelli,et al. The perception of transparency. , 1974, Scientific American.
[60] A. Taylor,et al. The contribution of the right parietal lobe to object recognition. , 1973, Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior.
[61] I. Biederman,et al. Searching for objects in real-world scences. , 1973, Journal of experimental psychology.
[62] I. Biederman. Perceiving Real-World Scenes , 1972, Science.
[63] J. Beck. Similarity grouping and peripheral discriminability under uncertainty. , 1972, The American journal of psychology.
[64] E. Leeuwenberg. A perceptual coding language for visual and auditory patterns. , 1971, The American journal of psychology.
[65] G. M. Reicher. Perceptual recognition as a function of meaninfulness of stimulus material. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.
[66] I. Rock,et al. GROUPING BASED ON PHENOMENAL PROXIMITY. , 1964, Journal of experimental psychology.
[67] R. Shepard. The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function. II , 1962 .
[68] D. Hubel,et al. Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.
[69] Figural after-effect, after-image, and physiological nystagmus. , 1956, The American journal of psychology.
[70] J. Hochberg,et al. A quantitative approach to figural "goodness". , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.
[71] H. A. Witkin,et al. Studies in space orientation; perception of the upright with displaced visual fields. , 1948, Journal of experimental psychology.
[72] Hertha Kopfermann,et al. Psychologische Untersuchungen über die Wirkung zweidimensionaler Darstellungen körperlicher Gebilde , 1930 .
[73] M. Wertheimer. Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt. II , 1923 .