Hydrogen Recovery from Waste Gas Streams to Feed (High-Temperature PEM) Fuel Cells: Environmental Performance under a Life-Cycle Thinking Approach

Fossil fuels are being progressively substituted by a cleaner and more environmentally friendly form of energy, where hydrogen fuel cells stand out. However, the implementation of a competitive hydrogen economy still presents several challenges related to economic costs, required infrastructures, and environmental performance. In this context, the objective of this work is to determine the environmental performance of the recovery of hydrogen from industrial waste gas streams to feed high-temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cells for stationary applications. The life-cycle assessment (LCA) analyzed alternative scenarios with different process configurations, considering as functional unit 1 kg of hydrogen produced, 1 kWh of energy obtained, and 1 kg of inlet flow. The results make the recovery of hydrogen from waste streams environmentally preferable over alternative processes like methane reforming or coal gasification. The production of the fuel cell device resulted in high contributions in the abiotic depletion potential and acidification potential, mainly due to the presence of platinum metal in the anode and cathode. The design and operation conditions that defined a more favorable scenario are the availability of a pressurized waste gas stream, the use of photovoltaic electricity, and the implementation of an energy recovery system for the residual methane stream.

[1]  Joe Zietsman,et al.  Urban policy interventions to reduce traffic emissions and traffic-related air pollution: Protocol for a systematic evidence map. , 2020, Environment international.

[2]  Frederico M. Relvas,et al.  PSA purification of waste hydrogen from ammonia plants to fuel cell grade , 2020, Separation and Purification Technology.

[3]  Jun Gao,et al.  Life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis of biomass-to-hydrogen production with methane tri-reforming , 2020, Energy.

[4]  K. Gilroy,et al.  5610611 REAL-WORLD EVIDENCE CHARACTERIZING THE BURDEN OF DISEASE IN ALPHA AND BETA THALASSEMIA PATIENTS IN THE USA: AN INTERIM ANALYSIS , 2023, HemaSphere.

[5]  I. Ortiz,et al.  Comparative performance of commercial polymeric membranes in the recovery of industrial hydrogen waste gas streams , 2020 .

[6]  Y. Rybarczyk,et al.  A Traffic-Based Method to Predict and Map Urban Air Quality , 2020, Applied Sciences.

[7]  M. Margallo,et al.  Environmental performance of alternatives to treat fly ash from a waste to energy plant , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[8]  Andrej Lotrič,et al.  Critical materials in PEMFC systems and a LCA analysis for the potential reduction of environmental impacts with EoL strategies , 2019, Energy Science & Engineering.

[9]  A. Moghadassi,et al.  Hydrogen recovery from ammonia purge gas by a membrane separator: A simulation study , 2019, International Journal of Energy Research.

[10]  He,et al.  Experimental Study and Thermodynamic Analysis of Hydrogen Production through a Two-Step Chemical Regenerative Coal Gasification , 2019, Applied Sciences.

[11]  M. Sulaiman,et al.  Experimental and theoretical study of thermoelectric generator waste heat recovery model for an ultra-low temperature PEM fuel cell powered vehicle , 2019, Energy.

[12]  Feng Zhang,et al.  System development and environmental performance analysis of a solar-driven supercritical water gasification pilot plant for hydrogen production using life cycle assessment approach , 2019, Energy Conversion and Management.

[13]  Lei Yu,et al.  Robust Planning of Energy and Environment Systems through Introducing Traffic Sector with Cost Minimization and Emissions Abatement under Multiple Uncertainties , 2019, Applied Sciences.

[14]  I. Dincer,et al.  A well to pump life cycle environmental impact assessment of some hydrogen production routes , 2019, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy.

[15]  P. Ekins,et al.  The role of hydrogen and fuel cells in the global energy system , 2019, Energy & Environmental Science.

[16]  Ademola Rabiu,et al.  Performance evaluation of a HT-PEM fuel cell micro-cogeneration system for domestic application , 2019 .

[17]  Józef Flizikowski,et al.  Life Cycle Analysis of Ecological Impacts of an Offshore and a Land-Based Wind Power Plant , 2019, Applied Sciences.

[18]  Á. Irabien,et al.  The carbon footprint of Power-to-Synthetic Natural Gas by Photovoltaic solar powered Electrochemical Reduction of CO2 , 2019, Sustainable Production and Consumption.

[19]  S. Badwal,et al.  A comprehensive review of carbon and hydrocarbon assisted water electrolysis for hydrogen production , 2018, Applied Energy.

[20]  D. Xiang,et al.  Concept design and techno-economic performance of hydrogen and ammonia co-generation by coke-oven gas-pressure swing adsorption integrated with chemical looping hydrogen process , 2018, Applied Energy.

[21]  O. Aksyutin.  THE CARBON FOOTPRINT OF NATURAL GAS AND ITS ROLE IN THE CARBON FOOTPRINT OF ENERGY PRODUCTION , 2018, International Journal of GEOMATE.

[22]  Wensheng Lin,et al.  Hydrogen and LNG production from coke oven gas with multi-stage helium expansion refrigeration , 2018, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy.

[23]  Fabio Rinaldi,et al.  Optimization of an HT-PEM fuel cell based residential micro combined heat and power system: A multi-objective approach , 2018 .

[24]  Luling Li,et al.  Life cycle greenhouse gas assessment of hydrogen production via chemical looping combustion thermally coupled steam reforming , 2018 .

[25]  Zhang Tao,et al.  Economic analysis of hydrogen production from steam reforming process: A literature review , 2018 .

[26]  Alan J. Murphy,et al.  Assessment of full life-cycle air emissions of alternative shipping fuels , 2018 .

