Form, Function and Etiquette–Potential Users’ Perspectives on Social Domestic Robots

Social Domestic Robots (SDRs) will soon be launched en masse among commercial markets. Previously, social robots only inhabited scientific labs; now there is an opportunity to conduct experiments to investigate human-robot relationships (including user expectations of social interaction) within more naturalistic, domestic spaces, as well as to test models of technology acceptance. To this end we exposed 20 participants to advertisements prepared by three robotics companies, explaining and “pitching” their SDRs’ functionality (namely, Pepper by SoftBank; Jibo by Jibo, Inc.; and Buddy by Blue Frog Robotics). Participants were interviewed and the data was thematically analyzed to critically examine their initial reactions, concerns and impressions of the three SDRs. Using this approach, we aim to complement existing survey results pertaining to SDRs, and to try to understand the reasoning people use when evaluating SDRs based on what is publicly available to them, namely, advertising. Herein, we unpack issues raised concerning form/function, security/privacy, and the perceived emotional impact of owning an SDR. We discuss implications for the adequate design of socially engaged robotics for domestic applications, and provide four practical steps that could improve the relationships between people and SDRs. An additional contribution is made by expanding existing models of technology acceptance in domestic settings with a new factor of privacy.

[1]  Friederike Eyssel,et al.  Loneliness makes the heart grow fonder (of robots) — On the effects of loneliness on psychological anthropomorphism , 2013, 2013 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[2]  Jean Scholtz,et al.  How to trust robots further than we can throw them , 2004, CHI EA '04.

[3]  C. Bartneck,et al.  In your face, robot! The influence of a character's embodiment on how users perceive its emotional expressions , 2004 .

[4]  Adam Roberts,et al.  The History of Science Fiction , 2005 .

[5]  Pei-Luen Patrick Rau,et al.  A Cross-cultural Study: Effect of Robot Appearance and Task , 2010, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[6]  Radu Horaud,et al.  A Distributed Architecture for Interacting with NAO , 2015, ICMI.

[7]  Cheyenne L. Laue,et al.  Familiar and Strange: Gender, Sex, and Love in the Uncanny Valley , 2017, Multimodal Technol. Interact..

[8]  Charles R. Rosenberg,et al.  Interaction With Mobile Robots in Public Places , 2000 .

[9]  Author “ My Roomba is Rambo ” : Intimate Home Appliances , 2007 .

[10]  Ehud Sharlin,et al.  Robot expressionism through cartooning , 2007, 2007 2nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[11]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  Living with a Vacuum Cleaning Robot , 2013, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[12]  Vanessa Evers,et al.  Relational vs. group self-construal: Untangling the role of national culture in HRI , 2008, 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[13]  Sebastian Thrun,et al.  Robots With Humanoid Features in Public Places: A Case Study , 2000, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[14]  S. Shyam Sundar,et al.  Utilitarian vs. hedonic robots: Role of parasocial tendency and anthropomorphism in shaping user attitudes , 2011, 2011 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[15]  William D. Smart,et al.  Seeing is comforting: Effects of teleoperator visibility in robot-mediated health care , 2016, 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[16]  Jodi Forlizzi,et al.  How robotic products become social products: An ethnographic study of cleaning in the home , 2007, 2007 2nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[17]  Laurence Devillers,et al.  A social interaction system for studying humor with the Robot NAO , 2013, ICMI '13.

[18]  Jessie Y. C. Chen,et al.  Human-robot interaction: Developing trust in robots , 2012, 2012 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[19]  Batya Friedman,et al.  Hardware companions?: what online AIBO discussion forums reveal about the human-robotic relationship , 2003, CHI '03.

[20]  Maartje M. A. de Graaf,et al.  Users’ Preferences of Robots for Domestic Use , 2014, 2014 9th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[21]  Henrik I. Christensen,et al.  "Pimp My Roomba": designing for personalization , 2009, CHI.

