Cross-talk of instructed and applied arbitrary visuomotor mappings.

Humans are able to perform any voluntary motor response to any environmental stimulus. This cornerstone of the flexibility of human behaviour has been investigated under the label of arbitrary visuomotor mapping. The focus of research has been the question as to how these mappings are executed once the subjects have been instructed appropriately. However, one question has been rather neglected thus far: what, in the first place, enables humans to instantaneously implement any arbitrary S-R mapping by mere instruction! We report an experiment assessing the cross-talk of arbitrary S-R mappings as a part of the instructed task representation, on the one hand, and the cross-talk of repetitively applied mappings, on the other hand. The results show a behavioural dissociation of the cross-talk elicited by instructed and applied mappings, suggesting that the first occurs on the level of task-set, whereas the latter occurs on the level of specific S-R associations.

[1]  N. Meiran.  Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. , 1996 .

[2]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex , 1999, Nature.

[3]  R. Gaschler,et al.  Instruction-induced feature binding , 2007, Psychological research.

[4]  P. Frensch,et al.  The influence of task instruction on action coding: constraint setting or direct coding? , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  E. Crone,et al.  Neural evidence for dissociable components of task-switching. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[6]  B. Hommel,et al.  Task-switching and long-term priming: Role of episodic stimulus–task bindings in task-shift costs , 2003, Cognitive Psychology.

[7]  R De Jong,et al.  An intention-activation account of residual switch costs , 2000 .

[8]  Stefaan Vandorpe,et al.  Further evidence for the role of mode-independent short-term associations in spatial Simon effects , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  Nachshon Meiran,et al.  The representation of instructions in working memory leads to autonomous response activation: Evidence from the first trials in the flanker paradigm , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[10]  Ivan Toni,et al.  Prefrontal-basal ganglia pathways are involved in the learning of arbitrary visuomotor associations: a PET study , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[11]  Nachshon Meiran,et al.  Reconfiguration of stimulus task sets and response task sets during task switching , 2000 .

[12]  Nachshon Meiran,et al.  Advance task preparation reduces task error rate in the cuing task-switching paradigm , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[13]  G. Logan.  Toward an instance theory of automatization. , 1988 .

[14]  S. Wise,et al.  Arbitrary associations between antecedents and actions , 2000, Trends in Neurosciences.

[15]  A. Allport,et al.  Cue-based preparation and stimulus-based priming of tasks in task switching , 2006, Memory & cognition.

[16]  D. Alan Allport,et al.  SHIFTING INTENTIONAL SET - EXPLORING THE DYNAMIC CONTROL OF TASKS , 1994 .

[17]  J. Driver,et al.  Control of Cognitive Processes: Attention and Performance XVIII , 2000 .

[18]  Marcel Brass,et al.  When the same response has different meanings: recoding the response meaning in the lateral prefrontal cortex , 2003, NeuroImage.