Top–Down Modulation from Inferior Frontal Junction to FEFs and Intraparietal Sulcus during Short-term Memory for Visual Features

Visual STM of simple features is achieved through interactions between retinotopic visual cortex and a set of frontal and parietal regions. In the present fMRI study, we investigated effective connectivity between central nodes in this network during the different task epochs of a modified delayed orientation discrimination task. Our univariate analyses demonstrate that the inferior frontal junction (IFJ) is preferentially involved in memory encoding, whereas activity in the putative FEFs and anterior intraparietal sulcus (aIPS) remains elevated throughout periods of memory maintenance. We have earlier reported, using the same task, that areas in visual cortex sustain information about task-relevant stimulus properties during delay intervals [Sneve, M. H., Alnæs, D., Endestad, T., Greenlee, M. W., & Magnussen, S. Visual short-term memory: Activity supporting encoding and maintenance in retinotopic visual cortex. Neuroimage, 63, 166–178, 2012]. To elucidate the temporal dynamics of the IFJ-FEF-aIPS-visual cortex network during memory operations, we estimated Granger causality effects between these regions with fMRI data representing memory encoding/maintenance as well as during memory retrieval. We also investigated a set of control conditions involving active processing of stimuli not associated with a memory task and passive viewing. In line with the developing understanding of IFJ as a region critical for control processes with a possible initiating role in visual STM operations, we observed influence from IFJ to FEF and aIPS during memory encoding. Furthermore, FEF predicted activity in a set of higher-order visual areas during memory retrieval, a finding consistent with its suggested role in top–down biasing of sensory cortex.

[1]  Jérémie Mattout,et al.  Altered retrieval of melodic information in congenital amusia: insights from dynamic causal modeling of MEG data , 2015, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[2]  Remco J. Renken,et al.  The effect of intra- and inter-subject variability of hemodynamic responses on group level Granger causality analyses , 2011, NeuroImage.

[3]  Martin M. Monti,et al.  Human Neuroscience , 2022 .

[4]  C. Bruce,et al.  Primate frontal eye fields. I. Single neurons discharging before saccades. , 1985, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  Lotfi B Merabet,et al.  Visual Topography of Human Intraparietal Sulcus , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  The identification of interacting networks in the brain using fMRI: Model selection, causality and deconvolution , 2011, NeuroImage.

[7]  C. Curtis Prefrontal and parietal contributions to spatial working memory , 2006, Neuroscience.

[8]  A. Nobre,et al.  Modulation of working-memory maintenance by directed attention , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  A. Nobre,et al.  Top-down modulation: bridging selective attention and working memory , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[10]  M. Brass,et al.  The role of the inferior frontal junction area in cognitive control , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[11]  Clayton E. Curtis,et al.  Persistent neural activity during the maintenance of spatial position in working memory , 2008, NeuroImage.

[12]  Junying Yuan,et al.  Selective gating of visual signals by microstimulation of frontal cortex , 2022 .

[13]  Michael Petrides,et al.  Local Morphology Predicts Functional Organization of the Dorsal Premotor Region in the Human Brain , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  T. Paus,et al.  Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Human Frontal Eye Field: Effects on Visual Perception and Attention , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  Denis Schluppeck,et al.  Differential roles for frontal eye fields (FEFs) and intraparietal sulcus (IPS) in visual working memory and visual attention. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[16]  Karl J. Friston Causal Modelling and Brain Connectivity in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2009, PLoS biology.

[17]  F. Tong,et al.  Decoding reveals the contents of visual working memory in early visual areas , 2009, Nature.

[18]  Tomás Paus,et al.  Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Human Frontal Eye ®eld Facilitates Visual Awareness , 2022 .

[19]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Network modelling methods for FMRI , 2011, NeuroImage.

[20]  S. Petersen,et al.  Characterizing the Hemodynamic Response: Effects of Presentation Rate, Sampling Procedure, and the Possibility of Ordering Brain Activity Based on Relative Timing , 2000, NeuroImage.

[21]  Adam Gazzaley,et al.  Top-down modulation of visual feature processing: The role of the inferior frontal junction , 2010, NeuroImage.

[22]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Neural Representations of Relevant and Irrelevant Features in Perceptual Decision Making , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  P. Roelfsema,et al.  Bottom-Up Dependent Gating of Frontal Signals in Early Visual Cortex , 2008, Science.

[24]  T Moore,et al.  Control of eye movements and spatial attention. , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Adam Gazzaley,et al.  Expectation-Driven Changes in Cortical Functional Connectivity Influence Working Memory and Long-Term Memory Performance , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  Yei-Yu Yeh,et al.  Functional connectivity during top-down modulation of visual short-term memory representations , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[27]  Anna C Nobre,et al.  FEF TMS affects visual cortical activity. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[28]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Separating Processes within a Trial in Event-Related Functional MRI II. Analysis , 2001, NeuroImage.

[29]  J. Serences,et al.  Neural system for controlling the contents of object working memory in humans. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[30]  R. Deichmann,et al.  Distinct causal influences of parietal versus frontal areas on human visual cortex: evidence from concurrent TMS-fMRI. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[31]  Marisa Carrasco,et al.  Feature-based attention modulates orientation-selective responses in human visual cortex , 2010 .

