The source of poor policy: controlling learning drift and premature consensus in human organizations

As system dynamicists, we spend our days finding and patching up faulty policies, giving surprisingly little thought to the origin of these poor decision rules. And yet, if we understood their origin, we might be able to attack the problem of faulty policy at its source. This article presents a theory of policy formation that is consistent with what is known about evolutionary processes and human psychology. The theory is translated into a computer simulation model, which is used to illuminate several ‘‘handles’’ on policy creation. The handles influence two potential failure modes in policy creation: (1) ‘‘learning drift’’, a process in which people learn unselectively and, hence, learn without improving; and/or (2) ‘‘premature consensus’’, a process in which managers agree on a policy before the ”best”one has emerged. Copyright  2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Syst. Dyn. Rev.17, 3‐32, (2001)

[1]  N. Repenning,et al.  Unanticipated side effects of successful quality programs: exploring a paradox of organizational improvement , 1997 .

[2]  J. Sterman,et al.  Effects of feedback complexity on dynamic decision making , 1995 .

[3]  Jim Hines,et al.  HARNESSING EVOLUTION FOR ORGANIZATIONAL MANAGEMENT , 1998 .

[4]  John H. Holland,et al.  Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence , 1992 .

[5]  Gustavo Stubrich The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization , 1993 .

[6]  Alexander Kain,et al.  Metaphor for learning: an evolutionary algorithm , 2000, GECCO.

[7]  Mark Paich,et al.  Boom, bust, and failures to learn in experimental markets , 1993 .

[8]  M. Day,et al.  The biology of plasmids. , 1987, Science progress.

[9]  Kenneth Cooper Naval Ship Production: A Claim Settled and a Framework Built , 1980 .

[10]  J. Thoday Population Genetics , 1956, Nature.

[11]  D. J. Kurpius,et al.  The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization: Book review. , 1993 .

[12]  Jim Hines,et al.  Policy Evolution within an Organization , 1999 .

[13]  C. Heyes,et al.  Social learning in animals : the roots of culture , 1996 .

[14]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[15]  M. Nei Molecular Evolutionary Genetics , 1987 .

[16]  R. Sokal Evolutionary Genetics , 1972, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[17]  Vidroha Debroy,et al.  Genetic Programming , 1998, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[18]  John H. Holland,et al.  Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence , 1992 .

[19]  D. E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search , 1989 .

[20]  Jay W. Forrester,et al.  Industrial Dynamics---After the First Decade , 1968 .

[21]  A. Meltzoff Chapter 16 - The Human Infant as Imitative Generalist: A 20-Year Progress Report on Infant Imitation with Implications for Comparative Psychology , 1996 .

[22]  D. Sterman,et al.  Misperceptions of Feedback in a Dynamic Decision Making Experiment , 1989 .

[23]  Stuart E. Madnick,et al.  Software Project Dynamics: An Integrated Approach , 1991 .

[24]  Andrew Whiten,et al.  Studies of imitation in chimpanzees and children. , 1996 .

[25]  D. Mindell Fundamentals of molecular evolution , 1991 .

[26]  A. Meltzoff Understanding the Intentions of Others: Re-Enactment of Intended Acts by 18-Month-Old Children. , 1995, Developmental psychology.

[27]  K. Mather Genetic Recombination , 1960, Nature.

[28]  J. Forrester Industrial Dynamics , 1997 .

[29]  A. Bandura Social Foundations of Thought and Action , 1986 .

[30]  John D. Sterman,et al.  Do markets mitigate misperceptions of feedback in dynamic tasks , 2003 .