[22]  Mathias Broth,et al.  Why That Nao?: How Humans Adapt to a Conventional Humanoid Robot in Taking Turns-at-Talk , 2016, CHI.

[23]  Christopher J. Martinez,et al.  Using the NAO humanoid robot in the classroom , 2014 .

[24]  Jodi Forlizzi,et al.  Service robots in the domestic environment: a study of the roomba vacuum in the home , 2006, HRI '06.

[25]  Omar Mubin,et al.  #naorobot: exploring Nao discourse on Twitter , 2016, OZCHI.

[26]  Yan Wu,et al.  Investigation of Practical Use of Humanoid Robots in Elderly Care Centres , 2016, HAI.

[27]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  My robotic doppelgänger - a critical look at the Uncanny Valley , 2009, RO-MAN 2009 - The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[28]  Yasuhisa Hasegawa,et al.  Facial expression of robot face for human-robot mutual communication , 2002, Proceedings 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.02CH37292).

[29]  Henrik I. Christensen,et al.  Robots in the wild: Understanding long-term use , 2009, 2009 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[30]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Emotion and sociable humanoid robots , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[31]  S. Vignesh,et al.  Real Time Implementation of Humanoid Robot Based Intelligent Child Interactive System , 2013, 2013 International Conference on Communication Systems and Network Technologies.

[32]  Timos K. Sellis,et al.  Incremental Design of a Data Warehouse , 2004, Journal of Intelligent Information Systems.

[33]  Patricia Bianca Lyk,et al.  Nao as an Authority in the Classroom: Can Nao Help the Teacher to Keep an Acceptable Noise Level? , 2015, HRI.

[34]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Cognitive and Neural Development of Face Recognition in Humans , 2009 .

[35]  Sara Ljungblad,et al.  How do you play with a robotic toy animal?: a long-term study of Pleo , 2010, IDC.

[36]  Matthew Crosby,et al.  Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence , 2014 .

[37]  Maartje M. A. de Graaf,et al.  The evaluation of different roles for domestic social robots , 2015, 2015 24th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN).

[38]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Getting to know each other - Artificial social intelligence for autonomous robots , 1995, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[39]  de M.M.A. Graaf,et al.  Long-term evaluation of a social robot in real homes , 2014, HRI 2014.

[40]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Interactive Robots as Social Partners and Peer Tutors for Children: A Field Trial , 2004, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[41]  Emiel Krahmer,et al.  Playing with iCat: investigating children's appreciation of game plays with a social robot , 2010, Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology.

[42]  Mattias Jacobsson,et al.  Play, belief and stories about robots: A case study of a pleo blogging community , 2009, RO-MAN 2009 - The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[43]  Clifford Nass,et al.  The media equation - how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places , 1996 .

[44]  Koen V. Hindriks,et al.  The icat as a natural interaction partner: playing go fish with a robot , 2011, AAMAS'11.

[45]  Heloir,et al.  The Uncanny Valley , 2019, The Animation Studies Reader.

[46]  M. Farah,et al.  The inverted face inversion effect in prosopagnosia: Evidence for mandatory, face-specific perceptual mechanisms , 1995, Vision Research.

[47]  David Levy,et al.  Love and Sex with Robots: The Evolution of Human-Robot Relationships , 2008 .

[48]  Marcel Medwed,et al.  IoT Security Challenges and Ways Forward , 2016, TrustED@CCS.

[49]  James Everett Young,et al.  Poor Thing! Would You Feel Sorry for a Simulated Robot? A comparison of empathy toward a physical and a simulated robot , 2015, 2015 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[50]  Jin H. Im,et al.  Privacy , 2002, Encyclopedia of Information Systems.

[51]  Maartje M. A. de Graaf,et al.  Long-Term Acceptance of Social Robots in Domestic Environments: Insights from a User's Perspective , 2016, AAAI Spring Symposia.