[32]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Neural Correlates of Visual Working Memory fMRI Amplitude Predicts Task Performance , 2002, Neuron.

[33]  Anil K. Seth,et al.  Granger causality analysis of fMRI BOLD signals is invariant to hemodynamic convolution but not downsampling , 2013, NeuroImage.

[34]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Feature-based attention in visual cortex , 2006, Trends in Neurosciences.

[35]  L. Yao,et al.  Causal Interactions in Attention Networks Predict Behavioral Performance , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  Mark D'Esposito,et al.  From cognitive to neural models of working memory , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[37]  D. Y. von Cramon,et al.  Functional organization of the left inferior precentral sulcus: Dissociating the inferior frontal eye field and the inferior frontal junction , 2012, NeuroImage.

[38]  Suk Won Han,et al.  The neural correlates of visual working memory encoding: A time-resolved fMRI study , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[39]  C. Segebarth,et al.  Identifying Neural Drivers with Functional MRI: An Electrophysiological Validation , 2008, PLoS biology.

[40]  Adam C. Riggall,et al.  The Relationship between Working Memory Storage and Elevated Activity as Measured with Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[41]  Xiaoping Hu,et al.  Investigating Effective Brain Connectivity from fMRI Data: Past Findings and Current Issues with Reference to Granger Causality Analysis , 2012, Brain Connect..

[42]  Justin L. Gardner,et al.  Feature-Specific Attentional Priority Signals in Human Cortex , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[43]  G. Boynton,et al.  Feature-Based Attentional Modulations in the Absence of Direct Visual Stimulation , 2007, Neuron.

[44]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Memory: Enduring Traces of Perceptual and Reflective Attention , 2011, Neuron.

[45]  R. Desimone,et al.  A backward progression of attentional effects in the ventral stream , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[46]  Steven L. Bressler,et al.  Wiener–Granger Causality: A well established methodology , 2011, NeuroImage.

[47]  D. Linden,et al.  The Working Memory Networks of the Human Brain , 2007, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[48]  Anil K. Seth,et al.  A MATLAB toolbox for Granger causal connectivity analysis , 2010, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[49]  Edward F. Ester,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Stimulus-Specific Delay Activity in Human Primary Visual Cortex , 2022 .

[50]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Mapping directed influence over the brain using Granger causality and fMRI , 2005, NeuroImage.

[51]  Martin Lages,et al.  Spatial frequency discrimination: Visual long-term memory or criterion setting? , 1998, Vision Research.

[52]  Jens Timmer,et al.  Handbook of Time Series Analysis , 2006 .

[53]  B. Wandell,et al.  Visual Field Maps in Human Cortex , 2007, Neuron.

[54]  A. Nobre,et al.  Attentional modulation of object representations in working memory. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[55]  M. Chun,et al.  Dissociable neural mechanisms supporting visual short-term memory for objects , 2006, Nature.

[56]  Theodore P. Zanto,et al.  Causal role of the prefrontal cortex in top-down modulation of visual processing and working memory , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[57]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Top-Down Control of Human Visual Cortex by Frontal and Parietal Cortex in Anticipatory Visual Spatial Attention , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[58]  R. Deichmann,et al.  Concurrent TMS-fMRI and Psychophysics Reveal Frontal Influences on Human Retinotopic Visual Cortex , 2006, Current Biology.

[59]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Separating Processes within a Trial in Event-Related Functional MRI I. The Method , 2001, NeuroImage.

[60]  Tirin Moore,et al.  Selection and Maintenance of Spatial Information by Frontal Eye Field Neurons , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[61]  Dag Alnæs,et al.  Visual short-term memory: Activity supporting encoding and maintenance in retinotopic visual cortex , 2012, NeuroImage.

[62]  Janneke F. M. Jehee,et al.  Attention Improves Encoding of Task-Relevant Features in the Human Visual Cortex , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[63]  A. Watson,et al.  Quest: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[64]  Clayton E Curtis,et al.  Selection and maintenance of saccade goals in the human frontal eye fields. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[65]  Marisa Carrasco,et al.  Feature-Based Attention Modulates Orientation-Selective Responses in Human Visual Cortex , 2007, Neuron.

[66]  Mark G. Stokes,et al.  Attention Biases Visual Activity in Visual Short-term Memory , 2014, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[68]  Catie Chang,et al.  Mapping and correction of vascular hemodynamic latency in the BOLD signal , 2008, NeuroImage.

[69]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  A comparison of Granger causality and coherency in fMRI‐based analysis of the motor system , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[70]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[71]  Sabine Kastner,et al.  Topographic maps in human frontal cortex revealed in memory-guided saccade and spatial working-memory tasks. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[72]  S. Bressler,et al.  Granger Causality: Basic Theory and Application to Neuroscience , 2006, q-bio/0608035.

[73]  Katherine M. Armstrong,et al.  Selective gating of visual signals by microstimulation of frontal cortex , 2003, Nature.