Digital Evolution in Time-Dependent Fitness Landscapes

We study the response of populations of digital organisms that adapt to a time-varying (periodic) fitness landscape of two oscillating peaks. We corroborate in general predictions from quasi-species theory in dynamic landscapes, such as adaptation to the average fitness landscape at small periods (high frequency) and quasistatic adaptation at large periods (low frequency). We also observe adaptive phase shifts (time lags between a change in the fitness landscape and an adaptive change in the population) that indicate a low-pass filter effect, in agreement with existing theory. Finally, we witness long-term adaptation to fluctuating environments not anticipated in previous theoretical work.

[1]  B. Charlesworth.  The evolution of mate choice in a fluctuating environment. , 1988, Journal of theoretical biology.

[2]  Nigel Snoad,et al.  Optimal mutation rates in dynamic environments , 2000, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[3]  Nigel Snoad,et al.  Quasispecies evolution on a fitness landscape with a fluctuating peak. , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[4]  Christoph Adami,et al.  Viral evolution under the pressure of an adaptive immune system: Optimal mutation rates for viral escape , 2002, Complex..

[5]  T. Scott,et al.  Differential evolution of eastern equine encephalitis virus populations in response to host cell type. , 2001, Genetics.

[6]  Claus O Wilke,et al.  Maternal effects in molecular evolution. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[7]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  The evolution of sex and recombination in a varying environment. , 1993, The Journal of heredity.

[8]  Thomas Martinetz,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Time-Dependent Environments , 1999, ArXiv.

[9]  F. Taddei,et al.  Role of mutator alleles in adaptive evolution , 1997, Nature.

[10]  C. Wilke,et al.  The biology of digital organisms , 2002 .

[11]  M Nilsson,et al.  Error thresholds for quasispecies on dynamic fitness landscapes. , 1999, Physical review letters.

[12]  B. Charlesworth.  Recombination modification in a fluctuating environment , 1976, Advances in Applied Probability.

[13]  R. Kaplan.  Evolutionary adjustment of spontaneous mutation rates , 2004, Humangenetik.

[14]  E. Domingo,et al.  Lack of evolutionary stasis during alternating replication of an arbovirus in insect and mammalian cells. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[15]  R. Lenski,et al.  Evolution of high mutation rates in experimental populations of E. coli , 1997, Nature.

[16]  C. Ofria,et al.  Evolution of digital organisms at high mutation rates leads to survival of the flattest , 2001, Nature.

[17]  C. Wilke.  Evolution in time-dependent fitness landscapes , 1998, physics/9811021.

[18]  Thomas Martinetz,et al.  Molecular Evolution in Time-Dependent Environments , 1999, ECAL.

[19]  Y. Iwasa,et al.  Evolutionarily stable mutation rate in a periodically changing environment. , 1989, Genetics.

[20]  Charles Ofria,et al.  Avida , 2004, Artificial Life.

[21]  M. Eigen.  Selforganization of matter and the evolution of biological macromolecules , 1971, Naturwissenschaften.

[22]  M. Eigen,et al.  The Hypercycle: A principle of natural self-organization , 2009 .

[23]  Claus O. Wilke,et al.  Dynamic fitness landscapes in molecular evolution , 1999, physics/9912012.

[24]  J. Travis,et al.  Mutator dynamics in fluctuating environments , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[25]  Christopher Ronnewinkel,et al.  Dynamic fitness landscapes: expansions for small mutation rates , 2000, physics/0010045.

[26]  J. Laakso,et al.  How does environmental variation translate into biological processes , 2001 .

[27]  S. Elena,et al.  Cost of host radiation in an RNA virus. , 2000, Genetics.

[28]  E. Leigh,et al.  Natural Selection and Mutability , 1970, The American Naturalist.

[29]  R. Lande,et al.  THE ROLE OF GENETIC VARIATION IN ADAPTATION AND POPULATION PERSISTENCE IN A CHANGING ENVIRONMENT , 1996, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[30]  Scott C. Weaver,et al.  Genetic and Fitness Changes Accompanying Adaptation of an Arbovirus to Vertebrate and Invertebrate Cells , 1999, Journal of Virology.

[31]  Stefan Bornholdt,et al.  Coevolution of quasispecies: B-cell mutation rates maximize viral error catastrophes. , 2001, Physical review letters.