Context matters: increasing understanding with interactive Clicker Case studies

Although interactive technology is presumed to increase student understanding in large classes, no previous research studies have empirically explored the effects of Clicker Cases on students’ performance. A Clicker Case is a story (e.g., a problem someone is facing) that uses clickers (student response systems) to engage students in understanding the meaning of the science contained within the story. Using an experimental randomized Solomon design across 11 institutions, we found that Clicker Cases increased student understanding more than PowerPoint lectures in large introductory biology classrooms, although there was variation across institutions and topics. By examining student performance in conjunction with faculty experience, we found that strong Clicker Cases created dissonance, captured attention and involved students in interpreting data or making decisions. This study provides a model for collaborative research across multiple institutions and demonstrates the need for using multiple institutions and topics in research on education.

[1]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Toward a design theory of problem solving , 2000 .

[2]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Instructional design models for well-structured and III-structured problem-solving learning outcomes , 1997 .

[3]  Stephan Schwan,et al.  Learning with Hyperlinked Videos--Design Criteria and Efficient Strategies for Using Audiovisual Hypermedia. , 2004 .

[4]  Scott R. Homan,et al.  Student evaluation of audience response technology in large lecture classes , 2008 .

[5]  Michael J. Padilla.  Developing a World View for Science Education: A Message from the NSTA President. , 2005 .

[6]  Kevin C. Almeroth,et al.  Clickers in college classrooms: Fostering learning with questioning methods in large lecture classes , 2009 .

[7]  M. Elwood,et al.  Sun exposure modification programmes and their evaluation: a review of the literature , 1996 .

[8]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Case-based reasoning and instructional design: Using stories to support problem solving , 2002 .

[9]  E. Mazur,et al.  Peer Instruction: Ten years of experience and results , 2001 .

[10]  Jeremy Roschelle,et al.  Classroom Response and Communication Systems: Research Review and Theory , 2004 .

[11]  Robert J. Dufresne,et al.  Classtalk: A classroom communication system for active learning , 1996, J. Comput. High. Educ..

[12]  Erica Suchman,et al.  Evaluating the impact of a classroom response system in a microbiology course. , 2006, Microbiology education.

[13]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  A time for telling , 1998 .

[14]  J. J. Carroll.  The Power of Problem-Based Learning. , 2005 .

[15]  J. Shea.  National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[16]  George D. Kuh,et al.  Student Engagement and Student Learning: Testing the Linkages* , 2006 .

[17]  Aman Yadav,et al.  Teaching Science with Case Studies: A National Survey of Faculty Perceptions of the Benefits and Challenges of Using Cases , 2007 .

[18]  Kirsten Crossgrove,et al.  Using clickers in nonmajors- and majors-level biology courses: student opinion, learning, and long-term retention of course material. , 2008, CBE life sciences education.

[19]  Michele H. Jackson,et al.  The learning environment in clicker classrooms: student processes of learning and involvement in large university‐level courses using student response systems , 2007 .

[20]  Michelle K. Smith,et al.  Why Peer Discussion Improves Student Performance on In-Class Concept Questions , 2009, Science.

[21]  Anna Carlin,et al.  Waking the Dead: Using interactive technology to engage passive listeners in the classroom , 2004, AMCIS.

[22]  Michael Pressley,et al.  Educational Psychology: Learning, Instruction, Assessment , 1996 .

[23]  Serge Herzog,et al.  The Ecology of Learning: The Impact of Classroom Features and Utilization on Student Academic Success. , 2007 .

[24]  Douglas Duncan,et al.  Clickers in the Classroom: How to Enhance Science Teaching Using Classroom Response Systems , 2004 .

[25]  Joseph T Thompson,et al.  A case‐based approach increases student learning outcomes and comprehension of cellular respiration concepts , 2007, Biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.

[26]  C. F. Herreid.  Case Studies in Science--A Novel Method of Science Education. , 1994 .

[27]  Clyde Freeman Herreid,et al.  "Clicker" Cases: Introducing Case Study Teaching into Large Classrooms , 2006 .

[28]  Khe Foon Hew,et al.  The impact of the use of response pad system on the learning of secondary school physics concepts: A Singapore quasi-experiment study , 2009, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[29]  Charles Xiaoxue Wang,et al.  Student Response Systems in Higher Education: Moving Beyond Linear Teaching and Surface Learning , 2008 .

[30]  Barbara B. Levin,et al.  Who learns what from cases and how? : the research base for teaching and learning with cases , 1999 .

[31]  C. Hmelo‐Silver.  Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn? , 2004 .

[32]  Ernest T. Pascarella,et al.  How College Affects Students: A Third Decade of Research. Volume 2. , 2005 .

[33]  James S. Fairweather,et al.  The Evolution of American Scientific Fields: Disciplinary Differences Versus Institutional Isomorphism , 2008 .

[34]  Aman Yadav,et al.  Assessment of Case Study Teaching: Where Do We Go from Here? Part II. , 2006 .