[27]  C. Rösch,et al.  Critical Review of Microalgae LCA Studies for Bioenergy Production , 2018, BioEnergy Research.

[28]  Yaser Khojasteh Salkuyeh,et al.  Techno-economic analysis and life cycle assessment of hydrogen production from natural gas using current and emerging technologies , 2017 .

[29]  Pierre Fréon,et al.  Life cycle assessment of three Peruvian fishmeal plants: Toward a cleaner production , 2017 .

[30]  C. Topp,et al.  Relative emissions intensity of dairy production systems: employing different functional units in life-cycle assessment , 2017, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[31]  Guillaume Mandil,et al.  Environmental assessment of proton exchange membrane fuel cell platinum catalyst recycling , 2017 .

[32]  Carla Tagliaferri,et al.  Life cycle assessment of a polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell system for passenger vehicles , 2017 .

[33]  Diego Iribarren,et al.  Life cycle assessment of hydrogen energy systems: a review of methodological choices , 2017, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[34]  Aranya Venkatesh,et al.  Estimating the Greenhouse Gas Balance of Individual Gas‐Fired and Oil‐Fired Electricity Plants on a Global Scale , 2017 .

[35]  André Bardow,et al.  Life cycle assessment of hydrogen production by thermal cracking of methane based on liquid-metal technology , 2016 .

[36]  L. Mancini,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of an innovative recycling process for crystalline silicon photovoltaic panels , 2016 .

[37]  Ammar Houas,et al.  Energetic, exergetic and environmental life cycle assessment analyses as tools for optimization of hydrogen production by autothermal reforming of bioethanol , 2016 .

[38]  F. Snijkers,et al.  Recent developments in oxygen carrier materials for hydrogen production via chemical looping processes , 2016 .

[39]  Zongliang Zuo,et al.  Thermodynamic analysis of hydrogen production from raw coke oven gas via steam reforming , 2016, Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry.

[40]  Amit Kumar,et al.  Life cycle assessment of wind-based hydrogen production in Western Canada , 2016 .

[41]  Christian Bauer,et al.  A life-cycle perspective on automotive fuel cells , 2015 .

[42]  P. Ahmadi,et al.  Comparative life cycle assessment of hydrogen fuel cell passenger vehicles in different Canadian provinces , 2015 .

[43]  Qingling Liu,et al.  Optimization of steam methane reforming coupled with pressure swing adsorption hydrogen production process by heat integration , 2015 .

[44]  F. J. Gutiérrez Ortiz,et al.  Life cycle assessment of hydrogen and power production by supercritical water reforming of glycerol. , 2015 .

[45]  Giorgio Baldinelli,et al.  Life cycle assessment of electricity production from renewable energies: Review and results harmonization , 2015 .

[46]  Ramchandra Bhandari,et al.  Life cycle assessment of hydrogen production via electrolysis – a review , 2014 .

[47]  Inmaculada Ortiz,et al.  Progress in the use of ionic liquids as electrolyte membranes in fuel cells , 2014 .

[48]  Maohong Fan,et al.  The progress in water gas shift and steam reforming hydrogen production technologies – A review , 2014 .

[49]  Almudena Hospido,et al.  Life cycle assessment of European pilchard (Sardina pilchardus) consumption. A case study for Galicia (NW Spain). , 2014, The Science of the total environment.

[50]  Paolo Maggiore,et al.  Analysis of environmental benefits resulting from use of hydrogen technology in handling operations at airports , 2013, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[51]  Suojiang Zhang,et al.  Coke oven gas: Availability, properties, purification, and utilization in China , 2013 .

[52]  D. Iribarren,et al.  Life-cycle performance of indirect biomass gasification as a green alternative to steam methane reforming for hydrogen production , 2013 .

[53]  Rashmi Chaubey,et al.  A review on development of industrial processes and emerging techniques for production of hydrogen from renewable and sustainable sources , 2013 .

[54]  M. Pons,et al.  Comparative life cycle assessment of eight alternatives for hydrogen production from renewable and fossil feedstock , 2013 .

[55]  Troy R. Hawkins,et al.  Comparative Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Conventional and Electric Vehicles , 2013 .

[56]  G. Naterer,et al.  Life cycle assessment of various hydrogen production methods , 2012 .

[57]  William R. Smith,et al.  Clean hydrogen production with the Cu–Cl cycle – Progress of international consortium, II: Simulations, thermochemical data and materials , 2011 .

[58]  Ibrahim Dincer,et al.  Sustainability aspects of hydrogen and fuel cell systems , 2011 .

[59]  Maria Teresa Moreira,et al.  Implementing by-product management into the Life Cycle Assessment of the mussel sector , 2010 .

[60]  Mohammad Reza Rahimpour,et al.  Production of hydrogen from purge gases of ammonia plants in a catalytic hydrogen-permselective membrane reactor , 2009 .

[61]  G. Gaillard,et al.  LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION SYSTEMS : CURRENT ISSUES AND FUTURE PERSPECTIVES , 2007 .

[62]  U. Wagner,et al.  Energetic life cycle assessment of fuel cell powertrain systems and alternative fuels in Germany , 2006 .

[63]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  The Revision of ISO Standards 14040-3 - ISO 14040: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework - ISO 14044: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines , 2005 .

[64]  Bent SØRENSEN,et al.  Total life-cycle assessment of PEM fuel cell car , 2004 .

[65]  K. Chue,et al.  A TWO STAGE PSA FOR ARGON AND HYDROGEN RECOVERY FROM AMMONIA PURGE GAS , 1998 .