Steps toward a sound measure of engineering student attitudes: Pittsburgh Engineering Attitudes Scale - Revised

Engineering education is currently undergoing a transition toward increased constructivist practices and a new philosophy of education that recognizes the active role of the learner in constructing knowledge. To meet the demands of the changing landscape, our research team has been reworking the Pittsburgh Engineering Attitudes Scale so that valid and reliable inferences can be made about engineering student attitudes. The current study follows up on our analysis of the scale at FIE 2008, and presents evidence of structural validity, internal reliability, and external validity of student responses to a revised version of the scale. The results of the current study suggest the Pittsburgh Engineering Attitudes Scale - Revised overcomes previous problems with the original scale reported in the literature and that we are making positive steps toward a sound measure of student attitudes.

[1]  L. Vygotsky.  Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes: Harvard University Press , 1978 .

[2]  Wonsik Kim,et al.  An exploratory factor analysis of the Pittsburgh Freshman Engineering Attitudes Survey , 2008, 2008 38th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference.

[3]  Robert F. DeVellis,et al.  Scale Development: Theory and Applications. , 1992 .

[4]  James J. Duderstadt,et al.  Engineering for a Changing World - A Roadmap to the Future of Engineering Practice, Research, and Education (Flexner) , 2008 .

[5]  Jeremy D. Finn,et al.  Measurement and Evaluation. , 1973 .

[6]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Reliability and Predictive Validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (Mslq) , 1993 .

[7]  J. Heywood,et al.  Philosophy and engineering education. A review of certain developments in the field , 2008, 2008 38th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference.

[8]  John Heywood,et al.  Special session - continuing the FIE 2007 conversation on: Can philosophy of engineering education improve the practice of engineering education? , 2008, 2008 38th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference.

[9]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. , 1999 .

[10]  Ann F. McKenna,et al.  Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field , 2010 .

[11]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Learners as information processors: Legacies and limitations of educational psychology's second.. , 1996 .

[12]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using multivariate statistics, 5th ed. , 2007 .

[13]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[14]  C. Atman,et al.  Gender and Ethnicity Differences in Freshmen Engineering Student Attitudes: A Cross‐Institutional Study * , 2001 .

[15]  Jenefer Husman,et al.  The Intersection of Students' Perceptions of Instrumentality, Self-Efficacy, and Goal Orientations in an Online Mathematics Course , 2007 .

[16]  J. Piaget,et al.  The Origins of Intelligence in Children , 1971 .

[17]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[18]  T.S. Harding,et al.  The psychology of ‘ought’ , 2008, 2008 38th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference.

[19]  J. Wilder.  The Origins of Intelligence in Children , 1954 .

[20]  R. M. Thorndike.  Measurement and Evaluation in Psychology and Education , 1969 .

[21]  M. D’Esposito.  Working memory. , 2008, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[22]  B P O'Connor,et al.  SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test , 2000, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[23]  J. Duderstadt.  Engineering for a Changing World , 2010 .

[24]  A. Bandura.  Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[25]  E. Seymour,et al.  Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave The Sciences , 1997 .

[26]  Edward E. Anderson,et al.  A Paradigm for Assessing Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge in Engineering Students , 2007 .

[27]  Linda Serra Hagedorn,et al.  A Social Cognitive Construct Validation: Determining Women's and Men's Success in Engineering Programs , 2007 .

[28]  Gregory Schraw.  Knowledge: Structures and Processes. , 2006 .

[29]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  Learning Theories and Education: Toward a Decade of Synergy , 2006 .

[30]  Duane F. Shell,et al.  The Impact of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Communities on High School Students' Knowledge Building, Strategic Learning, and Perceptions of the Classroom , 2005 .

[31]  Richard C. Atkinson,et al.  Human Memory: A Proposed System and its Control Processes , 1968, Psychology of Learning and Motivation.

[32]  J. Ormrod.  Educational Psychology : Developing Learners , 1997 .

[33]  Cynthia J. Atman,et al.  Comparing entering freshman engineers , 1999 .

[34]  Elaine Seymour,et al.  The loss of women from science, mathematics, and engineering undergraduate majors: An explanatory account , 1995 .

[35]  C. Atman,et al.  Comparing Entering Freshman Engineers: Institutional Differences In Student Attitudes , 1999 .

[36]  Catherine T. Amelink,et al.  Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Research Methods in Engineering Education , 2009 .

[37]  R. Cattell.  The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors. , 1966, Multivariate behavioral research.

[38]  B. Zimmerman,et al.  Self-regulated learning and academic achievement : theoretical perspectives , 2001 .